Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Jan 2017, 02:47

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 119
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 72 [2] , given: 0

Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Sep 2008, 00:06
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (02:30) correct 39% (01:29) wrong based on 131 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the estate tax, a levy imposed on the transfer of property of the estate of a deceased person to a living person or organization. The primary argument in favor of the estate tax is that it is a necessary component of a system of progressive taxation. Not only is this argument faulty, but the estate tax is also lousy for the economy. Primarily, the estate tax directly penalizes savings and investment, two activities that are vital to create and sustain jobs. Furthermore, the estate tax undermines a strong work ethic by devaluing the link between work and reward.

In the letter to the editor, the two sections in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a fact in support of the author’s position; the second is that position.
(B) The first is a consideration that the author argues is irrelevant; the second is a consideration in support of the author’s argument.
(C) The first is an assumption that contradicts the author’s position; the second is a premise in support of the author’s position.
(D) The first is a conclusion that stands in opposition to the author’s position; the second is the author’s position.
(E) The first is a premise that clarifies the author’s position; the second is a prediction that the author believes will hold true.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 306
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Re: Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Sep 2008, 00:13
D.
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 82
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Sep 2008, 01:06
IMO C
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 206
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Sep 2008, 03:27
dancinggeometry wrote:
Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the estate tax, a levy imposed on the transfer of property of the estate of a deceased person to a living person or organization. The primary argument in favor of the estate tax is that it is a necessary component of a system of progressive taxation. Not only is this argument faulty, but the estate tax is also lousy for the economy. Primarily, the estate tax directly penalizes savings and investment, two activities that are vital to create and sustain jobs. Furthermore, the estate tax undermines a strong work ethic by devaluing the link between work and reward.

In the letter to the editor, the two sections in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a fact in support of the author’s position; the second is that position.
(B) The first is a consideration that the author argues is irrelevant; the second is a consideration in support of the author’s argument.
(C) The first is an assumption that contradicts the author’s position; the second is a premise in support of the author’s position.
(D) The first is a conclusion that stands in opposition to the author’s position; the second is the author’s position.
(E) The first is a premise that clarifies the author’s position; the second is a prediction that the author believes will hold true.

D it is.
Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 180
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Sep 2008, 06:13
I would go with C as well.
I dont think the first one is a conclusion. it is more likely a premise.
what is the oa?
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 119
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Re: Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Sep 2008, 21:26
OA is D

The author believes that the estate tax has a detrimental effect on the economy. This opinion, which is conveyed in the second boldface portion, stands in contrast to the opinion of estate tax proponents (that it is a necessary component of a progressive taxation system).

(A) The first boldface portion is not a fact but an opinion cited by those in favor of the estate tax. The second boldface portion is, in fact, the author’s position that the estate tax is lousy for the economy.

(B) The author disagrees with the first boldface portion but does not argue that it is irrelevant. The second boldface portion is the author’s position itself, rather than a consideration in support of this position.

(C) The first boldface portion is not an assumption but a conclusion in favor of the estate tax. The second boldface portion is the author’s position itself, rather than a premise in support of this position.

(D) CORRECT. The first boldface portion is a conclusion in favor of the estate tax, a position that is in opposition to the author’s position. The second boldface portion is the author’s position that the estate tax is lousy for the economy.

(E) The first boldface portion does not clarify the author’s position; instead, it opposes the author’s position. The second boldface portion is not a prediction but the author’s conclusion concerning the estate tax.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10537
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Jul 2016, 02:47
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the   [#permalink] 17 Jul 2016, 02:47
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Letter to the editor: Our city plans to allow 4 22 Dec 2014, 09:47
2 Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure 8 09 Oct 2012, 23:16
7 Letter to the editor: Proposition Q, a controversial measure 11 05 May 2012, 21:45
Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the 7 21 May 2008, 08:00
Letter to the editor: After Baerton s factory closed, there 4 13 Nov 2007, 08:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Letter to the editor: The Senate recently voted to keep the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.