Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Apr 2014, 14:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2008, 21:03
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

60% (01:43) correct 40% (00:22) wrong based on 5 sessions
Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in the U.S. Senate in 1992, said she did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones.

(A) did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones
(B) wished not so much for more senators who were women than moderate Republicans
(C) did not wish so much for more women senators as for more moderate Republicans
(D) did not wish for more women senators so much as moderate Republicans
(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women

Please explain the answers !!!
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: SC-kansas [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2008, 21:33
Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in the U.S. Senate in 1992, said she did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones.

(A) did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones
(B) wished not so much for more senators who were women than moderate Republicans
(C) did not wish so much for more women senators as for more moderate Republicans-MEANING DISTORTED
(D) did not wish for more women senators so much as moderate Republicans-||LISM LACKING
(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women


IMO E

I M NOT SURE BUT ALL OTHERS SEEM AWKWARD TO ME
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 329
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC-kansas [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2008, 21:34
IMO C.

A. you need " for" after but
E. you need "for" after than
C. has the "but"
VP
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC-kansas [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2008, 08:50
OA is C
Anyways i would like to know the flaw in E
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2008
Posts: 111
Location: Dallas, TX
Schools: McCombs 2011
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

Re: SC-kansas [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2008, 13:44
spriya wrote:
OA is C
Anyways i would like to know the flaw in E


(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women

E changes the meaning saying that she outright wished for more moderate Republicans than women. But the original sentece says she would rather wish for more moderate Republicans than women. Sorry, this is my best explanation
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1893
Location: Oklahoma City
Schools: Hard Knocks
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 398 [0], given: 32

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC-kansas [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2008, 13:53
E changes the meaning. In the original, Kassebaum is wishing for one general thing: Senators, but wishing for different types of them. She doesn't want just women senators, she wants them to be moderate Republican ones.

How does E change this meaning?

In E, she wished for one thing: senators that are moderate Republicans. E presents the alternative as "women".

E tries to imply "than women [senators]." but doesn't get the job done. It is not clear. In E, Kassebaum seems to be wishing for moderate Republicans that are women OR men, but in the original sentence, she is wishing for women that are moderate REpublicans.

spriya wrote:
Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in the U.S. Senate in 1992, said she did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones.

(A) did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones
(B) wished not so much for more senators who were women than moderate Republicans
(C) did not wish so much for more women senators as for more moderate Republicans
(D) did not wish for more women senators so much as moderate Republicans
(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women

Please explain the answers !!!

_________________

------------------------------------
J Allen Morris
**I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$.

VP
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC-kansas [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2008, 18:14
jallenmorris wrote:
E changes the meaning. In the original, Kassebaum is wishing for one general thing: Senators, but wishing for different types of them. She doesn't want just women senators, she wants them to be moderate Republican ones.

How does E change this meaning?

In E, she wished for one thing: senators that are moderate Republicans. E presents the alternative as "women".

E tries to imply "than women [senators]." but doesn't get the job done. It is not clear. In E, Kassebaum seems to be wishing for moderate Republicans that are women OR men, but in the original sentence, she is wishing for women that are moderate REpublicans.

spriya wrote:
Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in the U.S. Senate in 1992, said she did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones.

(A) did not so much wish for more women senators but more moderate Republican ones
(B) wished not so much for more senators who were women than moderate Republicans
(C) did not wish so much for more women senators as for more moderate Republicans
(D) did not wish for more women senators so much as moderate Republicans
(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women

Please explain the answers !!!

1)She didnt wish so much for x as for y
2)she wished for y rather than for x

3)she wished for more z who are y than x

1) , 2) are same
but 3)is not .

got it .
good explanation
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Re: SC-kansas   [#permalink] 08 Aug 2008, 18:14
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts With a population equal to Kansas in an area one coffeeloverfreak 2 03 Sep 2005, 19:37
New posts Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in celiaXDN 6 24 Oct 2005, 08:34
New posts Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in mahesh004 1 17 Jun 2006, 19:44
New posts 469 Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women deep 7 10 Sep 2006, 22:51
Popular new posts 11 Experts publish their posts in the topic A furniture manufacturer has two machines, but only one can priyankur_saha@ml.com 21 05 May 2009, 20:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Kansas Republican Nancy Kassebaum, one of only two women in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.