Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 02:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Jumbotrash Co., the country’s largest waste-disposal company

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 6
GMAT Date: 09-08-2013
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Jumbotrash Co., the country’s largest waste-disposal company [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2012, 19:46
Jumbotrash Co., the country’s largest waste-disposal company, has been sued by environmental groups who have accused the firm of negligent handling of hazardous waste. The fines and legal fees that have resulted from the legal attacks against Jumbotrash have cost the company substantial amounts of money. Surprisingly, as successful lawsuits against the company have increased in number, the company has grown stronger and more profitable.

Which one of the following, if true, does the most to resolve the apparent paradox?

(A) Although waste-disposal firms merely handle but do not generate toxic waste, these firms have been held legally responsible for environmental damage caused by this waste.

(B) Jumbotrash has made substantial contributions to environmental causes, as have other large waste-disposal companies.

(C) Some of the judgments against Jumbotrash have legally barred it from entering the more profitable areas of the waste-management business.

(D) The example of Jumbotrash’s legal entanglements has driven most of the company’s competitors from the field and deterred potential rivals from entering it.

(E) In cases in which Jumbotrash has been acquitted of charges of negligence, the company has paid more in legal fees than it would have been likely to pay in fines.

Last edited by dentobizz on 12 Nov 2013, 13:23, edited 1 time in total.
edited the Title
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 363
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 50

Reviews Badge
Re: Resolve the Paradox [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2012, 05:00
shahebali wrote:
Jumbotrash Co., the country’s largest waste-disposal company, has been sued by environmental groups who have accused the firm of negligent handling of hazardous waste. The fines and legal fees that have resulted from the legal attacks against Jumbotrash have cost the company substantial amounts of money. Surprisingly, as successful lawsuits against the company have increased in number, the company has grown stronger and more profitable.

Which one of the following, if true, does the most to resolve the apparent paradox?

(A) Although waste-disposal firms merely handle but do not generate toxic waste, these firms have been held legally responsible for environmental damage caused by this waste.

(B) Jumbotrash has made substantial contributions to environmental causes, as have other large waste-disposal companies.

(C) Some of the judgments against Jumbotrash have legally barred it from entering the more profitable areas of the waste-management business.

(D) The example of Jumbotrash’s legal entanglements has driven most of the company’s competitors from the field and deterred potential rivals from entering it.

(E) In cases in which Jumbotrash has been acquitted of charges of negligence, the company has paid more in legal fees than it would have been likely to pay in fines.


IMO D.
D brings out an alternate explanation to resolve the paradox. Since most of the company's rivals were out of the market, Jumbotrash were able to earn more profit despite of the substantial amount of fines.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Re: Resolve the Paradox   [#permalink] 04 Oct 2012, 05:00
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic Despite protests from some waste-disposal companies, state maybeam 13 14 Jul 2012, 01:54
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Of the countries that were the world s twenty largest whichscore 15 28 Mar 2011, 00:22
Of the countries that were the world s twenty largest rianah100 9 02 Dec 2005, 04:40
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Despite protests from some waste-disposal companies, state HongHu 48 11 Feb 2005, 14:40
Of the countries that were the world s twenty largest cloaked_vessel 1 28 Jan 2005, 11:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Jumbotrash Co., the country’s largest waste-disposal company

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.