Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 03 Sep 2015, 20:33
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 286
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 19

Premium Member
Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 05 May 2012, 21:45
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (02:36) correct 55% (01:29) wrong based on 462 sessions
Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure on this year’s ballot, would
prohibit the ownership of handguns within the city’s limits. Under the plan, gun owners
would have a 90-day grace period to turn in their weapons to authorities. Proponents of the
proposition argue that fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime,
making the city safer for all of its citizens.
Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the
opposite effect. Since only law abiding citizens would honor the ban, armed criminals
would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with
impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself.
In the letter to the editor, the
two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A) The first is an observation that the author uses to support a particular position; the second is
that position.
b) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the author believes to be true; the second offers
evidence to contradict this pattern.
c) The first is a position that the author argues will not hold in this case; the second is the
author’s position.
d) The first is a prediction that the author believes to be untrue. The second is a statement of
fact that undermines the author’s position.
e) The first is a direct relationship that the author believes will not hold in this case; the second
offers evidence in support of the author’s position.

Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2013
Posts: 44
GMAT Date: 03-20-2014
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 41 [1] , given: 56

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2014, 09:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
Kindly provide explanation to this CR question. I chose C.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2011
Posts: 120
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 64 [1] , given: 7

Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2014, 23:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
GetThisDone wrote:
Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure on this year’s ballot, would
prohibit the ownership of handguns within the city’s limits. Under the plan, gun owners
would have a 90-day grace period to turn in their weapons to authorities. Proponents of the
proposition argue that fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime,
making the city safer for all of its citizens.
Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the
opposite effect. Since only law abiding citizens would honor the ban, armed criminals
would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with
impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself.
In the letter to the editor, the
two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A) The first is an observation that the author uses to support a particular position; the second is
that position.
b) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the author believes to be true; the second offers
evidence to contradict this pattern.
c) The first is a position that the author argues will not hold in this case; the second is the
author’s position.
d) The first is a prediction that the author believes to be untrue. The second is a statement of
fact that undermines the author’s position.
e) The first is a direct relationship that the author believes will not hold in this case; the second
offers evidence in support of the author’s position.

Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html


In the first boldface the proponents claim that fewer handguns on the streets will lead to less violent crime. In the second boldface the author provides evidence to refute the proponent's claim.

Thus - a,b and d are out right wrong and thus eliminated.

Left with c and e - In C second boldface is not the author's position, it is evidence to support the position. The author's position is: Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the opposite effect.

Thus, we are left with e. Hope this helps.
_________________

Paras.

If you found my post helpful give KUDOS!!! Everytime you thank me but don't give Kudos, an Angel dies!

My GMAT Debrief:

I am now providing personalized one to one GMAT coaching over Skype at a nominal fee. Hurry up to get an early bird discount! Send me an IM to know more.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Posts: 155
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 422

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2014, 01:32
Isnt the word "Evidence " in the OA wrong? I don't find any evidence there. what is the source of this question?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2011
Posts: 120
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 7

Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2014, 02:19
akankshasoneja wrote:
Isnt the word "Evidence " in the OA wrong? I don't find any evidence there. what is the source of this question?


hmmm yeah...I'd agree with your point. It is more of a claim than evidence.
_________________

Paras.

If you found my post helpful give KUDOS!!! Everytime you thank me but don't give Kudos, an Angel dies!

My GMAT Debrief:

I am now providing personalized one to one GMAT coaching over Skype at a nominal fee. Hurry up to get an early bird discount! Send me an IM to know more.

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 351
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '16, IIMA (M)
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 68

Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2014, 05:26
idinuv

Letter to the editor:

proponents of the Proposition Q- feel that fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime, making the city safer for all of its citizens.------premise/ evidence- fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime( A leads to B- Direct relationship)
---------------conclusion - city safer for all of its citizens.

author----- premise/ evidence---- armed criminals would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself....
conclusion-----city will not be safe.....


c) The first is a position that the author argues will not hold in this case; the second is the author’s position.....the first BF may be correct .. the second is not....it is not author's position but evidence......

e) The first is a direct relationship that the author believes will not hold in this case; the second offers evidence in support of the author’s position..........BF1- author believes it will not hold true......BF2- AUTHOR'S EVIDENCE.......CORRECT



KUDOS IF YOU PLEASE...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Oh GMAT ! I give you one more shot :)
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 95
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 18

Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2014, 11:44
akankshasoneja wrote:
Isnt the word "Evidence " in the OA wrong? I don't find any evidence there. what is the source of this question?


The author's claim is
Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the opposite effect.

