Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Jul 2014, 10:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

LSAT Kasheska: Chain of Reasoning over Italian Wine

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Eternal Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2003
Posts: 480
Location: Lone Star State
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
LSAT Kasheska: Chain of Reasoning over Italian Wine [#permalink] New post 27 Jul 2003, 11:13
All actors are exuberant people and all exuberant people are extroverts, but nevertheless it is true that some shy people are actors.
Which of the following are not true? (A) Some shy people are extroverts
( B) Some shy extroverts are not actors
Suspicion: Do we start here
Some shy people are actors. In order to be a shy extrovert, it must be that some shy people are actors. ? All actors have to be exuberant. This leads them to being extroverted. Thus, some shy extroverts have to be actors.

C) Some exuberant people who are actors are shy.

D) All people who are not extroverts are not actors.
E) Some extroverts are shy.

Last edited by Curly05 on 28 Jul 2003, 07:00, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1613
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Jul 2003, 20:37
I cannot choose among B, C, and D.
but vote for C in the final analysis
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT Kasheska: Chain of Reasoning over Italian Wine [#permalink] New post 27 Jul 2003, 23:10
Curly05 wrote:
All actors are exuberant people and all exuberant people are extroverts, but nevertheless it is true that some shy people are actors.

(A) Some shy people are extroverts
( B) Some shy extroverts are not actors
Suspicion: Do we start here
Some shy people are actors. In order to be a shy extrovert, it must be that some shy people are actors. ? All actors have to be exuberant. This leads them to being extroverted. Thus, some shy extroverts have to be actors.

C) Some exuberant people who are actors are shy.

D) All people who are not extroverts are not actors.
E) Some extroverts are shy.


Hey Curly:

Are you sure you didn't leave out some crucial part ot the question. Maybe something like: Which of the following is NOT necessarily true?

A). Since ALL actors are both exuberant and extroverts, and some shy people are actors, then those shy people who are actors are also extroverts. (TRUE)

B) There is nothing in the statement that precludes the possibility that of all the extroverts, ONLY actors are shy. If that is so then B is FALSE.

C). Since all actors are exuberant, those actors that are shy are also exuberant. TRUE

D). Since all actors are extroverts (if "ACTOR" then "EXTROVERT"), then if you are not an extrovert, you cannot be an actor (contrapositive: if NOT "EXTROVERT" then NOT "ACTOR"). TRUE

E). Since all actors are extroverts, those actors that are shy are also extrovert. TRUE
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Eternal Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2003
Posts: 480
Location: Lone Star State
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2003, 07:03
Is my chain of reasoning, right?

:lol:
Explain, captain akami, why B is wrong.
_________________

Ride em cowboy

GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2003, 16:20
Curly05 wrote:
Is my chain of reasoning, right?

:lol:
Explain, captain akami, why B is wrong.


B) There is nothing in the statement that precludes the possibility that of all the extroverts, ONLY actors are shy. If that is so then B is FALSE.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

  [#permalink] 28 Jul 2003, 16:20
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic LSAT Logical Reasoning - Relevant Chapters jrawls 4 08 Apr 2012, 14:17
Powerscore CR or LSAT Logical Reasoning? Shoumik 0 31 May 2011, 17:14
LSAT critical reasoning tests elevinty 0 02 Apr 2010, 09:51
Lsat parallel reasoning tejal777 3 16 Sep 2009, 20:35
Does anyone know if the Powerscore LSAT Logic Reasoning kilograms 3 15 Oct 2008, 07:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

LSAT Kasheska: Chain of Reasoning over Italian Wine

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.