|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 327
Location: MI
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
M: It is almost impossible to find a person between the ages [#permalink]
 17 Dec 2003, 10:46
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
M: It is almost impossible to find a person between the ages of 85 an 90 who primarily uses the left hand.
Q: Seventy to ninety years ago, however, children were punished for using their left hands to eat or to write and were forced to use their right hands.
Q's response serves to counter any use by M of the evidence about 85 to 90 year olds in supports of which one of the following hypotheses?
(A) Being born right-handed confers a survival advantage.
(B) Societal attitudes toward handedness differ at different times.
(C) Forcing a person to switch from a preferred hand is harmless.
(D) Handedness is a product of both genetic predisposition and social pressures.
(E) Physical habits learned in school often persist in old age.
Last edited by asandeep on 17 Dec 2003, 11:51, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 560
Location: Aus
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Is it B ?
Shouldn't children were published for using their left hands be children were punished for using their left hands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
D or E
no mention of the school, so, I guess social pressue was the factor.
D??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 274
Location: USA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
vote for A
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55
Kudos [?]:
626
[0], given: 781
|
Re: CR - Hypotheses [#permalink]
17 Dec 2003, 12:57
asandeep wrote: M: It is almost impossible to find a person between the ages of 85 an 90 who primarily uses the left hand.
Q: Seventy to ninety years ago, however, children were punished for using their left hands to eat or to write and were forced to use their right hands.
Q's response serves to counter any use by M of the evidence about 85 to 90 year olds in supports of which one of the following hypotheses?
(A) Being born right-handed confers a survival advantage.
(B) Societal attitudes toward handedness differ at different times.
(C) Forcing a person to switch from a preferred hand is harmless.
(D) Handedness is a product of both genetic predisposition and social pressures.
(E) Physical habits learned in school often persist in old age.
B is best.
We want Q to defend hypo that social pressures influence handedness.
Q does not defend choice D. it would be contradictory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 27 Nov 2003
Posts: 39
Location: Moscow
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
The way I understood it , question is to identify M's hypothesis.
So, I believe it's A
_________________
me
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
M infers that lefthandedness is a good reason to die young.
Q dismisses this inference by destoying the evidence (there are in fact many lefthanded old people but they were pressed to use their right hand)
D and E are the best; however, E mentions schools and so narrows the scope.
D is the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 327
Location: MI
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Official ans : A
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
wow..!
these one was over the head
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55
Kudos [?]:
626
[0], given: 781
|
asandeep wrote: Official ans : A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 274
Location: USA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 327
Location: MI
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
This was a LSAT question...LSAT questions always beat the hell out of you... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
asandeep wrote: This was a LSAT question...LSAT questions always beat the hell out of you... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
Yeah... LSAT is tough.
Do you have an official explanation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55
Kudos [?]:
626
[0], given: 781
|
anvar wrote: The way I understood it , question is to identify M's hypothesis.
So, I believe it's A
i think that makes sense.
smartly worded question 
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55
Kudos [?]:
626
[0], given: 781
|
stolyar wrote: Yeah... LSAT is tough.
Do you have an official explanation?
i dont know whether you made the same mistake i made.
but we have to look for M's hypothesis, not Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
praetorian123 wrote: stolyar wrote: Yeah... LSAT is tough.
Do you have an official explanation? i dont know whether you made the same mistake i made. but we have to look for M's hypothesis, not Q. Yes, now I see. The lords of the words...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
