Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 01:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Kernland and unprocessed cashews

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 0

Kernland and unprocessed cashews [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2004, 13:38
1
This post received
KUDOS
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the exports of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. if the tarriff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world markets prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. however, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tarriff would seriously hamper the goververnment's efforts to reduce urban unemployment over the nesxt five years

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument

C. more people in kenland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them

E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in kernland off their land and into the Cities

Which is the correct answer, E or C
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 577
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [1] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Kernland and unprocessed cashews [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2004, 14:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
I will go with E
If E is correct, then it clearly says that the Govt is unable to identify the root cause of the unemployment problem. If tarriffs are lifted -> unemployment will reduce as people will be attracted to farming again. Hence imposing tarriffs will not help much in the goververnment's efforts to reduce unemployment. Instead ... it can get worse!
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 96
Location: Santa Clara
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2004, 17:18
1
This post received
KUDOS
Agreed. E
_________________

"Do or do not, there is no try."
-Yoda

1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 143 [1] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2004, 18:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
E weakens the statement. If famrers are going to cities as well, then concern should be focuse on urban employment rather than increasing farming profits.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 Sep 2004, 23:07
I thought the argument here is removing the tarriff would seriously hamper the goververnment's efforts to reduce urban unemployment over the nesxt five years. if there is a condition which shows that the government can remove the tarrif and have little consequence, as C demostrates, then that weekens the argument.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2004, 09:10
sdanquah wrote:
I thought the argument here is removing the tarriff would seriously hamper the goververnment's efforts to reduce urban unemployment over the nesxt five years. if there is a condition which shows that the government can remove the tarrif and have little consequence, as C demostrates, then that weekens the argument.

What tells you that the fact that more people working in the coutryside than will hurt the government only a little bit if the latter removes the tarriff? Since unprocessed cashews are what affect market prices, the processing of cashews at urban plants could have no incidence on world market prices. Removing the tarriff could unfairly favor rural areas to the expense of urban ones. Thus, the government plan of reducing unemployment rate in cities could be greatly reduced. There is just nothing that says there will be little consequence by removing the tarriff.
E is best as if workers now massively shift to urban areas, then urban unemployement will NOT be a concern anymore. Hence, removing tarriffs will increase export and will also decrease urban unemployment. This directly contradicts the whole argument
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 941
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [1] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
cashews cr [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2006, 14:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment
over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.

B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.

C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.

D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.

E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

The assumption is that the removal of the tariff will allow the farmers to sell at a higher price. therefore, they would grow more cashews. The result will be that the processing plants can't buy at those prices and will ahve to close down. I think the answer is D
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 256
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [1] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2006, 19:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
C is the correct answer
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 92
Location: Minneapolis
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2006, 22:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
E it should be.
C does not address the urban unemployment problem.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 662
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2006, 06:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
I go with C.
This is because the argument says that if tariff is lifted, more people in urban centres will lose jobs. Here, author has assumed that most people are in the plants rather than being farmers. So if C is true, it weakens the argument
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2006, 07:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
I will go for E as the concern is about the unemployment in urban areas
  [#permalink] 23 Mar 2006, 07:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed piyushksharma 1 21 Apr 2012, 11:39
1 Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed raviram80 5 27 Feb 2012, 21:50
11 Experts publish their posts in the topic Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed reply2spg 33 20 Feb 2009, 18:56
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed alimad 6 15 Jun 2008, 17:35
12 Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed jerrywu 12 27 Aug 2006, 03:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Kernland and unprocessed cashews

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.