Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 24 Sep 2016, 21:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Lines n and p lie in the xy-plane. Is the slope of line n

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Lines n and p lie in the xy-plane. Is the slope of line n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 18:24
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

80% (00:00) correct 20% (00:00) wrong based on 8 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Lines n and p lie in the xy-plane. Is the slope of line n less than the slope of line p?
(1) Line n and p intersect at point (5,1)
(2) The y intercept of line n is greater than the y- intercept of line p
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 208
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: DS: line n and p [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 19:10
dinesh8 wrote:
Lines n and p lie in the xy-plane. Is the slope of line n less than the slope of line p?
(1) Line n and p intersect at point (5,1)
(2) The y intercept of line n is greater than the y- intercept of line p

C?
1. alone doesnt give us much info, ie slope.
2. taking 2 alone still does surve the much.

taking both we know the common point, and since y-int of n is greater its slope is always less steepler or more negaive. so C.
VP
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1403
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 19:51
I am getting E..

What is both the slopes are negative? The one with larger incercept will have a larger slope!

But in case both are positive, the one with smaller intercept will have larger slope.
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 208
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 20:05
sm176811 wrote:
I am getting E..

What is both the slopes are negative? The one with larger incercept will have a larger slope!

But in case both are positive, the one with smaller intercept will have larger slope.

if both r negative, the one with larger y-int will have a larger negative slope. If a slope is more more negative, wouldn't that make it smaller? I know from a steepness point of view its not true. Please correct me, as I am little unsure. thanks
VP
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1403
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 20:09
Yeah, more -ve is smaller

Any number (in the negative range), the more netaive it is, the smaller it is!
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 208
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 20:15
sm176811 wrote:
Yeah, more -ve is smaller

Any number (in the negative range), the more netaive it is, the smaller it is!

Thanks, so n will always have a smaller slope then p, therefore C. rite?
VP
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1403
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 20:20
shampoo wrote:
sm176811 wrote:
Yeah, more -ve is smaller

Any number (in the negative range), the more netaive it is, the smaller it is!

Thanks, so n will always have a smaller slope then p, therefore C. rite?

Well for both +ve, n is smaller, both -ve n is larger!
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 208
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 20:41
sm176811 wrote:
shampoo wrote:
sm176811 wrote:
Yeah, more -ve is smaller

Any number (in the negative range), the more netaive it is, the smaller it is!

Thanks, so n will always have a smaller slope then p, therefore C. rite?

Well for both +ve, n is smaller, both -ve n is larger!

I disagree, I think n will always be smaller, since the y-int is lesser.
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 208
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 20:45
shampoo wrote:
sm176811 wrote:
shampoo wrote:
sm176811 wrote:
Yeah, more -ve is smaller

Any number (in the negative range), the more netaive it is, the smaller it is!

Thanks, so n will always have a smaller slope then p, therefore C. rite?

Well for both +ve, n is smaller, both -ve n is larger!

I disagree, I think n will always be smaller, since the y-int is lesser.

Then again when I think abut that slope=steepness of a line in that case the answer should be E.
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 208
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 May 2006, 08:48
Anyone else wanna comment on this?

What is the OA?
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1798
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 138 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 May 2006, 12:50
I think it's (C)

1) giving y = a(p)*x + b(p) and y = a(n)*x + b(n)

we have :
1= 5*a(p) + b(p)
1= 5*a(n) + b(n)

Not sufficient

2) is b(n) > b(p)

combining (1) and (2)

we have : 1-5*a(n) > 1-5*a(p)

which means : a(n) < a(p)
Intern
Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 27
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 May 2006, 13:18
Let N be : y= m1x+ c1
Let P be : y= m2x + c2

From 1st stmt, 1 = 5m1 + c1 ; 1 = 5m2 + c2
Hence, m1-m2 = (c2-c1)/5.

Insuff since we don't know the reln between c1 and c2.

From 2nd stmt, c1>c2. Insuff.

Combining, m1 - m2 < 0 -> m1 < m2

Hence, (C).
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 May 2006, 09:09
it have to be C.
Since they intersect on the 1st quadrant. One is rising faster than the other one.
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 May 2006, 13:26
The OA is C - I got this question on the GMATPrep test.

It still puzzles me a bit, though - I also think about that option when the y-intercepts of n and p are both positive.

Lets take point (0,4) as y-intersept of n, and point (0,3) as y-intersept of p

The slope of n is 4-1/0-5=-3/5=-0.6

The slope of p is 3-1/0-5=-2/5=-0.4

BUT -0.6>-0.4 IS NOT TRUE!!!

Can someone figure out this discrepancy and explain it in terms of real numbers, not formulas?

VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1059
Location: CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 May 2006, 01:03
luxmaria wrote:
The OA is C - I got this question on the GMATPrep test.

It still puzzles me a bit, though - I also think about that option when the y-intercepts of n and p are both positive.

Lets take point (0,4) as y-intersept of n, and point (0,3) as y-intersept of p

The slope of n is 4-1/0-5=-3/5=-0.6

The slope of p is 3-1/0-5=-2/5=-0.4

BUT -0.6>-0.4 IS NOT TRUE!!!

Can someone figure out this discrepancy and explain it in terms of real numbers, not formulas?

The questions asks "Is the slope of line n less than the slope of line p?"

Based on your number, -0.6 IS smaller than -0.4, so the answer is YES, C is sufficient
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

Intern
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 May 2006, 07:26
Thank you TeHCM!

How could I not see that?
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 156
Location: Europe
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 May 2006, 11:30
still no OA

IMO E
_________________

Stay hungry, Stay foolish

Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 780
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 May 2006, 11:37
Has to be C.

This is one of the questions that you would get in a flash if you drew a rough diagram
Display posts from previous: Sort by