Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Aug 2014, 17:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Tuck Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 69

GMAT Tests User
Re: Sentence Correction Question - how to approach this one [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2010, 12:49
gurpreetsingh wrote:
IMO E

a and b not possible....wrongly used verb
between d n e....d not possible, is should be used instead of are

i m not sure about c but it lacks parallelism,

m quite weak in SC, so guys pls throw some input.


We have subject/verb agreement error (A), (C) and (D). Subject of the clause is "their compliance" - so verb should be in singular form; "protect" and "are protecting" are wrong

It leaves us with (B) and (E). Here the major problem is to choose the correct idiom: whether "laws requiring . . " or "laws to require . . ".

I consider "laws requiring" idiomatic and hence prefer (B).
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 71
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Re: Sentence Correction Question - how to approach this one [#permalink] New post 17 Feb 2010, 13:04
That is correct. singular noun compliance would need singlular verb protecting and not protect which eliminates
A and C

In D it says are protecting which again becomes plural and does not match with singular noun compliance

that leaves us with B and E

E means as if laws are reqd to for the devices and not for protecting turtle so the choice B
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Schools: DukeTuck,Kelogg,Darden
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 39 [1] , given: 28

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 28 Apr 2010, 15:12
1
This post received
KUDOS
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
_________________

Run towards the things that make you uncomfortable daily. The greatest risk is not taking risks
http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-690-to-730-q50-v38-97356.html

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1563
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 202 [1] , given: 6

Re: OG 12 SC Q133 [#permalink] New post 29 Apr 2010, 11:58
1
This post received
KUDOS
I also picked (C)...:(

the question that I have is whether it is "compliance with laws that is protecting sea turtles" or it is "laws protecting sea turtles"

Because if it is compliance with laws that is protecting sea turtles than the OA has to be (B).

Last week local shrimpers held......., saying that.....requiring......protecting - parallel

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

I would like to get some expert opinion on this.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 196
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 29

GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 12 SC Q133 [#permalink] New post 03 May 2010, 11:24
i also picked C initially but maybe its B due to the parallelism of "saying" "requiring" "protecting". Another way I look at it is that it is less wordy and less awkward than using 2 "that"s in the sentence...

can anyone else add here?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: OG 12 SC Q133 [#permalink] New post 04 May 2010, 04:09
I think C is incorrect because the sentence uses a plural verb 'protect' with a singular subject ' compliance'.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 70
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 5

Re: turtle-excluder devices [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2010, 05:20
Originally chosen C overlooking the subject-verb agreement.
B should be the answer.
_________________

+1 kudos me if this is of any help...

2 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1563
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 202 [2] , given: 6

Re: turtle-excluder devices [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2010, 07:32
2
This post received
KUDOS
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect - 'protect' is wrong. 'compliance' protects or is protecting
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting - saying, requiring, protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect - 'protect' is wrong. 'compliance' protects or is protecting
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting - 'compliance' is singular. Hence we need 'is protecting'...'are' is incorrect. 'to require' is incorrect here.
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting - 'to require' is incorrect here.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 226
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 16

GMAT Tests User
Re: turtle-excluder devices [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2010, 10:02
bigoyal wrote:
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting



subject is compliance -> singular -> eliminate A,C,D
choice is between requiring (B) or to require (D).
B is the right one as "compliance with laws to require ...." creates a run on the sentece....
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Waiting to hear from University of Texas at Austin
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 76
Location: Changchun, China
Schools: University of Texas at Austin, Michigan State
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 4

Re: turtle-excluder devices [#permalink] New post 20 Jul 2010, 17:55
Many good comments above, but I don't think anyone pointed out that laws

"to require"

would be laws that are not yet implemented. So you can not be in compliance with laws that are not laws.

this eliminates D & E

Quote:
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC GMATPrep 1 Shrimp [#permalink] New post 02 Aug 2010, 04:27
But the idiom is either:
i) laws requiring X to Y
or
ii) laws requiring that X Y

I dont see how B matches this idiom
Could anybody clarify?
thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1563
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 6

Re: SC GMATPrep 1 Shrimp [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2010, 12:26
Last week local shrimpers held a conference..........saying that their compliance..............is protecting sea turtles.

that leaves B and E.

