Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 02:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!!

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [3] , given: 0

Reviews Badge
Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!! [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2012, 07:51
3
This post received
KUDOS
I gave my first attempt back in Sep 2009. I scored 610(Q43, V31). I did not expect such a low score then. I had prepared for over 6 months with utmost sincerity. Such was the disaster that I did not even bother to analyze what went wrong. One of my friends, though, advised me to retake the test after due preparation and to take the test only when I see an improvement in my preparations. That proved to be very true.

Now by the start of this year, I decided to give my second attempt and do things differently. Though there was a gap of nearly two years, my force to ace GMAT was no less. As a BITSian I knew it wouldn’t be too hard to score 46-50 in Quant. But as a non-native I needed better preparation in Verbal. Like Quant, Verbal can be aced with proper fundamentals, understanding and strategic attack. Below I have shared a few things that probably helped me in achieving 700(Q48, V37).

Fundamentals:

You might have heard this over and over again. Be strong in your fundamentals. This applies to both Quant and Verbal. For Quant, we have tons of reliable resources in the web: MGMAT Quant Strategy Guides, Kaplan GMAT Math Workbook and GMATClub WorkBook topics to name a few. I too relied on these resources to understand the nuances of certain GMAT format questions such as Work-Rate problems, Probability and Statistics problems and Inequalities problems. These are not complicated when you know what to look out for. For instance, you have to be so clear about the reasoning behind the work-rate question ‘A works for 12 hours to finish a job, B works for 14 hours to finish the same job and what would be the time taken to complete the same job when A & B works together’ that you can understand a complex question with jargons.

Similarly for Data Sufficiency questions, you should improve your reasoning to a stage where you can connect the dots between the questions that you practiced (during practice tests, GC forum questions, etc.) and the questions that come up on the test day. Of course none of the questions that you faced during your preparations is going to pop-up on your test day. But the logic will.

Is Verbal an up-hill task?

Yes and No. Yes because we either think that there is no one procedure to get the exact correct answer or that process of elimination is the ONLY way to get the ‘best’ answer. I strongly disagree here. There is a way to get to the exact answer (note not the best answer). That’s because GMAT has a pattern in framing the logic behind its questions. Note I said logic not the structure. Most of the resources out there teach you the structure of the GMAT questions: how to use advanced negation technique in an assumption-type CR questions or how to memorize the usual idioms or how to quickly read a four paragraph RC question. Believe me. This doesn’t work.

I said no because I used the e-GMAT Verbal Live product which showed me these logical procedures to answer the Verbal questions. I have to say here that I’m not part of the marketing team from e-GMAT. I am genuinely ‘just’ a customer of e-GMAT. I got to know them only through GMATClub.

Coming back to the logics, here are my thoughts for Verbal Question types:

Sentence Correction:
The GMAT SC questions from the Official Guide teach us certain important patterns. These patterns include but not limited to misplaced modifiers, logical parallel lists and many more. These cannot be answered in a mechanized manner. Because the answers might be grammatically correct but logically wrong. Only when the intended meaning of the sentence is clear, you can get to the correct answer. Again the OG teaches to eliminate the wrong choices because of very specific reasons. When this line of reasoning becomes intuitive the process of elimination becomes more logical and you get the ‘correct’ answer.

Critical Reasoning:
I learnt to better eliminate the incorrect answer choices through e-GMAT’s CR Course. I religiously followed the pre-thinking process as taught and improved in my timing to answer CR questions. Again here efficient elimination techniques come handy because GMAT throws in errors in a certain way which can be identified after thorough practice.

Reading Comprehension:
Though there is no one way to master this question type, the only proven way is to logically attack each RC question type. For that you need razor-sharp focus while reading the passage. When you focus on the structure and tone of the passage, the main crux will become evident. Per e-GMAT process, the passage summaries at various stages of reading the passage prove enough to answer the questions correctly. This helped me a lot as I was always struggling with RC.

On the Test Day:
Have fun! I mean, relax and look forward to enjoy the process. I tried to smile at various points to ease myself and to not think about what happened in the previous question. Of course this is not easy unless you practice it during the practice tests. I recommend taking MGMAT practice tests and review the questions to understand the source of errors. GMAT test will be lot easier after taking MGMAT tests. This might have a side-effect on you on the test day. That is, you might end up feeling that you screwed up the test. But actually you dint. That’s how I felt after each section. But I thought I ended up with a decent score. Thanks GMATClub, e-GMAT and MGMAT for helping me out in the process.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 6

Re: Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!! [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2012, 21:55
Kudos for your score and debrief. Is prethinking same as prephrasing. What kind of questions did you use it for.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Posts: 13
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 6

Re: Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!! [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2012, 21:59
Do you think that Kaplan GMAT math workbook is sufficient for GMAT. Were the problems on the real test similar to the level in the Kaplan book. Are there other good cheap resources for math.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!! [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2012, 07:42
mehtamanish wrote:
Kudos for your score and debrief. Is prethinking same as prephrasing. What kind of questions did you use it for.


Yes! Prethinking is same as prephrasing. This technique is applicable primarily for the question types for which you would answer just based on the info from the argument: Assumption questions, Must be true questions, Conclusion questions.

But you can also use this for other question types because prethinking helps you to get to the frame of mind to eliminate the incorrect answer choices.

It definitely helps but don't spend more than 10 seconds to prethink. If you couldn't its still okay. Go ahead with process of elimination.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!! [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2012, 07:45
sanketsharma wrote:
Do you think that Kaplan GMAT math workbook is sufficient for GMAT. Were the problems on the real test similar to the level in the Kaplan book. Are there other good cheap resources for math.


If you think you are too weak in Quant, then go for Kaplan GMAT workbook. If you think you are an average student in Quant, then quickly revise your math from MGMAT books. GMAT math is definitely NOT in the same league as Kaplan Math & MGMAT Math. Nevertheless the hard questions will help you to build your math foundation to handle easy/medium level questions.
Re: Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!!   [#permalink] 06 Nov 2012, 07:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 610 to 700, DO NOT GIVE UP canadianbroski 1 12 Feb 2014, 17:33
9 Experts publish their posts in the topic 610 to 700 in a month? sns 7 30 Mar 2013, 09:48
Experts publish their posts in the topic Help: increase from 610 to 670-700 alph888 2 11 Nov 2011, 21:18
610-700 in month and a half? db1000 4 14 Oct 2011, 05:49
Around 700 in practice tests. 610 in real GMAT :( mist4u 2 27 Sep 2011, 12:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Logic came to rescue (610 to 700)!!!

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: m3equals333, TGC



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.