Leaders of a miners’ union on strike against Coalco are cont : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 17:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Leaders of a miners’ union on strike against Coalco are cont

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 2

Leaders of a miners’ union on strike against Coalco are cont [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2009, 22:18
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (02:23) correct 20% (01:20) wrong based on 769 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 42
Page: 132
Difficulty:

Leaders of a miners’ union on strike against Coalco are contemplating additional measures to pressure the company to accept the union's contract proposal．The union leaders are considering as their principal new tactic a consumer boycott against Gasco gas stations，which are owned by Energy Incorporated，the same corporation that owns Coalco.

The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to the union leaders’ consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal?

(A) Would revenue losses by Gasco seriously affect Energy Incorporated?
(B) Can current Gasco customers easily obtain gasoline elsewhere?
(C) Have other miners’unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union?
(D) Have other unions that have employed a similar tactic achieved their goals with it?
(E) Do other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations?

[Reveal] Spoiler:

Any other Option other than C and E are related in some way or the other to the leader's consideration that "attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal"

Regarding Option C:
Whether or not other minor's union have won such proposals - is not related to the fact that something will happen by boycotting the Gasco...and therefore this is the answer

Regarding Option E:
If there are other Co that own both of them, on boycotting Gasco of Energy Incorporated - consumers will go to other Gasco, who also own CoalCo. Therefore the competitors of Energy Incorporated will start performing better and therefore a cause of concern for Energy Incorporated, and likely hood that they will accept the proposal is more.

Therefore Option E is to some extent related and not the correct answer.

If so then "C" is a better anwer. But all forums show option "C" as the correct answer. With a reason that

"If other miners’ unions have won similar contracts，then the union's proposal is reasonable．This question is relevant．"

this is not all related to the union Leaders plans that "attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal". So what if the proposal is reasonable, but it will not get accepted because of boycott...am i wrong...?

Can someone help in understanding what - understanding should we carry about GMAT choice of answers.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

- Its all about correctness first and then the timing.

Last edited by Narenn on 07 Oct 2013, 09:44, edited 3 times in total.
Necessary Corrections for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4246
Followers: 331

Kudos [?]: 3477 [1] , given: 101

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2009, 22:50
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
41．Leaders of a miners’ union on strike against Coalco are contemplating additional measures to pressure the company to accept the union's contract proposal．The union leaders are considering as their principal new tactic a consumer boycott against Gasco gas stations，which are owned by Energy Incorporated，the same corporation that owns Coalco。

The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to the union leaders’ consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal?

](A) Would revenue losses by Gasco seriously affect Energy Incorporated?
(B) Can current Gasco customers easily obtain gasoline elsewhere?
(C) Have other miners’unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union?
(D) Have other unions that have employed a similar tactic achieved their goals with it?
(E) Do other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations?

41) i think u r right that both choices are very close and if one does not look clearly might fall for any ans.....
however one point which asks for merit is:-
relevance asked is for union leaders’ consideration of the proposal and not relevance of proposal.... slight difference but i think an imp one...
since union leaders’ consideration would encompass points which might not be true for relevance of proposal..
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 2

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2009, 00:51
1
KUDOS
All I could carry as an understanding for myself is that

"We should not apply two-step logical co-relation. It should be as much as possible single step co-relation."

Does anyone have an example where the above conclusion is flawed ??
_________________

- Its all about correctness first and then the timing.

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 330
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2009, 01:46
I must say C is not also that relevant as it doesn't mean whether other miners’ unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union guarantee to win this contract by the same union still if you think this kind of previous case study can provide some information about the success of the plan. At least if other miners’ unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union , the fact could have add confidence to the union leaders.
But E is no way relevant.
So between C & E, I'll always go for E.
And one humble request please don't write the closed options in heading as it will simply tell us to look between two out of five!
Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 76
Location: chennai
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 37 [3] , given: 0

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2010, 19:03
3
KUDOS
41．Leaders of a miners’ union on strike against Coalco are contemplating additional measures to pressure the company to accept the union's contract proposal．The union leaders are considering as their principal new tactic a consumer boycott against Gasco gas stations，which are owned by Energy Incorporated，the same corporation that owns Coalco。

/////////// Energy incorp//////////
Gasco station -------------- Coalco Corp
BI -Union Strike against Coalco Corp to accept the contract's proposal.
Tactise - Boycotting on Gasco station affect the Coalco Corp

We need to find the least one.

The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to the union leaders’ consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal?

(A) Would revenue losses by Gasco seriously affect Energy Incorporated? if yes - Boycotting Gasco affect the Coalco's Corp.
(B) Can current Gasco customers easily obtain gasoline elsewhere? - if yes - Boycotting Gasco affect the Coalco's Corp.
(C) Have other miners’unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union? - if yes - Boycotting Gasco may or maynot the Coalco's Corp.
(D) Have other unions that have employed a similar tactic achieved their goals with it? - if yes - Boycotting Gasco affect the Coalco's Corp.
(E) Do other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations? - If yes/No we can't say anything about Boycotting Gasco affect the Coalco's Corp.

