Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 07:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2006, 12:35
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1270
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2006, 12:45
Going on a limb for this...

(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2006, 13:39
me too B.

the part of the sentence after the colon is in past tense. The part preceeding the colon should therefore be entirely in past perfect (to disambiguate the timing)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 634
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2006, 14:05
^ B ^

I would eliminate C, D and E as they have "it". What "it" refers to ??

A is out because it doesn't have a subject. It is not a complete sentence.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 49
Location: Big Apple
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2006, 17:44
selene wrote:
^ B ^

I would eliminate C, D and E as they have "it". What "it" refers to ??

A is out because it doesn't have a subject. It is not a complete sentence.


Can someone explain B, please....Looks like I was way off. Thanks.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1133
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2006, 19:07
B it should be.
As said earlier, the non-underlined portion is in past tense so we need the same tense in the underlined portion.
Secondly ,Selene correctly pointed out the ambiguity of 'it' in C,D and E.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2006, 23:06
can any one point out when do u we use "it" idiomatically without worrying about the pronoun reference error..

for example : It is a nice day.

so only in present tense can we use it idiomatically or some other rule is there ?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 49
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Jun 2006, 23:11
Was pulled towards Option A initially, but will go with Option B.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2006, 01:24
we can see a colon(:) in the question.
a colon is used when both the scentences are independent,
when they are dependent and and depend on one another we use a semicolon(;)
hence,B is the only scentecne that satisfies this condition and hence the answer is B :-D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2006, 06:49
Hi Selene,
Can you explain further as to why you have rejected A. I'm not clear with it.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Malaysia
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2006, 09:01
Beyondinfinity,

In expressions of time and weather antecedent of it is not given. Hope it is clear now.

e.g -- It is too hot today.
It is 2 o'clock

My choice - B

We use the past perfect tense for an action or situation that happened earlier, and the simple past tense for the action or situation that took place later. PAST PERFECT TENSE + SIMPLE PAST TENSE.

Here the 2nd clause denotes a more recent event - so use of past perfect is correct , hence option B.
_________________

Prachi Pareekh
http://gmat-grammar.blogspot.com

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2006, 09:11
Will go with B,

Only A and B stand out as "it" is incorrect here.
B is clear and uses the correct tense had
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 634
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2006, 15:01
zoom612 wrote:
Hi Selene,
Can you explain further as to why you have rejected A. I'm not clear with it.



Hi zoom612,

A hasn't got a subject, that's why I eliminated it :

"A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens.."

Before "did" we need a subject. A looks like this :

Because Jane failed the exam didn't want to see me.

Who didn't want to see me?? We need a subject here. So this sentence, just like A, is an incomplete one.

Hope this helps..
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2006, 15:22
"just because" is kind of a disaster start to a sentence... not the kind of GMAT language, so B and D are left

In D first clause is not finishied...

B is my answer
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 950
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: sc-king [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2006, 17:01
beyondinfinity wrote:
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he


I picked A :cry:
But selene's explanation is good, didn't even realize that A is missing a subject!
_________________

I believe its yogurt!

Re: sc-king   [#permalink] 23 Jun 2006, 17:01
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in Fig 2 23 Aug 2006, 00:16
17 Experts publish their posts in the topic Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in gmat_crack 35 20 Aug 2006, 09:37
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in mahesh004 0 17 Jun 2006, 19:45
2 Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in hellom3p 12 09 Mar 2006, 10:21
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in GMATT73 11 28 Jan 2006, 22:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.