Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 26 Aug 2016, 19:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Laws requiring the use of headlights during daylight hours

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 352
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 75 [2] , given: 1

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 06:01
2
KUDOS
16
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (02:45) correct 32% (02:04) wrong based on 1601 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 43
Page: 133
Difficulty:

Laws requiring the use of headlights during daylight hours can prevent automobile collisions. However, since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator, any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries. In fact, the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.

Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?

(A) Drivers in the continental United States who used their headlights during the day would be just as likely to become involved in a collision as would drivers who did not use their headlights.

(B) In many countries that are farther from the equator than is the continental United States, poor daylight visibility is the single most important factor in automobile collisions.

(C) The proportion of automobile collisions that occur in the daytime is greater in the continental United States than in the countries that have daytime headlight laws.

(D) Fewer automobile collisions probably occur each year in countries that have daytime headlight laws than occur within the continental United States.

(E) Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws.

Thanks,
Darth
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Narenn on 07 Oct 2013, 10:44, edited 4 times in total.
Necessary Corrections for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 06:23
C.

Headlight laws can prevent automobile conclusions. It is more effective in countries that have poor day light. So, of the total automobile collisions that happen in those coutries, the daytime collisions are lesser than in the US.

GA
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 12:35
Choose E.

this law works better in the countries where visibility is poor. countries that are farther from equator have poor visibility thant continental USA.
Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 673
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 14:19
Would go with A...

Since continental US is close to the equator, the law requiring drivers to turn on the headlights wouldnt make any difference 'cos of the availability of sunlight(since it is close to equator)
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 115 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 15:29
E can be more properly drawn from the statements than A, according to me.
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 484
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 16:16
IMO E is the only choice, everything else is either out of scope or far fetched.
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 725
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 47 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 17:04
2
KUDOS
(E) Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws.

- this is good. The argument clearly says that USA, the daytime visibility is good and laws will not help that much, but countries that have such laws already in place are away from the equator, so they have more chance of getting involved in an accident without the law.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 17:19
one more E
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 282
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 21:50
E for me
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 282
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2005, 21:51
E for me
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 352
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2005, 07:37

It is interesting to see... the answers gravitating towards E. Thank you very much for participating.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Location: TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2006, 18:30
Time yourself 2 mins

Laws requiring the use of headlights during daylight hours can prevent automobile collisions. However, since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator, any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries. In fact, the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.

Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?

(A) Drivers in the continental United States who used their headlights during the day would be just as likely to become involved in a collision as would drivers who did not use their headlights.

(B) In many countries that are farther from the equator than is the continental United States, poor daylight visibility is the single most important factor in automobile collisions.

(C) The proportion of automobile collisions that occur in the daytime is greater in the continental United States than in the countries that have daytime headlight laws.

(D) Fewer automobile collisions probably occur each year in countries that have daytime headlight laws than occur within the continental United States.

(E) Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws.
VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2006, 20:09
E for m2.
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1890
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 255 [2] , given: 0

Re: CR - automobile collisions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2006, 20:33
2
KUDOS
Laws requiring the use of headlights during daylight hours can prevent automobile collisions. However, since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator, any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries. In fact, the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.

Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?

(A) Drivers in the continental United States who used their headlights during the day would be just as likely to become involved in a collision as would drivers who did not use their headlights.
---> it doesn't sum up all the premises ---> can't be a conclusion.

(B) In many countries that are farther from the equator than is the continental United States, poor daylight visibility is the single most important factor in automobile collisions.
---> no point in the passage indicates this ---> out.

(C) The proportion of automobile collisions that occur in the daytime is greater in the continental United States than in the countries that have daytime headlight laws.
-----> US is better than farther countries in term of being closer to the equator; however, US is worse than farther countries in term of not having such laws -----> positive side + negative side ----> the result is not necessarily negative ----> C is not applausible ---> out.

(D) Fewer automobile collisions probably occur each year in countries that have daytime headlight laws than occur within the continental United States.
----> Same to C

(E) Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws.

-----> Yeah, the reason why US doesn't have such laws is probably because such laws do less to prevent automobile collisions in US than they do in farther countries. ----> applausible. Note that the use of "would probably" makes E least vulnerable to criticism!

Go for E.
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 528
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2006, 21:06
Straight E.
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1025
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2006, 00:54
B is a sweeping conclusion. We need more information to come to that conclusion.

this statement makes it clear. "any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries"

more effective because, there is more chance of collisions
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 213
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2006, 12:42
E it is.
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2006, 12:54
E in 2 mins 5 secs...
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Location: TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2006, 18:46
OA is E
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5239
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2006, 08:27
Raising the minimum driving age to 18, or even 21, would probably be the most effective way to reduce the number of annual auto accidents in the continental US. This one is a clear (E). <--- I meant E!

* The disclaimer here is continental. Otherwise we would have to consider Alaska, which is dark 24 hours a day three months out of the year.

Last edited by GMATT73 on 07 Oct 2006, 02:01, edited 1 time in total.

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 36 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 In a jurisdiction where the use of headlights 1 11 Oct 2014, 10:51
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and 2 24 Jul 2008, 10:00
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and 11 14 Jul 2008, 18:49
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and 7 10 Mar 2008, 02:18
Time yourself 2 mins Laws requiring the use of headlights 0 01 Oct 2013, 11:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by