Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Sep 2016, 14:36
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 119 [1] , given: 1

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2009, 09:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

38% (02:10) correct 63% (01:05) wrong based on 85 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

30. Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.
(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 105
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 13 [1] , given: 2

Reviews Badge
Re: King Alfred [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2009, 21:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
'does second had in 'B' required?

because occupied and fortified occured before King had the chance to win the support of the people. Are these being considred concurrent? If concurrent then had is not required the simple past tense would do the work?

in C, D and E -> it seems not have antecedent or refering to fact in D (which is wrong?).

Can anyone explain in details?

picking 'A'
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: King Alfred [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2010, 19:59
I rejected A since with just because you cannot have did not. you should have does not.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 82 [1] , given: 5

Re: King Alfred [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2010, 10:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
B is correct.. proper tense and construction, no use of ambiguous 'it" and "Just because"
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 513 [1] , given: 6

Re: King Alfred [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2010, 15:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
B it is.

The below explanation might help.

Quote:
The correct answer is B, thus containing two "hads":

The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

Sequence of events:

886: King Alfred occupies and fortifies London and potentially wins the loyalty of citizens
893: Danes invade

Since 893 is in the simple past (Danes WERE), both events of 886, which is prior to 893, should be in the past perfect (HAD occupied, HAD won).
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 125
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 47

Re: King Alfred [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2010, 16:00
I remember this question from MGMAT I missed it:))

B
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 707
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 37

Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2011, 19:04
+1 for B.

Two events happened earlier:
1) King Alfred occupied London
2) King Alfred didn't win loyalty of his people despite occupation and fortification.

One event happened after that (also in past):
1) Danes were aware of the earlier events and used it for their advantage.

We need past perfect for earlier set of events(both of them) and simple past for the following past event to ensure clarity in timelines of events.

Crick
Re: Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in   [#permalink] 07 Nov 2011, 19:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in TGC 3 29 Dec 2012, 09:24
30 Experts publish their posts in the topic Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in ritula 38 23 Mar 2009, 03:21
1 Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in jitendra 8 07 Oct 2008, 10:12
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in businessm 5 17 Jul 2008, 06:15
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in tarek99 3 21 Jan 2008, 04:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.