Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 02 Dec 2016, 10:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 981 [0], given: 1

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2009, 18:47
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?
(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed.
(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly.
(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species.
(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose.
(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests.
_________________
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 256
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 1

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2009, 18:57
IMO B

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?
(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed -->animal species endangered are out of scope
(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly -->the best: it weakens the argument that manufacturing from material of old grown trees can reduce the release of carbon dioxide. Nevertheless, organic matter from old growth trees, when made into products, decomposes rapidly and thereby, releasing carbon dioxide
(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species -->counter fact
(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose -->too general
(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests -->irrelevant
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 431
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 4

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2009, 20:03
I'll go with C

The stem says that " harvesting trees from old growth forests will reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere" and the reasoning is - "the young trees will have more capacity to absorb CO2 than do the old trees"

C counters the above fact by saying that " the young trees have less than half of the amount of CO2 that old trees have"

Hence C weakens the argument

Cheers,
Unplugged
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 329
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 5

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2009, 04:06
I will aldo go For C. B and D lures us by contadicting the evidence but C attacks the conclusion.
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 256
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 1

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2009, 04:24
tkarthi4u wrote:
I will aldo go For C. B and D lures us by contadicting the evidence but C attacks the conclusion.

The argument here is: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

The final sentence is just another premise helps to reach to the argument: Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests --> help to emphasize the argument that Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 265
Location: nj
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 2

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 May 2009, 07:04
I agree with B on this.

It directly counter the conclusion by saying that the products of that manufacturing process decompose rapidly (and hence releasing CO2) so harvesting the trees for manufacturing is not a good idea.
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 981 [0], given: 1

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2009, 02:49
OA is B
_________________
Re: Old-growth forests   [#permalink] 23 May 2009, 02:49
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 Petrochemical industry officials have said that the extreme pressure e 9 15 Jun 2016, 11:53
2 A decade after a logging operation in India began cutting down trees 9 16 Feb 2016, 06:41
15 Error log - Comprehensive Collection Of Everything Official 4 05 Jul 2014, 00:26
1 When a caterpillar emerges from the egg on a tree branch, it 6 10 May 2008, 18:05
21 United Lumber will use trees from its forests for two 18 28 Feb 2007, 23:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.