Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the [#permalink]
20 Aug 2006, 06:05
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low.
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.
We need something to break the trend that the author bases his conclusion upon. B does this very well by saying that, dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent. In other words it says that if the dip wasn't there the inflation would have been at a stable point, that of 4%. This statement opens up the possibilities of the inflation for next year to be 4% constant, or drop or rise. Thus, there is no certainty. Hence, B weakens the argument.
I think D in one way, may support the argument.
However, i feel it does not strengthen it or weaken it.