Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 Oct 2016, 01:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Posts: 219
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 08:16
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality Circles program for machine operators. Independent surveys of employee attitudes indicated that the machine operators participating in the program were less satisfied with their work situations after two ears of the program's existence than they were at the program's start. Obviously, any workers who participate in a Quality Circles program will as a result become less satisfied with their jobs.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the conclusion drawn above EXCEPT:

a) The second survey occured during a period of recession when rumors of cutbacks and layoffs at Lark Manufacturing were plentiful.
B) The survyes also showed that those LArk machine operators who neither participated in Quality Circles nor knew anyone who did so reported the same degree of lessened satisfaction with their work situations as did the Lark machine operators who participated in Quality Circles.
C) While participating in Quality Circles at Lark Manufactoring, machine operators exhibited two of the primary indicators of imprioved job satisfaction:increased productivity and decresed absenteeism.
D) Several workers at LArk Manufactoring who had participated in Quality Circles while employed at otehr companies reported that while participating in Quality Cirlces in their previous companies, their work satisfaction had increased.
E) The machine operators who participated in Quality Circles reported that when the program started, they felt that participation might improve their work situation.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 242
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: manufacturing company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 08:28
IMO E.

Last edited by ssandeepan on 10 Aug 2008, 20:26, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 449
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: manufacturing company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 10:22
IMO E)
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 62
Location: Houston TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 2

Re: CR: manufacturing company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 16:24
My ans is C.

a) The second survey occured during a period of recession when rumors of cutbacks and layoffs at Lark Manufacturing were plentiful. => presents other cause, so A weakens the argument
B) The survyes also showed that those LArk machine operators who neither participated in Quality Circles nor knew anyone who did so reported the same degree of lessened satisfaction with their work situations as did the Lark machine operators who participated in Quality Circles. =>not only did workers who participated in the program complain, but workers who didn't participate also complain. So, the program itself does not cause job dissatisfaction. It must be sth else. This weakens the argument.
C) While participating in Quality Circles at Lark Manufactoring, machine operators exhibited two of the primary indicators of imprioved job satisfaction:increased productivity and decresed absenteeism. => does not weaken the argument
D) Several workers at LArk Manufactoring who had participated in Quality Circles while employed at otehr companies reported that while participating in Quality Cirlces in their previous companies, their work satisfaction had increased. => their expectation is higher. It weakens the argumentE) The machine operators who participated in Quality Circles reported that when the program started, they felt that participation might improve their work situation. =>same as D, the workers had high expectation at the beginning. Weakens
_________________

haveaniceday

VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1397
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: manufacturing company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2008, 00:36
puma wrote:
lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality Circles program for machine operators. Independent surveys of employee attitudes indicated that the machine operators participating in the program were less satisfied with their work situations after two ears of the program's existence than they were at the program's start. Obviously, any workers who participate in a Quality Circles program will as a result become less satisfied with their jobs.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the conclusion drawn above EXCEPT:

a) The second survey occured during a period of recession when rumors of cutbacks and layoffs at Lark Manufacturing were plentiful.-> this might be the reason for dissatisfaction amomng employeesweakens
B) The survyes also showed that those LArk machine operators who neither participated in Quality Circles nor knew anyone who did so reported the same degree of lessened satisfaction with their work situations as did the Lark machine operators who participated in Quality Circles.-> this program cannot be blamed as rason for dissatis among employees since those who didnt attend also had dissatisfactionweakens
C) While participating in Quality Circles at Lark Manufactoring, machine operators exhibited two of the primary indicators of imprioved job satisfaction:increased productivity and decresed absenteeism. -> this opp to hats mentioned in the argument
D) Several workers at LArk Manufactoring who had participated in Quality Circles while employed at otehr companies reported that while participating in Quality Cirlces in their previous companies, their work satisfaction had increased. -> the program had better effects in other compamnies hence weakens
E) The machine operators who participated in Quality Circles reported that when the program started, they felt that participation might improve their work situation. -> this reflects that the program is reason for dissatis. since trhe employees say that initially they felt this MIGHT improve their work situation.STRENGTHENS

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Posts: 219
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: manufacturing company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2008, 10:12
OA is E.

thanks for the explanation
Re: CR: manufacturing company   [#permalink] 13 Aug 2008, 10:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality 7 21 Nov 2007, 16:19
Lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality 13 19 Jul 2007, 13:56
Lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality 8 05 Apr 2007, 11:29
Lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality 3 15 Dec 2006, 12:48
Lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality 10 30 Oct 2006, 05:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.