Recently, I begin preparing GMAT test by studying a series of Kaplan
and Princeton. But, I find the two series of workbooks have substantially
different in attacking approach of verbal questions.
However, I, non-native English, easily seem to digest for the Princeton's method. Yet, I watch some suggestion from this website by bb written. He think the kaplan
's approach has more efficient than the princeton's approach.
In fact, I am confused how to select tackling way effectively for verbal secion.
I can pretty much only repeat myself about the Kaplan
books - they are better than Princeton's.
I found Princeton Quite different in logic from the real thing, even more different than kaplan
- which matters much more in Verbal (CR, SC, RC) than in Math.
Anybody else wants to speak up?