Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 09:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1097
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 67

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2012, 15:03
can we not eliminate a few of the options on the basis of S- V error apart from taking "Compliance" into consideration.
saying that their compliance with laws requiring that.......
That marks the presence of a dependent clause it must have a verb but clearly first that has got no verb in it and hence can be considered wrong.
Similar manner we can eliminate C.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 78
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Schools: IE '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: -15 [0], given: 0

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2013, 16:29
B is correct.
Laws requiring is correct and compliance .... is protecting is correct
Laws to require is unidiomatic
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 454
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 39

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2013, 06:09
what is difference among

law requiring
law to requie
law for requiring

pls, help
Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 1742
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 689

Kudos [?]: 3029 [0], given: 890

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2013, 08:49
Expert's post
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2012
Posts: 44
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15, NUS '16
GMAT Date: 08-27-2013
GPA: 3.46
WE: Project Management (Other)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 54

Reviews Badge
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 02:21
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws[/u] requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.[/u]

Here in this SC we have three clauses.Every clause must have a subject and working verb.
clauses

1.Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying - non underlined part.

2. that their compliance with laws requiring - here some part is correct some part is wrong.The error in this clause is that SV agreement.In this clause subject is "compliance" a singular subject ( "laws" is not a subject because it is preceded by a preposition).Singular subject requires a singular working verb which is absent in the clause.

3. that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles - underlined portion of SC.Here subject is "turtles- excluder devices" is plural subject requires plural verb.Here the verb is "protect" is plural.So the SV agreement is correct.


POE of choices.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect-- if we chose this option the second clause goes wrong with SV agreement.Incorrect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting-- here 2 and 3 clauses are clubbed forming a single clause.In this clause subject is "compliance" the verb "is" singular.SO correct
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect--same error as A.Incorrect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting--here 2 and 3 clauses are clubbed forming a single clause.In this clause subject is "compliance" which is singular and but the verb "are" plural.So Incorrect]
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting-- Here 2 and 3 clauses are clubbed but clause lacks working verb."protecting " is a gerund. Incorrect


Note- If my explanation is wrong please correct me.Feedback is always appreciated.
_________________

.........................................................................................
Please give me kudos if my posts help.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2012
Posts: 44
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15, NUS '16
GMAT Date: 08-27-2013
GPA: 3.46
WE: Project Management (Other)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 54

Reviews Badge
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 02:51
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws[/u] requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.[/u]

Here in this SC we have three clauses.Every clause must have a subject and working verb.
clauses

1.Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying - non underlined part.

2. that their compliance with laws requiring - here some part is correct some part is wrong.The error in this clause is that SV agreement.In this clause subject is "compliance" a singular subject ( "laws" is not a subject because it is preceded by a preposition).Singular subject requires a singular working verb which is absent in the clause.

3. that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles - underlined portion of SC.Here subject is "turtles- excluder devices" is plural subject requires plural verb.Here the verb is "protect" is plural.So the SV agreement is correct.


POE of choices.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect-- if we chose this option the second clause goes wrong with SV agreement.Incorrect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting-- here 2 and 3 clauses are clubbed forming a single clause.In this clause subject is "compliance" the verb "is" singular.SO correct
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect--same error as A.Incorrect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting--here 2 and 3 clauses are clubbed forming a single clause.In this clause subject is "compliance" which is singular and but the verb "are" plural.So Incorrect]
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting-- Here 2 and 3 clauses are clubbed but clause lacks working verb."protecting " is a gerund. Incorrect


Note- If my explanation is wrong please correct me.Feedback is always appreciated.
_________________

.........................................................................................
Please give me kudos if my posts help.

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1697 [2] , given: 249

Premium Member
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 03:12
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
IMO, this is an ‘open and shut’ case involving S-V matching . Limiting just to the underline part, we may see that the subject of the subordinate clause introduced by ‘ that ‘ is compliance, a simple singular noun and therefore its verb should be matching with yet again a singular . You have the singular specification only in B and E; In E, ‘laws to require’ is unidiomatic while ‘laws requiring’ is the custom usage. So E. any hitch?
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1697 [0], given: 249

Premium Member
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 03:37
Expert's post
IMO, this is an ‘open and shut’ case involving S-V matching . Limiting just to the underline part, we may see that the subject of the subordinate clause introduced by ‘ that ‘ is compliance, a simple singular noun and therefore its verb should be matching with yet again a singular . You have the singular specification only in B and E; In E, ‘laws to require’ is unidiomatic while ‘laws requiring’ is the custom usage. So E. any hitch?
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 4

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 04:56
Hi Daagh,

Totally agree with you on S/V - leaving us with B or E.

However I would say that 'laws requiring' is the correct phrase. I can't say I have any idiom table that refutes your point, but it just sounds awful to my eat the other way, and it's not an idiom I've come accross
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 267

Kudos [?]: 1697 [0], given: 249

Premium Member
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 05:00
Expert's post
sorry plumber250 ; I meant to write E is out and B is eventually ; Yes E is terrible . That is what I have said in the explanation before my final sentence,; it ia typo
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 4

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 05:07
You absolutely do. Sorry - I did not read your post properly.

Apologies all around!
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 70

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 05:11
All duplicate threads on this topic have been merged.

Please read and follow the Guidelines for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum before posting anything.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2012
Posts: 117
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 57

Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 04 May 2013, 18:53
My 2 cents :P

compliance is usually used as - My compliance with the state law ensures that no harm is done. ( Singular format )

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

A,C are out because of the singular use of compliance.
"laws to require" is unidiomatic. "laws that require" is more meaningful. This eliminates D and E

B seems to be a good choice although it has -ing usage in 3 places.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2012
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 223

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2013, 09:59
daagh wrote:
IMO, this is an ‘open and shut’ case involving S-V matching . Limiting just to the underline part, we may see that the subject of the subordinate clause introduced by ‘ that ‘ is compliance, a simple singular noun and therefore its verb should be matching with yet again a singular . You have the singular specification only in B and E; In E, ‘laws to require’ is unidiomatic while ‘laws requiring’ is the custom usage. So E. any hitch?



cant the plural pronoun 'their' be used as the subject of the 2nd clause, making me select option D. im confused here.
Current Student
avatar
Status: Prep Mode
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 69

Reviews Badge
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2013, 10:34
saggii27 wrote:
daagh wrote:
IMO, this is an ‘open and shut’ case involving S-V matching . Limiting just to the underline part, we may see that the subject of the subordinate clause introduced by ‘ that ‘ is compliance, a simple singular noun and therefore its verb should be matching with yet again a singular . You have the singular specification only in B and E; In E, ‘laws to require’ is unidiomatic while ‘laws requiring’ is the custom usage. So E. any hitch?



cant the plural pronoun 'their' be used as the subject of the 2nd clause, making me select option D. im confused here.


Whenever in doubt regarding the subject of the clause, figure out the verb and then check who is modifying this verb.

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

B: requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
D: to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting

So, the Verb Tense is Present Continuous "is protecting" or "are protecting" ? Now, ask this question to yourself, who is actually the doer of the action i.e. what is protecting adult sea turtles.

Is it Their(shrimpers) or the Compliance (with laws) ???

It has to be the compliance which is protecting adult sea turtles.Thus, the subject of the clause is compliance and not their. Hope it helps.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Posts: 81
Location: United States (CA)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2013, 12:35
B for me.

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting


just scan the answer choices.

A. requiring....protect --> wrong ||sms
B. requiring..protecting..keep ---> "saying that their compliance with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices" is concise.
C. require...protect...keep ---> "saying that their compliance with laws that require turtle-excluder devices" is too wordy
D. require...protecting --> wrong ||sms
E. requite..protecting --> wrong ||sms
_________________

Please Help with Kudos, if you like my post.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 249
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2014, 10:27
nevergiveup wrote:
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

Please explain your answers. Thanks.


I got this one wrong because I was too quick, here's the breakdown though:

A) we need s-v agreement: compliance is our subject, so we need a singular verb. Protect is plural, A is gone
B) "Is" is a correct verb to use with compliance, so B is correct.
C) protect is incorrect. C is gone
D) are is incorrect, D is gone
E) the infinitive form "to require" is wrong and awkward. The present participle requiring implies we have a present requirement, which is the intended meaning of the author.

Therefore, B is correct
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 123
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 44

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2014, 14:19
x2suresh wrote:
eileen1017 wrote:
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

Please explain your answers. Thanks.



try to find the main subject and verb here..

Main subject : compliance

complicance... protect adult sea turtles
Sub- Verb Problem

A,C -- > are out.

complicance...are protecting adult sea turtles
D -->out

between B and E

"laws to require" is not idiomatic

B is better.


Subject + Verb should make sense.
So Compliance (Subject) ....is protecting (verb) does not really make sense here.
Re: Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take   [#permalink] 30 Sep 2014, 14:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take daryayurlova 0 27 Jan 2011, 14:29
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take ajit257 0 22 Mar 2011, 23:16
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take Silvers 0 04 May 2010, 04:09
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take zest4mba 0 17 Feb 2010, 13:04
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take bigoyal 0 30 Sep 2011, 07:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   [ 78 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.