Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Sep 2014, 06:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1270
Location: Madrid
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2007, 09:16
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them yesterday. If the selling price of lot B was twice that of lot A, did Lana make a profit on the sale of these two lots?

(1) Lana sold lot A for 20% more than its purchase price.
(2) Lana sold lot B for more than 90% of its purchase price.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 908
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: DS: Lana's Lots [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2007, 09:42
kevincan wrote:
Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them yesterday. If the selling price of lot B was twice that of lot A, did Lana make a profit on the sale of these two lots?

(1) Lana sold lot A for 20% more than its purchase price.
(2) Lana sold lot B for more than 90% of its purchase price.


C:

1: we do not know about the purchase price of B. nsf.
2: we do not know about the purchase price of A. nsf.

1&2: we can sayt hat Lana made progit.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 128
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2007, 16:19
I would say E.

If lot B sold for exactly 90% of its purchase price, with the information from both statements, Lana took a loss. But we are told it sold for more than 90% of price, so it could be a profit depending on how much more than 90%. I plugged in a couple values and at 90% it's a loss.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 908
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: DS: Lana's Lots [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2007, 17:12
Thanks "Robin in NC". i am sure you got it.

I sleeped on 90%, which i assumed as 190%, in B. with 90%, it is perfectly make sense to go with E.


Himalayan wrote:
kevincan wrote:
Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them yesterday. If the selling price of lot B was twice that of lot A, did Lana make a profit on the sale of these two lots?

(1) Lana sold lot A for 20% more than its purchase price.
(2) Lana sold lot B for more than 90% of its purchase price.


C:

1: we do not know about the purchase price of B. nsf.
2: we do not know about the purchase price of A. nsf.

1&2: we can sayt hat Lana made progit.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2007, 18:40
Isn't the question just concerned about answer to the below question:
Did lana make a profit?

(A) and (B) together enable us to answer the question. The answer should be (C).
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2007, 21:39
Let selling price of B be B and selling price of A be A

B = 2A

St1:
A = 1.2a. Although we know B = 2A, but we don't know if the purchase price of B is much higher than 2A. Insufficient.

St2:
B > 0.9b. We do not know if she sold A at a great profit though. Insufficient.

using st1 and st2:
If a = 10, then A = 12, and B = 24. 24> 0.9b--> 26>b. If b is 25.9, then overall profit = 0.1. Overall, Lana should make a profit.

Ans C
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3404
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2007, 11:24
OK at first I thought it was E...but now I am sure its E...

here is say A=selling Price of PropertyA, B=selling Price of Property B

a=purchase price of Property A, b=purchase price of Property B.

B=2A.

1) A=1.2a
insuff

2) B>0.9b

insuff

together...lets see

suppose a=10 ; A=12 therefore B=24

ok lets look at worse case scenario she sells for 0.900001b

so if 0.9b=24 then b=25.9999

net loss from b=26.666-24.00=2.66

profit from property A is 2...

2-2.66=0.66 loss...

however if she sells for higher than 90% then she could potentially make a profit on both..all she needs to sell is the property for 91% of b...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 128
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2007, 14:34
I still think it's E.

We know that if she sold the second property for 90% it's a loss, and even if at 91% it's a profit, we don't know that she sold it for 91%. All we know is she sold it for more than 90% - it could be 90.0001%. So we can't know if it was a profit or a loss.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2007, 14:51
my answer is C. use the method similar to fresinha12's.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 583
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2007, 15:44
I think we are getting confused with the varbage of statement 2.

"Lana sold lot B for more than 90% of its purchase price."

Depends on how you interpret it .
If you interpret
Lana made 90% profit on purchased price : answer is C
and
If you interpret
Lana made more than 90% profit on purchased priced : answer is E .

Here we know Lana made more than 90% of its purchases price and that could be 91 92...anything . So answer has to be E.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 583
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2007, 15:46
I think we had enough of discussion . OA Please :?: :)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 908
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2007, 16:49
kevincan wrote:
Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them yesterday. If the selling price of lot B was twice that of lot A, did Lana make a profit on the sale of these two lots?
(1) Lana sold lot A for 20% more than its purchase price.
(2) Lana sold lot B for more than 90% of its purchase price.


ashkrs wrote:
I think we had enough of discussion . OA Please :?: :)


Let me clearify myself:
CP (A) = a
SP (A) = 1.2a
SP (B) = 2.4a
CP(B) = 2.4a/.9 = 8a/3
so the profit (losss) = SP - CP
= (1.2a + 2.4a) - (a + 8a/3)
= 3.6a - 11a/3
= (10.8a - 11a)/3
= - 0.2a/3

if we consider SP (B) as 92.31% of its CP, then there would be no loss no gain.

if SP (B) is > 92.31% of its purchase price, the profit is +ve. so the statements are insufficient and its E.
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1270
Location: Madrid
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Re: DS: Lana's Lots [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2007, 23:49
kevincan wrote:
Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them yesterday. If the selling price of lot B was twice that of lot A, did Lana make a profit on the sale of these two lots?

(1) Lana sold lot A for 20% more than its purchase price.
(2) Lana sold lot B for more than 90% of its purchase price.


Suppose the selling price of A was x. Then the selling price of B was 2x and the question can be rephrased as follows: Is the sum of the purchase prices of A and B less than 3x?

Neither is sufficient by itself: (1) says the purchase price of A is 5x/6, (2) says that the purchase price of B is less than 20x/9.
Together, (1) and (2) tell us that the sum of the purchase prices is less than 5x/6 + 20x/9 = 15x/18 + 40x/18 =55x/18 > 3x.
Thus Lana may or may not have made a profit.

OA=E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Aug 2007, 08:55
I should go back to basic reading lessons :oops:

I completely missed 'for more than' in the second sentence.
  [#permalink] 02 Aug 2007, 08:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them marcodonzelli 2 10 Mar 2008, 22:24
Lana bought 2 stocks last year and sold both of them marcodonzelli 2 29 Dec 2007, 09:39
Bobby bought two shares of stock which he sold for $96 each. jenniferia2002 1 25 Nov 2007, 19:56
Bobby bought two shares of stock, which he sold for $96 LM 1 17 Jun 2007, 18:55
Bobby bought two shares of stock, which he sold for $96 coffeeloverfreak 3 22 Sep 2005, 20:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Lana bought two lots last year and sold both of them

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.