Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 07 Feb 2016, 16:03
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1287
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 263 [1] , given: 0

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 02:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (01:46) correct 59% (00:55) wrong based on 651 sessions
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
9 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 496
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 120 [9] , given: 1

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 06:26
9
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
ritula wrote:
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he


I am going to try to use the split and resplit method I just studied from manhattan gmat.

First split, the action happened in 886 is before the past action in 893; therefore, past perfect is needed. So eliminate A, C, and D.

Second split, it does not have clear referent. So eliminate C, D, and E

The correct answer should be B. Total time used to answer this question 30secs.
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [2] , given: 7

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2010, 08:04
2
This post received
KUDOS
jainu wrote:
ritula wrote:
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he


answer should be B
3 actions: KA occupying and fortifying....I
KA winning loyality........II
Danes knowing the above facts.........III
III happened after I and II.
I and II happened at same time.
So there is difference in time of occurences of I,II event from III event.
Hence we use past perfect.



Thanks Jainu...A nice approach to solve multiple verb/tense questions in SC ..
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 97
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 70 [1] , given: 0

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 05:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
ritula wrote:
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he


answer should be B
3 actions: KA occupying and fortifying....I
KA winning loyality........II
Danes knowing the above facts.........III
III happened after I and II.
I and II happened at same time.
So there is difference in time of occurences of I,II event from III event.
Hence we use past perfect.
_________________

"The highest result of education is tolerance."

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1287
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 263 [1] , given: 0

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 24 Mar 2009, 05:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
Yes OA is B
1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 578
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Telecommunications)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 199 [1] , given: 404

GMAT ToolKit User Top 10 in overall CAT Tests
Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 30 Mar 2010, 07:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
I feel the fact that is wrong!!
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 43
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V35
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [1] , given: 3

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 27 Apr 2010, 07:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
RaviChandra wrote:
I feel the fact that is wrong!!


I also don't like the use of "the fact that." If it is a fact, why not just say so. I don't know what value does this idiom add to any sentence.

But the answer is B in this question, because of the errors in other options.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1916
Followers: 1762

Kudos [?]: 5564 [1] , given: 238

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink] New post 01 May 2012, 08:53
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi All,

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

Image

Since the meaning of the sentence is easy to understand let’s begin the POE. We will identify the errors in the sentence through POE itself.

Choice A: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he. Incorrect. This choice is incorrect because the verb “did not mean” does not have a subject and that leads to fragment.

Choice B: The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had. Correct. In this choice, verb “did not mean” has a subject “the fact” and that fact is that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886.

Choice C: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he. Incorrect. Pronoun “it” in this choice is referring to the entire preceding. This is incorrect because a pronoun cannot refer to anything but a noun or another pronoun.

Choice D: The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he. Incorrect. There are two errors here.
1. Subject “The fact” does not have a verb and hence we have a fragment here.
2. Pronoun “it” is again referring to the entire preceding clause.

Choice E: Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he. Incorrect. Pronoun “it” is again referring to the entire preceding clause.

PS: Notice that the chronology of the actions in this sentence is very clear. Mention of the specific years when the actions took place establish the sequence clearly. Still the use of past perfect is preferable here because the sentence says "the fact did not mean". If it said "the fact does not mean", then we could easily do with the simple past tense.

Image

1. When the sequence of the events is established by obvious markers, use of past perfect tense becomes optional.
2. Pronoun can only refer to a noun or another pronoun.
3. Every clause, independent or dependent must have subject-verb pair. Absence of any of the two leads to fragment error.

Hope this helps.

Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________

Aiming to score 760+ on the GMAT? Attend our free webinars to learn how to:

[*] Master Number Properties
[*] Ace Critical Reasoning

The webinars will start at 7 AM PST on the 11th and 12th of July, 2015.

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1916
Followers: 1762

Kudos [?]: 5564 [1] , given: 238

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink] New post 02 May 2012, 04:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
rohitgoel15 wrote:

Kudos for the explanation Shraddha ..
I have one question. What does the it refer to in the second portion:

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used itto their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he


Thanks for the Kudos.
The possessive "its" refers to "London" in this sentence. Citizens belong only a to country and there is just one country mentioned in the sentence before "its". Now, do not get confused to see a possessive pronoun referring to a non-possessive noun. It is absolutely fine for a possessive pronoun to refer to a non-possessive noun. However, a possessive noun cannot be referred to by a non-possessive pronoun.
For example, we cannot say: Lisa's cat is very pretty and she takes very good care of it.
In this sentence, non-possessive "she" cannot be used for possessive Lisa's.

Hope this helps.
Shraddha
_________________

Aiming to score 760+ on the GMAT? Attend our free webinars to learn how to:

[*] Master Number Properties
[*] Ace Critical Reasoning

The webinars will start at 7 AM PST on the 11th and 12th of July, 2015.

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 177

Kudos [?]: 286 [1] , given: 4

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2013, 08:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hi, yes you do need the second 'had'

The main sentence is the second part, after the colon.

The underlined section is all prior to the comma and is referring to that later action. So everything in that section happened before the main part of the sentence, so all needs the 'had'

Clear?
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 652 [0], given: 1

Top 10 in overall
Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 02:33
ritula wrote:
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he


B, tired now, tomorow explain :-D
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 914
Followers: 59

Kudos [?]: 367 [0], given: 17

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 02:45
IMHO, "had occupied" is not needed
why not A then?


(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 914
Followers: 59

Kudos [?]: 367 [0], given: 17

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 07:40
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 137
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 20:17
So OA is B?

The explanation seems valid but recently I read a question that talked about an 'age' and we didnt use had eventhough we had 2 past events. The discussion said that 'had' was not required because talking about an age was like introducing a new clause in the sentence.

Here I thought the colon introduces a new clause so the first two events dont form a chronology witht he event after the colon.

I thought it was A but I will be content with B if it is the OA.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2010
Posts: 37
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Reviews Badge
Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2010, 12:05
Nevergiveup---where did you find the split and resplit methond in the Manhattan GMAT SC book? I can't fidn it in the book..

Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Location: INDIA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 4

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2010, 19:43
misterchipper wrote:
Nevergiveup---where did you find the split and resplit methond in the Manhattan GMAT SC book? I can't fidn it in the book..

Thanks


it is their in book in chap-3.

Ans: B
_________________

MBA (Mind , Body and Attitude )

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 222
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 8

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2010, 23:24
I also used the tense logic and arrive at B.
Can anyone can comment on the "Just Because" or "The fact that"?

Are both okay on GMAT or is one preferable to another?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1627
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 653 [0], given: 2

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 05 Sep 2010, 03:06
Why do we need past perfect if the timeline is already clarified (years 886 and 893)?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 65
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

Re: SCV: King Alfred [#permalink] New post 31 Mar 2011, 05:22
Nevergiveup : nice explanantion, i liked the elimination strategy.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: I will not stop until i realise my goal which is my dream too
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 235
Schools: Johnson '15
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 16

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2012, 06:11
I too liked the MAHATTAN Elimination method...I would go with B too
_________________

Regards,
Harsha

Note: Give me kudos if my approach is right , else help me understand where i am missing.. I want to bell the GMAT Cat ;)

Satyameva Jayate - Truth alone triumphs

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in   [#permalink] 04 Apr 2012, 06:11

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 37 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in sreehari1250 6 06 Sep 2009, 08:51
1 Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in jitendra 8 07 Oct 2008, 09:12
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in businessm 5 17 Jul 2008, 05:15
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in mahesh004 0 17 Jun 2006, 19:45
2 Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in hellom3p 12 09 Mar 2006, 10:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.