Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Apr 2016, 11:44
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Letter to the editor: After Baerton s factory closed, there

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 285
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Letter to the editor: After Baerton s factory closed, there [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2006, 20:42
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

Letter to the editor: After Baerton’s factory closed, there was a sharp increase in the number of claims filed for job-related injury compensation by the factory’s former employees, Hence there is reason to believe that most of those who filed for compensation after the factory closed were just out to gain benefits they did not deserve, and filed only to help them weather their job loss.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Workers cannot file for compensation for many job-related injuries, such as hearings loss from factory noise, until they have left the job.
(B) In the years before the factory closed, the factory’s managers dismissed several employees who had filed injury claims.
(C) Most workers who receive an injury on the job file for compensation on the day they suffer the injury.
(D) Workers who incur partial disabilities due to injuries on the job often do not file for compensation because they would have to stop working to receive compensation but cannot afford to live on that compensation alone.
(E) Workers who are aware that they will soon be laid off from a job often become depressed, making them more prone to job-related injuries.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1737
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2006, 23:02
Will go with C.

The author argues that the increasing number of suits for work related injuries after the factory closed is because the people are looking for a way to earn a fast buck.
We have to find a way to strengthen the argument.(Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT)
C states that workers file for work related injuries the day they are injured hence the workers filling after the factory closed must be doing for some other purpose namely financial gain.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2006, 00:59
'c' AS WELL..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 141
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2006, 02:54
yup .. C 4 me too.. only C seems to strengthen the conclusion !!
_________________

--I never think of future, it comes soon enough!!

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 945
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2006, 03:08
C does not weaken the argument
_________________

I believe its yogurt!

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jun 2006, 00:12
C it is.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jun 2006, 12:07
Yup, it's C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 285
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jun 2006, 15:09
OA is indeed C
  [#permalink] 10 Jun 2006, 15:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure aditi1903 8 10 Oct 2012, 00:16
1 Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure GetThisDone 11 05 May 2012, 22:45
1 Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the dancinggeometry 5 22 Sep 2008, 01:06
Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the bepositive 7 21 May 2008, 09:00
Letter to the editor: After Baerton s factory closed, there eyunni 4 13 Nov 2007, 09:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Letter to the editor: After Baerton s factory closed, there

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.