Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 14:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Kernland [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2010, 10:33
C and E both seem to work but E is a better choice over C.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Kernland [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2010, 05:29
I Still feel D should be the answer.

D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew
processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.

This scenerio is helping both farmers and processing units ( thus improving urban employment)
_________________


R E S P E C T


Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 197
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 15

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: CR: Kernland [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2010, 06:29
OK E seems right.

Removed tarrif would hinder farmers from moving to urban area, as they would stay in the countryside in order to plant cashew - therefore help government to fight against unemployment.
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 90
Schools: Wharton..:)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 14

Re: CR: Kernland [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2010, 06:27
conclusion – removing the tariff would SERIOUSLY hamper govt’s effort to reduce unemployment bcoz if high tariff;s are lifted thm ppl in the urban areas whr all the processing plants are thr would not get any business.

Option E - is the only viable option coz if the crops are not profitable thn farmers will migrate to cities and increase unemployment rates, however we do have to assume tht farmers migrating to cities will not find jobs!

option C- well if more people are growing thn processing ,thn if u remove the tarrif it still creates job shortages in THE URBAN area so it's no way weakening the conclusion .
_________________

" What [i] do is not beyond anybody else's competence"- warren buffett
My Gmat experience -http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-710-q-47-v-41-tips-for-non-natives-107086.html

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 2

Re: CR: Kernland [#permalink] New post 29 Dec 2010, 14:11
very confusing one.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 261
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 20

Re: CR: Kernland [#permalink] New post 14 Jan 2012, 04:21
cialit0506 wrote:
OA is E...

But, I still don't know why D is wrong :(


The whole point in the argument is about unemployment. As per D, there won;t be unemployment and hence it SUPPORTs government action.

About C:
More people are in farming whereas some people are in processing industry. Now, if by lifting the tariffs, those farmers are allowed to export, the remaining people would loose their jobs in the processing industry. Hence this option supports the govt action.

But in E: though it is talking about growing crops 'in general', in the absence of any other choice, this is considered as the 'best' option.
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2009
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Kernland [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2012, 15:06
KissGMAT wrote:
I Still feel D should be the answer.

D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew
processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.

This scenerio is helping both farmers and processing units ( thus improving urban employment)


I think D is wrong because it says cashew processing in KernLand will benefit for the low price input and the unemployment there might not increase. However the argument focuses on urban unemployment. We can deduce that because the KernLand processing industry prosper, the urban processing industry go down because it cannot buy cashew from KernLand, then urban unemployment go up. --> strengthen the argument.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Do till 740 :)
Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 113
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 460 Q35 V20
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 19

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink] New post 13 Apr 2012, 22:50
I think this is what happens when we try to solve un official questions

We narrow down to C and E

though E is better i eliminated it cos it was talking about crops and not specifically cashew.

We could argue whether cashew comes under crop or not and whether just cos more people are involved in crops does it mean that cashew is also part of it?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink] New post 14 Apr 2012, 01:47
shankar245 wrote:
I think this is what happens when we try to solve un official questions

We narrow down to C and E

though E is better i eliminated it cos it was talking about crops and not specifically cashew.

We could argue whether cashew comes under crop or not and whether just cos more people are involved in crops does it mean that cashew is also part of it?


Very Confusing ..I Still go with C ..need clarity
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 49
Location: Sydney
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Kernland [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2012, 21:41
cialit0506 wrote:
OA is E...

But, I still don't know why D is wrong :(


D is wrong because it doesn't weaken the argument.

The argument here is that removal of tariff will raise unemployment rate in urban areas (something that the government is trying to combat). The correct answers will be something that can show that urban unemployment will not worsen if the tariff on exports is lifted. D does not provide any argument along these lines. I felt that it is out of scope in fact.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 91
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 43

Kernland cashew nuts [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2013, 01:32
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2445
Followers: 312

Kudos [?]: 2625 [0], given: 697

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2013, 02:58
Expert's post
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 91
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 43

Re: Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2013, 03:48
carcass wrote:
Merged similar topic.

See the above explanation.

regards


The forum automatically merges them or you merged them?
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Attending Duke in May!
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 32
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 18

Re: Kernland cashew nuts [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 00:22
score780 wrote:
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.


Remember for CR questions that involve weakening or strengthening we need to focus on the argument (conclusion)

Conclusion: Since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years

So we're looking for a statement that will weaken the argument that removing the tariff's would hamper the effort to reduce unemployment.

Remember in CR questions all the statements in the passage are considered true unless otherwise stated.

Facts:
- The tariff's are driving the farmers to sell the cashews to domestic processing plants at lower than world market prices.
- If the tariff's were removed the farmers could sell at higher prices to world markets and profit more.

A.) Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. This doesn't tell us anything about the unemployment issue in the conclusion. It implies that the by-products of the cashews are keeping other plants open (the paints and plastics), so this will strengthen the argument slightly, but even still it's a stretch to infer that.

B.) Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants. This tells us that other countries governments are subsidizing processing plants to keep them open. This is a useless statement that neither strengthens nor weakens the argument.

C.) More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. This statement tells you about the ratio to farmers to processors. Farmers>Processors. This has no impact on the unemployment of the processors if the tariff's were removed. It only tells you if the tariff's were removed the smaller party would be impacted more, which is still undesirable. If we had 50,000 farmers and 49,500 processors, it's still a huge loss for Kernland and this statement could still be satisfied.

D.) Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. This statement strengthens the argument of the author. The tariff's MUST stay in place so that the Kernland processors can sell the cashews at a competitive price. This is the opposite of what we're looking for.

E.) A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities. BINGO! Exactly what we're looking for. It hits on both of our facts from the passage and finds another cause for the unemployment problem other than the conclusion that was stated. Fact from passage: The cashew sells are not profitable to the farmers. Effect - Because of this the farmers are coming into the city adding to the unemployment problem. If the tariff's were removed, the farmers could farm cashews and sell them for a higher profit, which would prevent them from moving into the urban areas creating less competition for jobs, which would lower the unemployment.
Re: Kernland cashew nuts   [#permalink] 17 Apr 2013, 00:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed piyushksharma 1 21 Apr 2012, 11:39
1 Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed raviram80 5 27 Feb 2012, 21:50
Country X imposes heavy tariffs on imported manufactured noboru 14 01 Aug 2009, 12:59
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed alimad 6 15 Jun 2008, 17:35
12 Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed jerrywu 12 27 Aug 2006, 03:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 34 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.