K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, : GMAT Data Sufficiency (DS)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 03:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 276
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 181 [2] , given: 2

K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2010, 05:30
2
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

66% (01:25) correct 34% (00:39) wrong based on 369 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K. Is 100 in K?

(1) 50 is in K.
(2) 150 is in K.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....

Last edited by Bunuel on 04 Aug 2012, 02:39, edited 1 time in total.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36625
Followers: 7103

Kudos [?]: 93618 [0], given: 10583

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2010, 05:40
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
dkverma wrote:
K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K. Is 100 in K?
(1) 50 is in K.
(2) 150 is in K.

(1) 50 is in K --> integers more than or equal to 50 are in the set K, so 100 is in the K. Sufficient.

(2) 150 is in K --> integers more than or equal to 150 are in the set K, so 100 may or may not be in the K (if the source integer is 100 or less then 100 is in K but if the source integer is more than 100 then 100 is not in K). Not sufficient.

Similar questions:
ds-p-is-a-set-of-integers-96630.html
og-quant-96907.html

Hope it helps.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2010
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2010, 06:14
questions such as the one above never mention the total number of terms in the set , wouldnt that matter , say if the set were to contain only 10 integers or say 50 , the answer to the question might change ....?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 805
Location: London
Followers: 105

Kudos [?]: 958 [5] , given: 25

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2010, 14:24
5
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
questions such as the one above never mention the total number of terms in the set , wouldnt that matter , say if the set were to contain only 10 integers or say 50 , the answer to the question might change ....?

Not really, because the way the set is defined, it will always be either the empty set or an infinite set.

If the set contains any integer, it will have to contain all the integers greater than or equal to that integer. So the question of having exactly 50 or 100 integers never arises
_________________
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 401
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 76

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2010, 22:18
shrouded1 wrote:
questions such as the one above never mention the total number of terms in the set , wouldnt that matter , say if the set were to contain only 10 integers or say 50 , the answer to the question might change ....?

Not really, because the way the set is defined, it will always be either the empty set or an infinite set.

If the set contains any integer, it will have to contain all the integers greater than or equal to that integer. So the question of having exactly 50 or 100 integers never arises

Well, that is some valuable information. Thank you and +1.
Intern
Status: Work hard, Play harder!
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 20
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 19

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2010, 22:54
Guys, would you mind explaining the solution bit more. How can 100 be in set, if 50 is in K. Wouldn't r+1, i.e., 51 should be there? Thanks!
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 805
Location: London
Followers: 105

Kudos [?]: 958 [1] , given: 25

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2010, 23:19
1
KUDOS
vibhutirs wrote:
Guys, would you mind explaining the solution bit more. How can 100 be in set, if 50 is in K. Wouldn't r+1, i.e., 51 should be there? Thanks!

If r is in the set, r+1 will be in it.
So if 50 is in the set, 51 will be in it
If 51 is in the set, by the same logic, 52 will be in it
If 52 is in the set, 53 will be in it .... AND SO ON

So basically what the condition implies is if r is in the set, all the integers greater than r will also have to be in the set. Hence, 50 being in there is sufficient for 100 to be in there. But 150 being in there, is not necessarily sufficient
_________________
Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 44
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 04-21-2013
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2012, 01:55
From 1
If 50 is in a part of K then 51 is a part of k and if 51 is a part of k then 52 is also a part of k
so the possible values of k are k>=50

From 2
k>=150

so from 1 we can say that 100 is a part of k but from 2 we are not sure if it is contains 100 or not...

Ans: A)
_________________

KPV

Intern
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 30
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT Date: 01-17-2014
GPA: 3.84
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 91

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2013, 05:31
Bunuel,
Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be
if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred.
if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0.
But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100?
I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36625
Followers: 7103

Kudos [?]: 93618 [0], given: 10583

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2013, 07:24
mumbijoh wrote:
Bunuel,
Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be
if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred.
if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0.
But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100?
I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no?

We know that if r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K.

(1) says that 50 is in K, thus every integer more than 50 is also in K: 51 because 50 is there, 52 because 51 is there, ..., 100 because 99 is there.

Similar questions to practice:
for-a-certain-set-of-numbers-if-x-is-in-the-set-then-both-161920.html
for-a-certain-set-of-numbers-if-x-is-in-the-set-then-x-136580.html
a-set-of-numbers-has-the-property-that-for-any-number-t-in-t-98829.html
if-p-is-a-set-of-integers-and-3-is-in-p-is-every-positive-96630.html
k-is-a-set-of-numbers-such-that-i-if-x-is-in-k-then-x-96907.html

Hope this helps.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 57

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2013, 10:50
Bunuel wrote:
mumbijoh wrote:
Bunuel,
Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be
if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred.
if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0.
But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100?
I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no?

We know that if r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K.

(1) says that 50 is in K, thus every integer more than 50 is also in K: 51 because 50 is there, 52 because 51 is there, ..., 100 because 99 is there.

Similar questions to practice:
for-a-certain-set-of-numbers-if-x-is-in-the-set-then-both-161920.html
for-a-certain-set-of-numbers-if-x-is-in-the-set-then-x-136580.html
a-set-of-numbers-has-the-property-that-for-any-number-t-in-t-98829.html
if-p-is-a-set-of-integers-and-3-is-in-p-is-every-positive-96630.html
k-is-a-set-of-numbers-such-that-i-if-x-is-in-k-then-x-96907.html

Hope this helps.

