Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Jun 2013, 19:20
Customize  |  Hide

LSAT Kasheska: Chain of Reasoning over Italian Wine

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
Eternal Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2003
Posts: 484
Location: Lone Star State
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
LSAT Kasheska: Chain of Reasoning over Italian Wine [#permalink] New post 27 Jul 2003, 12:13
All actors are exuberant people and all exuberant people are extroverts, but nevertheless it is true that some shy people are actors.
Which of the following are not true? (A) Some shy people are extroverts
( B) Some shy extroverts are not actors
Suspicion: Do we start here
Some shy people are actors. In order to be a shy extrovert, it must be that some shy people are actors. ? All actors have to be exuberant. This leads them to being extroverted. Thus, some shy extroverts have to be actors.

C) Some exuberant people who are actors are shy.

D) All people who are not extroverts are not actors.
E) Some extroverts are shy.

Last edited by Curly05 on 28 Jul 2003, 08:00, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1680
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Jul 2003, 21:37
I cannot choose among B, C, and D.
but vote for C in the final analysis
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 773
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT Kasheska: Chain of Reasoning over Italian Wine [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2003, 00:10
Curly05 wrote:
All actors are exuberant people and all exuberant people are extroverts, but nevertheless it is true that some shy people are actors.

(A) Some shy people are extroverts
( B) Some shy extroverts are not actors
Suspicion: Do we start here
Some shy people are actors. In order to be a shy extrovert, it must be that some shy people are actors. ? All actors have to be exuberant. This leads them to being extroverted. Thus, some shy extroverts have to be actors.

C) Some exuberant people who are actors are shy.

D) All people who are not extroverts are not actors.
E) Some extroverts are shy.


Hey Curly:

Are you sure you didn't leave out some crucial part ot the question. Maybe something like: Which of the following is NOT necessarily true?

A). Since ALL actors are both exuberant and extroverts, and some shy people are actors, then those shy people who are actors are also extroverts. (TRUE)

B) There is nothing in the statement that precludes the possibility that of all the extroverts, ONLY actors are shy. If that is so then B is FALSE.

C). Since all actors are exuberant, those actors that are shy are also exuberant. TRUE

D). Since all actors are extroverts (if "ACTOR" then "EXTROVERT"), then if you are not an extrovert, you cannot be an actor (contrapositive: if NOT "EXTROVERT" then NOT "ACTOR"). TRUE

E). Since all actors are extroverts, those actors that are shy are also extrovert. TRUE
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Eternal Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2003
Posts: 484
Location: Lone Star State
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2003, 08:03
Is my chain of reasoning, right?

:lol:
Explain, captain akami, why B is wrong.
_________________

Ride em cowboy

GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 773
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2003, 17:20
Curly05 wrote:
Is my chain of reasoning, right?

:lol:
Explain, captain akami, why B is wrong.


B) There is nothing in the statement that precludes the possibility that of all the extroverts, ONLY actors are shy. If that is so then B is FALSE.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

  [#permalink] 28 Jul 2003, 17:20
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts LSAT Kasheska Stolyar Style- with Wine- Explain Curly05 7 21 Jul 2003, 21:08
New posts LSAT Style with Kasheska- Australian Wine for this Curly05 1 21 Jul 2003, 21:27
New posts LSAT Kasheska Weird One Curly05 9 24 Jul 2003, 19:52
New posts Lsat parallel reasoning tejal777 3 16 Sep 2009, 21:35
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New LSAT critical reasoning tests elevinty 0 02 Apr 2010, 10:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

LSAT Kasheska: Chain of Reasoning over Italian Wine

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.