Ans E)
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 441
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 112

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 20:45
e .. relatively simple !!
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 333
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 7

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2010, 00:23
yes E it should be - direct shot!
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 11

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2010, 07:51
E it is.

C is relevant. If companies have won similar contract then you have case to follow, if companies have never won such contract then may be you have no hope at all.

E is not relevant. Fact is Gasco is owned by Energy, whether there are similar corporation like that in the world, it doesn't matter, you want to strike Gaso, not IBM, HP, Dell.... Your concern is Gasco only.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 197
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 15

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2010, 16:00
correct, E has nothing to do with the question of success of the leaders’ attemt. C, if positive provides support for their position.
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 579 [0], given: 6

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 10:33
E is totally irrelevant to the argument in hand.
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 749 [0], given: 36

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 20:51
negate E and nothing happens to the argument We are least bothered about "other corporations"
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Location: india
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 10

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 01:16
"We should not apply two-step logical co-relation. It should be as much as possible single step co-relation."
Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 471
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 24

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 02:34
IMO E...coz other gas companies owning mines is irrelevant and since the question says LEAST its got to be E
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 44
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 8

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2010, 12:17
E it is!!!
Manager
Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Posts: 239
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 17

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2010, 12:44
pual wrote:
Question from OG11-Verbal Review

41．Leaders of a miners’ union on strike against Coalco are contemplating additional measures to pressure the company to accept the union's contract proposal．The union leaders are considering as their principal new tactic a consumer boycott against Gasco gas stations，which are owned by Energy Incorporated，the same corporation that owns Coalco

The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to the union leaders’ consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal?

(A) Would revenue losses by Gasco seriously affect Energy Incorporated?
(B) Can current Gasco customers easily obtain gasoline elsewhere?
(C) Have other miners’unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union? This is relevant because I need to know if my contract is way over the top and unreasonable
(D) Have other unions that have employed a similar tactic achieved their goals with it?
(E) Do other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations?How does it really matter if other corporations that own coal companies own gas stations? It does not give my any significant information regarding the strike

Any other Option other than C and E are related in some way or the other to the leader's consideration that "attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal"

Regarding Option C:
Whether or not other minor's union have won such proposals - is not related to the fact that something will happen by boycotting the Gasco...and therefore this is the answer

Regarding Option E:
If there are other Co that own both of them, on boycotting Gasco of Energy Incorporated - consumers will go to other Gasco, who also own CoalCo. Therefore the competitors of Energy Incorporated will start performing better and therefore a cause of concern for Energy Incorporated, and likely hood that they will accept the proposal is more.

Therefore Option E is to some extent related and not the correct answer.

If so then "C" is a better anwer. But all forums show option "C" as the correct answer. With a reason that

"If other miners’ unions have won similar contracts，then the union's proposal is reasonable．This question is relevant．"

this is not all related to the union Leaders plans that "attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal". So what if the proposal is reasonable, but it will not get accepted because of boycott...am i wrong...?

Can someone help in understanding what - understanding should we carry about GMAT choice of answers.
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 186
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 11

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2010, 19:52
I am also with E.
It doesn't matter to either the Leaders or the corporation whether there are any other corporations that own coal companies as well as gas stations.

But can anyone explain me what option C is trying to say ... I am pretty sure that E is related to the premise but want to know what exactly C is trying to say.

Thanks in advance for the explanation
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2009
Posts: 57
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2011, 00:43
geturdream wrote:
I am also with E.
It doesn't matter to either the Leaders or the corporation whether there are any other corporations that own coal companies as well as gas stations.

But can anyone explain me what option C is trying to say ... I am pretty sure that E is related to the premise but want to know what exactly C is trying to say.

Thanks in advance for the explanation

C: Have other miners' unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union?

Leaders of 1 miners’ union are trying to make the company accept the union's contract proposal, let say contract X.
C is the question whether other unions achieved contracts that are similar/the same as the contract X. HTH
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 18

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2011, 08:38
E is the best answer because I find it irrelevant at all.
_________________

Hung M.Tran
Faculty of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University of Vietnam

Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
Posts: 214
WE 1: 4 yr IT
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 26

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2011, 10:58
E straight.
_________________

this time, we play for keeps

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 649
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 51

Re: Why E and not C ??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2011, 12:04
yes, has to be E , as the answer to whether other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations is irrelevant . C offers a precedent , which is obviously relevant .
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Re: Why E and not C ???   [#permalink] 26 Jan 2011, 12:04

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 34 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 The higher the level of certain vitamins and minerals 10 22 Sep 2014, 20:45
9 The higher the level of certain vitamins and minerals in the 13 04 May 2008, 20:07
The higher the level of certain vitamins and minerals in the 8 13 Jan 2008, 08:24
Asbestos, an almost indestructible mineral once installed as 7 09 Oct 2007, 06:52
14 The higher the level of certain vitamins and minerals in the 21 17 Jul 2007, 16:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Leaders of a miners’ union on strike against Coalco are cont

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.