Hi Bunuel,

Can you explain again why B is insufficient? If 150 is in K, 151, .152... resulting from ( r + 1) also is in K. That means 100 will be out of K because K includes only value > 150. B helps to always answer: NO (100 is always NOT in K: Sufficient).

Thanks.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36625
Followers: 7103

Kudos [?]: 93618 [1] , given: 10583

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2013, 10:58
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
yenpham9 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
mumbijoh wrote:
Bunuel,
Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be
if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred.
if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0.
But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100?
I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no?

We know that if r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K.

(1) says that 50 is in K, thus every integer more than 50 is also in K: 51 because 50 is there, 52 because 51 is there, ..., 100 because 99 is there.

Similar questions to practice:
for-a-certain-set-of-numbers-if-x-is-in-the-set-then-both-161920.html
for-a-certain-set-of-numbers-if-x-is-in-the-set-then-x-136580.html
a-set-of-numbers-has-the-property-that-for-any-number-t-in-t-98829.html
if-p-is-a-set-of-integers-and-3-is-in-p-is-every-positive-96630.html
k-is-a-set-of-numbers-such-that-i-if-x-is-in-k-then-x-96907.html

Hope this helps.

Hi Bunuel,

Can you explain again why B is insufficient? If 150 is in K, 151, .152... resulting from ( r + 1) also is in K. That means 100 will be out of K because K includes only value > 150. B helps to always answer: NO (100 is always NOT in K: Sufficient).

Thanks.

We don't know which is the source integer in the set, if it's 150, then 100 won't be in the set but if the source integer is say 10 or 20 (basically if the source integer is less than or equal to 100), then 100 will be in the set. So, 100 may or may not be in the set. Consider below two examples of the set:

{150, 151, 152, ...}
{1, 2, 3, 4, ..., 100, ..., 150, ...}

Notice that both sets satisfy the second statement.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 63
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Other
GMAT Date: 07-31-2014
GPA: 3.99
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [1] , given: 6

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2014, 09:49
1
KUDOS
If r is in K, r+1 is in K. So if 50 is in K, 51 is in K. But if 51 is in K, so is 52, and then so is 53, and so on. Indeed, if you know 50 is in K, you know that every positive integer larger than 50 must also be in K. So 1) is sufficient.

If 150 is in K, all we know for certain is that every positive integer greater than or equal to 150 must be in K. We don't know if 100 is in K. So 2) is insufficient.

Thus, A.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13537
Followers: 577

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2015, 03:01
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 70

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2015, 08:11
Bunuel wrote:
mumbijoh wrote:
Bunuel,
Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be
if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred.
if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0.
But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100?
I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no?

We know that if r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K.

(1) says that 50 is in K, thus every integer more than 50 is also in K: 51 because 50 is there, 52 because 51 is there, ..., 100 because 99 is there.

Hope this helps.

How can the logic be applied to only one statement
Assuming if r is in the set the r+1 must be in the set as well.
(1) 50 is in the set
(1,2,3,4........50) or
(10,11,12.......50) or no 100
(50, 51, 52.........100....) yes 100

(2) 150 is in the set
(1,2,3,4.......100,101...150) or yes 100
(20,21,22,23.........150) or yes 100
(150, 151, 152.........) no 100

my question is what works Bunuel ?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36625
Followers: 7103

Kudos [?]: 93618 [0], given: 10583

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2015, 09:31
Methylik wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
mumbijoh wrote:
Bunuel,
Hi I understood your explanation.However , I think if you were to classify statement 2 as insufficient then statement 1 would also be
if 50 is in set the 51,is also in the ,same as 52...... all the way to a hundred.
if 150 is in set then 149 must have been part of the set, 148 .. all the way to possibly 0.
But following your explanation you mentioned in statement two that there is no way of knowing if 100 was part of the set? Well i agree with you but how are we to know if statement 1 goes all the way to 100?
I was thinking that E would have been the answer.no?

We know that if r is in K, then r + 1 is also in K.

(1) says that 50 is in K, thus every integer more than 50 is also in K: 51 because 50 is there, 52 because 51 is there, ..., 100 because 99 is there.

Hope this helps.

How can the logic be applied to only one statement
Assuming if r is in the set the r+1 must be in the set as well.
(1) 50 is in the set
(1,2,3,4........50) or
(10,11,12.......50) or no 100
(50, 51, 52.........100....) yes 100

(2) 150 is in the set
(1,2,3,4.......100,101...150) or yes 100
(20,21,22,23.........150) or yes 100
(150, 151, 152.........) no 100

my question is what works Bunuel ?

Check here: k-is-a-set-of-integers-such-that-if-the-integer-r-is-in-k-103005.html#p1297315
_________________
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13537
Followers: 577

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2016, 05:44
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K,   [#permalink] 19 Oct 2016, 05:44
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 If k is a positive integer, is k an integer? 7 22 Jun 2015, 16:35
11 If k is an integer, is k even? 16 18 Feb 2015, 03:47
6 If 90/k is an integer, is k an integer? 11 06 Jul 2011, 07:05
K is a set of integers such that if the integer r is in K, 4 23 Aug 2010, 07:56
33 If k is an integer greater than 1, is k equal to 2^r for 25 29 Dec 2009, 09:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by