And the evidence author provides to support his claim is the next sentence
Since only law abiding citizens would honor the ban, armed criminals would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself.
_________________

Life is a highway
I wanna ride it all night long

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 127
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 110

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 01 Feb 2014, 01:22
prasun9 wrote:
akankshasoneja wrote:
Isnt the word "Evidence " in the OA wrong? I don't find any evidence there. what is the source of this question?


The author's claim is
Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the opposite effect.

And the evidence author provides to support his claim is the next sentence
Since only law abiding citizens [b]would honor the ban, armed criminals would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself.[/b]


i do agree, second cant be an evidence. Evidence has to be an undiputable fact. The usage of 'would' in the second bold face suggest that author is not sure of the outcome and it could best be author's belief or claim.
_________________

“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 178
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 82

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 20 Jun 2014, 13:59
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-criti ... questions/

I read it here that Evidence is something that has 'happened' in objective world.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2013
Posts: 56
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 20

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2014, 03:43
GetThisDone wrote:
Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure on this year’s ballot, would
prohibit the ownership of handguns within the city’s limits. Under the plan, gun owners
would have a 90-day grace period to turn in their weapons to authorities. Proponents of the
proposition argue that fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime,
making the city safer for all of its citizens.
Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the
opposite effect. Since only law abiding citizens would honor the ban, armed criminals
would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with
impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself.
In the letter to the editor, the
two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A) The first is an observation that the author uses to support a particular position; the second is
that position.
b) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the author believes to be true; the second offers
evidence to contradict this pattern.
c) The first is a position that the author argues will not hold in this case; the second is the
author’s position.
d) The first is a prediction that the author believes to be untrue. The second is a statement of
fact that undermines the author’s position.
e) The first is a direct relationship that the author believes will not hold in this case; the second
offers evidence in support of the author’s position.

Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html



I am pretty sure, this is the author's claim not the evidence. In any case C & E were the closest ones

Is there a way questions can be checked by moderators in case there are doubts on it??
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Applied
Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 158
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 46

Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2014, 21:31
The authors claim is that the new law would not help in curbing crime and 2nd boldface is the reason why the author thinks it would not. Only option E states that hence E. hope this one helps.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 30
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 82

Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2015, 09:41
Proposition Q, a controversial measure on this year’s ballot, would
prohibit the ownership of handguns within the city’s limits. Under the plan, gun owners
would have a 90-day grace period to turn in their weapons to authorities. Proponents of the
proposition argue that fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime,
making the city safer for all of its citizens.
Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the
opposite effect. Since only law abiding citizens would honor the ban, armed criminals
would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with
impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself.


1. Evidence: "a plan to ban ownership of handguns, make gun owners to turn in their weapons to authorities".

2. Main Conclusion (author believes the ban will make the city more dangerous rather): "Unfortunately, the ban would actually have the opposite effect."
Premise: "Since only law abiding citizens would honor the ban, armed criminals
would not only keep their weapons but would also have the confidence to act with
impunity on a population that could no longer defend itself
"

3. Intermediate conclusion (proponent's position): the ban will make "the city safer for all of its citizens"
Premise: "fewer handguns on the streets would lead to less violent crime"

(A) The first is an observation that the author uses to support a particular position; the second is that position.
B2 is not the position (conclusion) - it is a premise.

(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the author believes to be true; the second makes a claim that contradicts this pattern.
The author does not believe it will come true.

(C) The first is a position that the author argues will not hold in this case; the second is the author’s position.
This one is tricky. Since the B1 unites both the intermediate conclusion (position that the author opposes) and the premise this should not be regarded as a solely a position. Let us see further.

(D) The first is a prediction that the author believes to be untrue. The second is a claim that undermines the author’s position.
B2 does the opposite - it is the premise that the author uses to support his conclusion.

(E) The first is a direct relationship that the author believes will not hold in this case; the second makes a claim in support of the author’s position.
As long as I don't like any of the above questions I choose E and I am done. However B2 is correctly named as a claim (premise) in support of the position. If I compare this description of B1 with the one in (C) I shall like (E) option because direct relationship sounds good to descrive a conlusion and a premise combined in one
Re: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure   [#permalink] 24 Aug 2015, 09:41
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Boldface Revision: Letter to the editor: Proposition Q souvik101990 7 20 Mar 2015, 22:06
2 Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure aditi1903 8 09 Oct 2012, 23:16
Letter to the editor: After Baerton s factory closed, there old_dream_1976 7 08 Jun 2006, 19:42
A letter submitted to the editor of a national newsmagazine old_dream_1976 6 07 Apr 2006, 14:16
A letter submitted to the editor of a national newsmagazine giddi77 10 24 Jan 2006, 01:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.