Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 00:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3589
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 548

Kudos [?]: 3559 [0], given: 360

Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2007, 22:41
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

89% (01:32) correct 11% (01:12) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

463. Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut

Please, explain. Why is be made known correct in B?
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 0

Re: 463 of SC1000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2007, 04:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
walker wrote:
463. Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut

Please, explain. Why is be made known correct in B?

This is a type of sentence where one person or body expects/desires/orders/requests/etc. to do something and the correct form of the sentence is then THAT+Infinitive form of the verb without TO.
E.g. In the option B, it's actually *TO BE made known* but it is expected that you know it.

C/D is not correct since *should* indicates only moral obligation and court of law cannot impose a moral obligation.

E ...they is not clear. also *THAT* is missing

A i just can't explain why A is wrong but i know that it is wrong.

If you have Manhattan SC guide, please refer to Page 49.
Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Re: 463 of SC1000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2007, 08:51
Mia.Andersson wrote:
walker wrote:
463. Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut
(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting
(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut

Please, explain. Why is be made known correct in B?

This is a type of sentence where one person or body expects/desires/orders/requests/etc. to do something and the correct form of the sentence is then THAT+Infinitive form of the verb without TO.
E.g. In the option B, it's actually *TO BE made known* but it is expected that you know it.

C/D is not correct since *should* indicates only moral obligation and court of law cannot impose a moral obligation.

E ...they is not clear. also *THAT* is missing

A i just can't explain why A is wrong but i know that it is wrong.

If you have Manhattan SC guide, please refer to Page 49.

I think this is the reason why 'A' is wrong...

be - present subjunctive
are - second person singular / plural ; first & third person plural present indicative

require that - needs a subjunctive (contingent or hypothetical action)
CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3589
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 548

Kudos [?]: 3559 [0], given: 360

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2007, 13:21
Thanks again!

(OA is B)
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10535
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2014, 08:02
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of   [#permalink] 29 Jun 2014, 08:02
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 The United States has relaxed overseas borrowing rules 13 26 Feb 2015, 02:35
7 Local state regulations require that a company 3 09 May 2014, 01:19
Here is a kind of rule, may be halp to many..... In the 0 30 Sep 2008, 19:11
8 Q.The rules may require 1,000 or more makers of drugs, 4 25 Feb 2013, 04:33
2 Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of 6 12 Jun 2011, 11:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.