(E) "compliance with laws to require...........is protecting" --> is awkward

(B) "compliance with laws requiring...........is protecting" --> correct

B it is.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 267
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 11

GMAT Tests User
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2011, 05:03
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to
take some credit for the resurgence of the rare
Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with
laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on
shrimp nets protect
adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on
shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp
nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
is protecting

Can someone explain this sc better
_________________

Verbal:new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ajit

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 190
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: Last week local shrimpers...tough one [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2011, 08:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
B. 'compliance' needs singular verb; 'laws to require' is unidiomatic
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 264
Schools: UC Berkley, UCLA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 66

Re: Last week local shrimpers...tough one [#permalink] New post 26 Jan 2011, 13:06
ajit257 wrote:
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to
take some credit for the resurgence of the rare
Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with
laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on
shrimp nets protect
adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on
shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp
nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
is protecting

Can someone explain this sc better


D and E are wrong because to is being used to convey purpose instead of being used to describe laws. So they're out.

Although, that require is used appropriately in C the idea that the shrimps are protected and continue tobe protected is not expressed in that answer choice. So C is out.

In A, requiring is properly used but what is expressed in that sentence is that the turtles are generally protected not that the turtle excluder is an effective device.

In B, requiring is appropriately used and the construction "devices on shrimp nets is protecting" clearly conveys that the device has been protecting and continues to protect the adult sea turtles. B is correct. IMO
_________________

Thank you for your kudoses Everyone!!!


"It always seems impossible until its done."
-Nelson Mandela

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2010
Posts: 40
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 4

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2011, 14:10
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit or the resurgence o the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
(a)
(b) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
(c) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
(d) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(e) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2011
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Last week local shrimpers...tough one [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2011, 07:21
Hello, this is my first attempt to participate in the disucssions of GMAT Club

As for the answers:

As far as I remember, in case one speaks about legal matters (like "laws" or "bills") and we need to specify further their contents, one should use --ing form for this explanation. Therefore, I immediately eliminated variants E,D, and C. In variant B: wrong subject-verb agreement (comliance protect). Thus, A (with correct S-V agreement) is correct
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 7

Re: Last week local shrimpers...tough one [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2011, 11:40
IMO B.

their Compliance {with laws ....} is protecting .... The noun, compliance, is singular.

Also requiring is correctly used here.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [1] , given: 0

Re: Last week local shrimpers...tough one [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2011, 19:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
ajit257 wrote:
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to
take some credit for the resurgence of the rare
Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with
laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on
shrimp nets protect
adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on
shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp
nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
is protecting

Can someone explain this sc better


"Laws to requiere" is unidiomatic, eliminate (D) and (E)

The noun phrase "their compliace" is the acting subject of the verb "to protect", therefore there must be a subject-verb agreement between them.

(A) Their compliance... protect // Their compliance is singular, protect is in the plural form, eliminate (A)
(B) Their compliance... is protecting // Both subject and verb are in singular form, (B) is the correct choice
(C) Their compliance... protect // Their compliance is singular, protect is in the plural form, eliminate (C)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 178
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 8

GMAT Tests User
Re: Last week local shrimpers...tough one [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 23:16
garimavyas wrote:
ajit257 wrote:
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to
take some credit for the resurgence of the rare
Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with
laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on
shrimp nets protect
adult sea turtles.

(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on
shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
is protecting

(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp
nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets
is protecting

Can someone explain this sc better

From my notes Hope it will be helpful.
Be sure to use ing form immediately after a legal noun used in objective case
Legal noun are law , ban , order, decree, contract , bill, Deed etc.
example :
GMAT enacted a ban prohibiting takers from posting live questions.

Ban is the object
However, if the legal noun is used as subject of the clause then it might be appropriate to use subjunctive form
The law requires that he perform well in GMAT.
Law is the subject
Let us consider the above problem
Laws is objective case and hence requires Ing form
Re: Last week local shrimpers...tough one   [#permalink] 22 Mar 2011, 23:16
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take souvik101990 0 09 Oct 2012, 23:46
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take daryayurlova 0 27 Jan 2011, 14:29
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take ajit257 0 22 Mar 2011, 23:16
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take Silvers 0 04 May 2010, 04:09
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take bigoyal 0 30 Sep 2011, 07:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 77 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.