Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Jun 2013, 17:23
Customize  |  Hide

Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Jun 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2012, 21:17
00:00

Question Stats:

80% (02:12) correct 20% (01:21) wrong based on 65 sessions
Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since collard greens have more nutritional value than lettuce, if follows that kale has more nutritional value than lettuce.

Any of the following, if introduced into the argument as an additional premise, makes the argument above logically correct EXCEPT:


A. Collard greens have more nutritional value than kale
B. Spinach has more nutritional value than lettuce
C. Spinach has more nutritional value than collard greens
D. Spinach and collard greens have the same nutritional value
E. Kale and collard greens have the same nutritional value
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2012
Posts: 3
Concentration: Economics, Technology
GMAT Date: 08-07-2012
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 24

Re: Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since [#permalink] New post 24 Jun 2012, 09:37
Answer is A. As other options support the argument
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Followers: 200

Kudos [?]: 230 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since [#permalink] New post 24 Jun 2012, 19:56
A good strategy is to set up a little diagram, in which you position the different vegetables.

Kale > Spinach Collard Greens > Lettuce

Conclusion: Kale > Lettuce

We can go through each answer choice and see which one does not reinforce the diagram above.

Starting with (A) we can see that if collard greens have more nutritional value than kale, then there is no way we can determine whether kale is healthier than lettuce:

Collard Greens > Lettuce > Kale
Collard Greens > Kale > Lettuce

Either scenario is valid. However, the first scenario goes against the conclusion and is therefore the answer.

Hope that helps :).
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image

Manager
Manager
Status: Trying to get 720+ - DIDN'T GIVE UP !!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 184
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 95

GMAT Tests User CAT Tests
Re: Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2012, 08:10
Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since collard greens have more nutritional value than lettuce, if follows that kale has more nutritional value than lettuce.
Any of the following, if introduced into the argument as an additional premise, makes the argument above logically correct EXCEPT:

Let K = Kale
S = Spinach
C = Collard
L = lettuce
Given :
1) K >S
2)C>L
Conclusion
3)K>L

A. Collard greens have more nutritional value than kale
The choice says : C >K ... (a)
From (1) , (2) and (a)
C>L
C>K>S
From this we can't conclude that C>K. This may be true, may not be true. We don't know. Hence (A) can't be the additinal premise. Hence (A) is the answer.
B. Spinach has more nutritional value than lettuce
The choice says : S > L .... (b)
From (1) and (b)
K>S>L
Hence K>L ... which is the conclusion. Hence this choice can be the additional premise.
C. Spinach has more nutritional value than collard greens
The choice says : S > C ....(c)
From (1) , (2)and ( c)
K>S>C>L
Hence K>L ... which is the conclusion. Hence this choice can be the additional premise.
D. Spinach and collard greens have the same nutritional value
The choice says : S = C ....(d)
From (1) , (2)and ( d)
K>S=C>L
Hence K>L ... which is the conclusion. Hence this choice can be the additional premise.
E. Kale and collard greens have the same nutritional value
The choice says : K=C ....(e)
From (2)and ( e)
K=C>L
Hence K>L ... which is the conclusion. Hence this choice can be the additional premise.

+++++++++++++++

Also , refer to kale-has-more-nutritional-value-than-spinach-but-since-12458.html?hilit=Kale%20has%20more%20nutritional%20value%20than%20spinach.%20But%20since
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 566
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 75

Re: Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2012, 03:47
DS question with a little bit of IR:-)

Is K>L?

(i)K>S
(ii) C>L

(A) shows C>K but C is already greater than L so, can't say if K>L.

(A) Wins
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Re: Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since   [#permalink] 12 Jul 2012, 03:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since qhoc0010 7 20 Dec 2004, 07:37
New posts Wheat has more nutritional value than rye. But since oats saurya_s 6 01 Feb 2005, 08:28
New posts Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did jlui4477 4 20 Apr 2006, 17:31
New posts Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did LM 2 17 Jun 2007, 19:42
Popular new posts Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did sondenso 11 15 May 2008, 01:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.