Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Aug 2015, 16:37
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Lines can be parallel in a Euclidean system of geometry. But

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 413
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Lines can be parallel in a Euclidean system of geometry. But [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2006, 10:37
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Lines can be parallel in a Euclidean system of geometry. But the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification is regarded by several prominent physicists as correctly describing the universe we inhabit. If these physicists are right, in our universe there are no parallel lines.

Which one of the following is an assumption that is required by the argument?

(A) There are no parallel lines in the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.

(B) Most physicists have not doubted the view that the universe is correctly described by the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.

(C) There are no parallel lines in every non-Euclidean system of geometry that has any empirical verification.

(D) The universe is correctly described by the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification if prominent physicists maintain that it is.

(E) Only physicists who are not prominent doubt the view that the universe is correctly described the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2910
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2006, 10:47
Hey gmacvik, welcome back buddy.

Your questions are really good, including this one. Most of questions you posted are there in my review logs.

Coming to the this question, I think it is C.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1266
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2006, 10:55
(A) There are no parallel lines in the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.


If we negate A... i.e there are parallel lines in the non-ESG, then the argument falls apart.

If there are parallel lines in non-ESG then the assertion that the universe has no parallel lines is not true as we can prove in non-ESG that there can be parallel lines.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 413
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2006, 11:02
Hi PS_Dahiya,
Yes I am back after a gap of a few months. Although I was always tracking this forum. I was really disappointed to see your score, and always felt that you deserved more than you got...

Anyways, coming to this problem, your answer is not correct
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 780
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2006, 11:21
haas_mba07 wrote:
(A) There are no parallel lines in the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.


If we negate A... i.e there are parallel lines in the non-ESG, then the argument falls apart.

If there are parallel lines in non-ESG then the assertion that the universe has no parallel lines is not true as we can prove in non-ESG that there can be parallel lines.


Ditto
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 50
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2006, 20:11
D...?
_________________

Woody crack the GMAT

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:Euclidean [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2006, 20:20
gmacvik wrote:
Lines can be parallel in a Euclidean system of geometry. But the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification is regarded by several prominent physicists as correctly describing the universe we inhabit. If these physicists are right, in our universe there are no parallel lines.

Which one of the following is an assumption that is required by the argument?

(A) There are no parallel lines in the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.

(B) Most physicists have not doubted the view that the universe is correctly described by the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.

(C) There are no parallel lines in every non-Euclidean system of geometry that has any empirical verification.

(D) The universe is correctly described by the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification if prominent physicists maintain that it is.

(E) Only physicists who are not prominent doubt the view that the universe is correctly described the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.


Choice comes to A and C.

Any in C cannot be defended..so A
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 237
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2006, 00:03
Is it A or C?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2006, 00:40
Yup should be A here...

It is down to A(most) and C(any)...

Now the passage talks about most and not any, which goes a bit beyond the argument...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 374
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2006, 00:48
A for me

The passage is assuming that there are no parallel lines in the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.

(A) There are no parallel lines in the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification.

(B) Most physicists have not doubted the view that the universe is correctly described by the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification. discard due to If these physicists are right

(C) There are no parallel lines in every non-Euclidean system of geometry that has any empirical verification. we are talking about 1 non Euc that has the most verification not all of them with verification.

(D) The universe is correctly described by the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification if prominent physicists maintain that it is. discard due to If these physicists are right

(E) Only physicists who are not prominent doubt the view that the universe is correctly described the non-Euclidean system of geometry that has the most empirical verification. discard due to If these physicists are right
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 579
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2006, 03:11
A.

not C because we don't need and we dont know that is the case for every non-euclidian systems with any verification.
A is sufficient as assumption to get to the conclusion.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5240
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2006, 00:56
(A) is the only answer choice that links the premise to the conclusion.
(even though I don't fully understand what the heck a non-euclidian geometric system is. :oops: )
  [#permalink] 08 Sep 2006, 00:56
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A new voice-recognition system can limit access to airplane garimavyas 2 14 May 2011, 00:09
A new voice-recognition system can limit access to airplane hemanthp 14 23 Sep 2010, 20:22
1 Systems magazine dimitri92 7 22 May 2010, 09:08
Lsat parallel reasoning tejal777 3 16 Sep 2009, 20:35
25 Burglar alarm systems can be inaccurate in two ways: they reply2spg 15 17 Feb 2009, 21:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Lines can be parallel in a Euclidean system of geometry. But

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.