Upon request, I am providing the solution of the question above:
I will provide a graphical approach since that is what I favor always but later will give an algebraic approach too...

The two diagrams below illustrate the case where we take both statements together. In one case, reflection of a is not parallel to b and in the other reflection of a is parallel to b. Hence even with both statements we cannot say whether reflection of a is parallel to b. Answer (E).



If a and b make 45 degrees angle with the y axis (as shown, technically I will not say that they are both making 45 degrees angle with y axis but let's not worry about it here), when a is reflected along y axis, its angle with y axis is still 45. In this case a and b are parallel.

Algebraic approach:
A line is defined by 2 things - its slope and y intercept. When we reflect a line along the y axis, its slope flips sign but y intercept remains unchanged.
For more on this: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2010/12 ... he-graphs/
Now,
a -> y = mx + c
b -> y = nx + d
Reflected a -> y = -mx + c
Ques: Is -m = n? (Parallel lines have the same slope.)

Stmnt 1: mn = -1
m = -1/n.
If m = 1 and n = -1, -m is equal to n
If m = -1 and n = 1, -m is equal to n
If m = -1/2 and n = 2, -m is not equal to n
Not sufficient.

Stmnt 2: n>0
If m = -1 and n = 1, -m is equal to n
If m = -1/2 and n = 2, -m is not equal to n
Not sufficient.

Taking both together,
If m = -1 and n = 1, -m is equal to n
If m = -1/2 and n = 2, -m is not equal to n
Not sufficient. Answer (E).
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

S1 insufficient
Y axis has no reflection about y axis. Assume line a= y axis. The answer is NO

If line a has slope -1. Slop of b is 1. Reflection of line a about y axis is parallel to line b. The answer is YES

S2 insufficient.
Slope of line a is unknown

1) + 2) sufficient
Since b>0 the line b cannot be x axis. Line a cannot be y axis - a is perpendicular to b. That means when a has reflection about y axis it is parallel to b. The answer to the question is YES

Posted from my mobile device

But according to the 'bagrettin' explanation to my previous question:
a --- y = mx + b
b --- y = (-1/m)x + b
Reflection of line a --- x = ym + c ( shouldn't we flip x and y values to find reflection?)
Y = (1/m) x - ( c/ m )
So now slope of line b is (-1/m) & slope of reflected line is (1/m)
It looks like they will never be parallel because if one is + ve another is - ve.
Help me ? I don't know whether we should proceed this way or not.
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

bhandariavi,
For reflection on y- axis you don't have to flip x and y values .Just negate x-coordinate
The reflection of the point (x, y) across the y-axis is the point (-x, y).
The reflection of the point (x, y) across the line y = x is the point (y, x).
The reflection of the point (x, y) across the line y = -x is the point (-y, -x).
The reflection of the point (x, y) across the x-axis is the point (x, -y).

Hello onell
Due to reflection about y axis Not only the x flips sign but the slope of the line "also" flips sign. I believe your equation did not account for slope change. Pls correct me if this not true.

Posted from my mobile device

Hello onell
Strange! Let me try will coordinates. Let's say line a (slope 1) passes through (2,3) and upon reflection passes through (-2,3) slope=-1
Equation of line a (slope 1) is
(y-3)/(x-2) =1
y-3 =x-2
y=x+1 -----------(1)


The equation of the reflected line (slope -1) is
(y-3)/[x-(-2)]=-1
y-3=-1(x+2)
y-3 = -x - 2
y = -x + 1 ----------(2)

Two different equations. The slope of the line b which is perpendicular to a is -1. The slope of the reflected line is also -1. Hence E cannot be the answer.



Posted from my mobile device

Where is Bunuel? Plz help us!
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

Great Explanation Karishma ...Thank you so very much..
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

let the lines be
a ---> y = mx + c
b ---> y = nx + d

reflection of line 'a' around y-axis would be y = - mx + c

from the first statement,
mn = - 1

but we cannot decide whether they are parellel as '- m' can be or cannot be equal to 'n'.

from the second statement,

n>0

this signifies nothing regarding the relationship between slopes of the two lines, hence not sufficient

Even after combining both the statements, the data is insufficient

For example, if m = -1; n = 1
it satisfies both the statements and the lines are parellel

and for m = -0.5; n = 2
it satisfies both the equations and the lines are not parellel.

Ans. E