Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Sep 2014, 15:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Local authorities are considering an amendment to the litter

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 223
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Local authorities are considering an amendment to the litter [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 05:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

44% (02:44) correct 56% (01:52) wrong based on 50 sessions
Local authorities are considering an amendment to the litter law that would raise the fine for littering in the community picnic area to $1,000. Since the inception of the litter law, incremental increases in the littering fine have proven to be consistently effective at further reducing the amount of litter in the community picnic area. However, raising the fine to $1,000 would actually have the unintended effect of increasing the amount of litter in the picnic area. Picnic area users would perceive this fine to be unreasonable and unenforceable, and would disregard the litter law altogether.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is irrefutable evidence that the author offers in support of a prediction; the second is that prediction.
B. The first is a statement of causation that the author predicts will be repeated in the case at hand; the second raises evidence against this prediction.
C. The first is a statement of fact that the author accepts to be true; the second is presented as a consequence of this fact.
D. The first is evidence that weakens the main position that the author defends; the second is that position.
E. The first is a statement of causation that the author predicts will not hold in the case at hand; the second offers a line of reasoning to support this prediction.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 223
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 05:51
OA to come this afternoon
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 272
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 07:06
IMO E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 332
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 07:26
"Local authorities are considering an amendment to the litter law that would raise the fine for littering in the community picnic area to $1,000."

Since the inception of the litter law, incremental increases in the littering fine have proven to be consistently effective at further reducing the amount of litter in the community picnic area.

However, raising the fine to $1,000 would actually have the unintended effect of increasing the amount of litter in the picnic area.

Picnic area users would perceive this fine to be unreasonable and unenforceable, and would disregard the litter law altogether.

I will go for B

"The first is a statement of causation that the author predicts will be repeated in the case at hand; the second raises evidence against this prediction.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 37

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 08:36
I'll go with E.

because tha author says "However, raising the fine to $1,000 would actually have the unintended effect of increasing the amount of litter in the picnic area". So he is sure the statement of causation is not going to work in this case and hence provided reasoning to support it.
_________________

Thanks, Sri
-------------------------------
keep uppp...ing the tempo...

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 08:56
IMO E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 10:05
IMO E
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 10:17
I will also go with E.
B seems incorrect as author never says that the first statement would hold true always.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 223
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2009, 11:12
OA is E

This answer choice correctly identifies the first bold portion as a statement of causation that does not support the author’s claim, and the second bold statement as a line of logic that does support this claim.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 708
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 37

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2011, 21:33
+1 for E.

Both the bold-face portions fall in the "claim" category,as opposed to "fact" category. Using this information we can eliminate A, B, C and D as these choices lists one of them as evidence/fact.

Crick
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Still Struggling
Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 139
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-15-2011
GPA: 3.71
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 8

Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 09 Sep 2011, 03:42
I am not sure why the OA is E.
the first statement reveals that the fine has been helpful in reducing the litter.
the 2nd statement reveals that the fine would be discarded completely.

The only option C justifies this. the first statement is assumed to be true(because of the hepfulness of the fine) and the seconf one is consequence of the fees that is predicted.

Can you guys please explain me why the ans is E?

hogann wrote:
Local authorities are considering an amendment to the litter law that would raise the fine for littering in the community picnic area to $1,000. Since the inception of the litter law, incremental increases in the littering fine have proven to be consistently effective at further reducing the amount of litter in the community picnic area. However, raising the fine to $1,000 would actually have the unintended effect of increasing the amount of litter in the picnic area. Picnic area users would perceive this fine to be unreasonable and unenforceable, and would disregard the litter law altogether.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is irrefutable evidence that the author offers in support of a prediction; the second is that prediction.
B. The first is a statement of causation that the author predicts will be repeated in the case at hand; the second raises evidence against this prediction.
C. The first is a statement of fact that the author accepts to be true; the second is presented as a consequence of this fact.
D. The first is evidence that weakens the main position that the author defends; the second is that position.
E. The first is a statement of causation that the author predicts will not hold in the case at hand; the second offers a line of reasoning to support this prediction.

_________________

Appreciation in KUDOS please!
Knewton Free Test 10/03 - 710 (49/37)
Princeton Free Test 10/08 - 610 (44/31)
Kaplan Test 1- 10/10 - 630
Veritas Prep- 10/11 - 630 (42/37)
MGMAT 1 - 10/12 - 680 (45/34)

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 109
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 15

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 09 Sep 2011, 10:06
hogann wrote:
Local authorities are considering an amendment to the litter law that would raise the fine for littering in the community picnic area to $1,000. Since the inception of the litter law, incremental increases in the littering fine have proven to be consistently effective at further reducing the amount of litter in the community picnic area. However, raising the fine to $1,000 would actually have the unintended effect of increasing the amount of litter in the picnic area. Picnic area users would perceive this fine to be unreasonable and unenforceable, and would disregard the litter law altogether.

In the argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is irrefutable evidence that the author offers in support of a prediction; the second is that prediction.
B. The first is a statement of causation that the author predicts will be repeated in the case at hand; the second raises evidence against this prediction.
C. The first is a statement of fact that the author accepts to be true; the second is presented as a consequence of this fact.
D. The first is evidence that weakens the main position that the author defends; the second is that position.
E. The first is a statement of causation that the author predicts will not hold in the case at hand; the second offers a line of reasoning to support this prediction.



Chose D but now understand why E is correct.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: MBAing!!!!
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 311
Location: United States (FL)
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.65
WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 56

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 09 Sep 2011, 13:36
I picked B.
1-this boldface statement is part of a possible cause and effect relationship
2-this boldface statement contradicts the 1st statement

I understand why the OA is E. :?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2011, 01:13
IMO E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 201
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 21

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2011, 06:17
Very good question. I was just watching B and E to select the right one. Finally guessed E.
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 193
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 21

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2011, 10:56
yup +1 for E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 92
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2011, 10:09
E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 201
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 21

GMAT Tests User
Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering [#permalink] New post 14 Sep 2011, 04:27
E it is :)
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Re: Tuesday Q3 - Littering   [#permalink] 14 Sep 2011, 04:27
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Local authorities are considering an amendment to the litter aditi1903 8 09 Oct 2012, 23:15
1 RC: Federal Authorities, local witnesses hbs2012 13 13 Oct 2008, 05:07
consider bmwhype2 12 17 Jun 2007, 21:14
Resident: Residents of this locale should not consider their ronybtl 14 01 Nov 2005, 05:50
Consider To be saurabhmalpani 10 07 May 2005, 17:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Local authorities are considering an amendment to the litter

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.