Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 21:38 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 21:38

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1012
Own Kudos [?]: 1629 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2003
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Eternal Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2003
Posts: 297
Own Kudos [?]: 1480 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Lone Star State
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
It's strange - A just sums up the last sentence, but it fits best.
My ans is A
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 392
Own Kudos [?]: 468 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: New York NY 10024
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
We are asked for a premise that is CENTRAL to the conclusion that "the combination ... is most promising".

The strategy I recommend for identifying the correct choice for this type of question is to ask yourself: if this choice were NOT true, would the conclusion still be valid or reasonable?

If A were not true, then the conclusion that the combination is "most promissing" implying that it is considered THE best, compared to all of the others is certainly not true, since psychotherapy alone would be at least as, or more effective than, the combination.

IMO, none of the other choices, if NOT true, weakens the conclusion as much as the contra of A does.
avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1012
Own Kudos [?]: 1629 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
A is the answer.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
A is the answer....simply b/c EVERY OTHER CHOICE CAN BE EASILY ELIMINATED
CEO
CEO
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 2887
Own Kudos [?]: 1117 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
(A) is clearly stated in the passage. Negate it and nothing makes any sense.

1:10
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 1490
Own Kudos [?]: 1133 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 Q50  V34
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
GMATT73 wrote:
(A) is clearly stated in the passage. Negate it and nothing makes any sense.

1:10

That is true. But I think this question is not a GMAT type question. In GMAT assumptions are never stated in the argument.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 2887
Own Kudos [?]: 1117 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
ps_dahiya wrote:
GMATT73 wrote:
(A) is clearly stated in the passage. Negate it and nothing makes any sense.

1:10

That is true. But I think this question is not a GMAT type question. In GMAT assumptions are never stated in the argument.


Are you absolutely sure about that? I have seen a few other CRs floating around here where the central assumption was nearly "word for word ver batem" stated in the passage. Then again, they could have been LSAT/GRE questions. Sometimes it`s hard to make the distinction. :?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 152
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
GMATT73 wrote:
ps_dahiya wrote:
GMATT73 wrote:
(A) is clearly stated in the passage. Negate it and nothing makes any sense.

1:10

That is true. But I think this question is not a GMAT type question. In GMAT assumptions are never stated in the argument.


Are you absolutely sure about that? I have seen a few other CRs floating around here where the central assumption was nearly "word for word ver batem" stated in the passage. Then again, they could have been LSAT/GRE questions. Sometimes it`s hard to make the distinction. :?


Yup I can second that assumptions on the GMAT are not stated in the passage rather just the one that links the premise/fact to the conclusion.

A is the only clear one here though...
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 1490
Own Kudos [?]: 1133 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 Q50  V34
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
GMATT73 wrote:
ps_dahiya wrote:
GMATT73 wrote:
(A) is clearly stated in the passage. Negate it and nothing makes any sense.

1:10

That is true. But I think this question is not a GMAT type question. In GMAT assumptions are never stated in the argument.


Are you absolutely sure about that? I have seen a few other CRs floating around here where the central assumption was nearly "word for word ver batem" stated in the passage. Then again, they could have been LSAT/GRE questions. Sometimes it`s hard to make the distinction. :?

NO ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. But generally this is the case. I have not seen a single CR in OG11, OG Verbal Review, ETS paper tests, OG10 that has the assumption stated in the argument.

Disclaimer: I have not completed the above material so you may find some of the CRs that have the assumptions stated in the argument.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 603
Own Kudos [?]: 673 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Concentration: Strategy
Schools:Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
 Q48  V33 GMAT 2: 670  Q46  V36 GMAT 3: 720  Q49  V40
Send PM
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
A looked more like an inference to me. At least the one thing I have understood about Assumptions is that they are the MISSING links as opposed to being Visible links. But then, another way of looking at A is that indeed it is quite central to the argument. If it is negated then the argument falls.

But i was confused with the inference thing..



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: LR FROM LSAT 2 [#permalink]
Moderators:
Retired Moderator
654 posts
Current Student
733 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne