M01#26 : Retired Discussions [Locked] - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 03:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# M01#26

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1672
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 514 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

05 May 2011, 04:34
The answer is E :

(1) 2 is a multiple of itself ( a prime #)

(2) 2 is a multiple of 1 and 2
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 757
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 42

### Show Tags

05 May 2011, 05:41
My answer is E.

1. Not sufficient
1*prime =prime
2*prime = not prime

2. Not sufficient

Same examples from 1 can be applied here.

1*prime =prime
2*prime = not prime

Together it's still not sufficient.
Considering Product of two integers also multiple of prime

1*prime =prime
2*prime = not prime

Posted from my mobile device
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2021
Followers: 161

Kudos [?]: 1701 [0], given: 376

### Show Tags

05 May 2011, 06:17
Bunuel wrote:
On the GMAT when we are told that $$a$$ is divisible by $$b$$ (or which is the same: "$$a$$ is multiple of $$b$$", or "$$b$$ is a factor of $$a$$"), we can say that:
1. $$a$$ is an integer;
2. $$b$$ is an integer;

Really!!!!
What if a=1.5 and b=1.5; 'a' is divisible by 'b' but 'a' and 'b' are not integers. Can someone clear my doubt because it's highly unlikely that Bunuel will respond?
_________________
Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 6
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

06 May 2011, 00:10
E for me

Question: If x is an integer, is x a prime number?

Statement1: x is a multiple of a prime number --> Insufficient
Let's pick x = 2 and 4
If x = 2, 2 is a multiple of 2 (2 x 1), and 2 is a prime number Ans --> Yes
If x = 4, 4 is a multiple of 2 (2 x 2), but 4 is NOT a prime number Ans --> No

Statement2: x is a product of two integers --> Insufficient
Let's pick x =2 and 4 again
2 = 2 x 1 , and 2 is a prime number Ans --> Yes
4 = 4 x 1 , but 4 is NOT a prime number Ans --> No

If we take statement#1&#2 together, the given information is still insufficient to determine whether x is a prime number.
Let's try x = 2, 4 again
2 is a multiple of a prime number and 2 is a product of two integers (2 x 1 = 2) Ans --> Yes (2 is a prime number)
4 is a multiple of a prime number (2) and 4 is a product of two integers (4 x 1 = 4) Ans --> No (4 is NOT a prime number)
_________________

"You can do it if you believe you can!" - Napoleon Hill
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 175
WE: Design (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 69

### Show Tags

08 May 2011, 03:33
A....is x a prime number....so according to choice A x is not a prime no and from choice b there can be no conclusion.
so correct choice is A
_________________

Kaustubh

Manager
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 156
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 71

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2011, 10:31
mehtakaustubh wrote:
A....is x a prime number....so according to choice A x is not a prime no and from choice b there can be no conclusion.
so correct choice is A

No.
The answer is E. Because based on the S1 you can reach to for example 3, 6, 9, ...
3 is prime but the others are not.
So A is insufficient
Intern
Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V40
GPA: 3.78
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 55

### Show Tags

10 May 2012, 12:56
seofah wrote:
If $$x$$ is an integer, is $$x$$ a prime number?

1. $$x$$ is a multiple of a prime number
2. $$x$$ is a product of two integers

Source: GMAT Club Tests - hardest GMAT questions

Statement 1: insufficient
Why?
2 is a prime number.
2 x 1 = 2 (and thus a prime number)
but 2 x 2 = 4 (not a prime number)
Conclusion: insufficient

Statement 2: insufficient
Why?
2 x 1 = 2 (and thus a prime number)
but 2 x 2 = 4 (not a prime number)
Conclusion: insufficient

Statements 1 & 2: insufficient
Why?
Same explanation as above. Even with the two statements together, I didn't notice anything new or special from it that I can form. Thus, the same two explanations from above can be used.

Conclusion: None of the statements are sufficient to solve the mystery!
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 May 2012, 18:28
Why not C
1. multiple of prime.. ok. 3*2... any thing not sufficient
2. product of 2 integer. 3*1, 4*1 no sufficient.

from both,Hello but see, if product of 2 integer, one of them must be 1.
from a. product of a prime. so samalest prime is 2.
so it may me 2*1. 3*1, 5*1.. hense prime.
so answer should be C.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36508
Followers: 7063

Kudos [?]: 92853 [0], given: 10528

### Show Tags

10 May 2013, 04:47
fluke wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
On the GMAT when we are told that $$a$$ is divisible by $$b$$ (or which is the same: "$$a$$ is multiple of $$b$$", or "$$b$$ is a factor of $$a$$"), we can say that:
1. $$a$$ is an integer;
2. $$b$$ is an integer;

Really!!!!
What if a=1.5 and b=1.5; 'a' is divisible by 'b' but 'a' and 'b' are not integers. Can someone clear my doubt because it's highly unlikely that Bunuel will respond?

Yes.

Every GMAT divisibility question will tell you in advance that any unknowns represent positive integers, which means that ALL GMAT divisibility questions are limited to positive integers only.

Thus 1.5 is divisible by 1.5 makes no sense as far as GMAT is concerned.
_________________
Intern
Status: Rotterdam Erasmus; McGill Desautels UBC Sauder - Admitted
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 27
Schools: ISB, INSEAD, Harvard, Warton
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 34

### Show Tags

12 May 2013, 03:11
Paris92978 wrote:
Can we revisit this one?

Statement (1) says that x is a multiple of a prime number. Well, that immediately tells us that x is not a prime number because we can factor the a multiple. So now choices B, C, and E are eliminated.

Statement (2) says that x is a product of two integers. Well, we could look at the case of 2 * 3 = 6 but more importantly there is the case of 1 * any prime number. With the case of the 1 * prime number, choice D is eliminated.

Agree with you Paris.. just putting in a bit more inputs..

Case 1: X is a multiple of a prime number
-> A number having any factor other than itself and 1 is not a prime no. For example: 6 (1, 2, 3,6) is not a prime no.
Please note, that "1" is not a prime number, but rather a co-prime no... so don;t confuse yourself by saying that 7 = 1*7 is a possibility in above case.

Option A is sufficient

Case 2: X is a product of two integers
-> Here there can be two type of number:
(i) Prime numbers. Eg. 7 = 1* 7
(ii) Non-prime numbers : 14 = 7 * 2

Not sufficient

Hence, the answer is (a)
_________________

-- Because beauty Lies in the Eyes.. So donate those eyes

KUDOS if like the post ...

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36508
Followers: 7063

Kudos [?]: 92853 [0], given: 10528

### Show Tags

12 May 2013, 03:28
WannabeTitan wrote:
Paris92978 wrote:
Can we revisit this one?

Statement (1) says that x is a multiple of a prime number. Well, that immediately tells us that x is not a prime number because we can factor the a multiple. So now choices B, C, and E are eliminated.

Statement (2) says that x is a product of two integers. Well, we could look at the case of 2 * 3 = 6 but more importantly there is the case of 1 * any prime number. With the case of the 1 * prime number, choice D is eliminated.

Agree with you Paris.. just putting in a bit more inputs..

Case 1: X is a multiple of a prime number
-> A number having any factor other than itself and 1 is not a prime no. For example: 6 (1, 2, 3,6) is not a prime no.
Please note, that "1" is not a prime number, but rather a co-prime no... so don;t confuse yourself by saying that 7 = 1*7 is a possibility in above case.

Option A is sufficient

Case 2: X is a product of two integers
-> Here there can be two type of number:
(i) Prime numbers. Eg. 7 = 1* 7
(ii) Non-prime numbers : 14 = 7 * 2

Not sufficient

Hence, the answer is (a)

The correct answer s E, not A.

If x is an integer, then is x a prime number?

(1) x is a multiple of a prime number --> if x=2 then the answer is Yes, but if x=4 then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) x is a product of two integers --> the same here: if x=1*2=2 then the asnwer is Yes, but if x=1*4=4 then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) The same xample: if x=2 then the asnwer is Yes, but if x=4 then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

_________________
Intern
Status: Rotterdam Erasmus; McGill Desautels UBC Sauder - Admitted
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 27
Schools: ISB, INSEAD, Harvard, Warton
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 34

### Show Tags

12 May 2013, 03:53
Bunuel wrote:
WannabeTitan wrote:
Paris92978 wrote:
Can we revisit this one?

Statement (1) says that x is a multiple of a prime number. Well, that immediately tells us that x is not a prime number because we can factor the a multiple. So now choices B, C, and E are eliminated.

Statement (2) says that x is a product of two integers. Well, we could look at the case of 2 * 3 = 6 but more importantly there is the case of 1 * any prime number. With the case of the 1 * prime number, choice D is eliminated.

Agree with you Paris.. just putting in a bit more inputs..

Case 1: X is a multiple of a prime number
-> A number having any factor other than itself and 1 is not a prime no. For example: 6 (1, 2, 3,6) is not a prime no.
Please note, that "1" is not a prime number, but rather a co-prime no... so don;t confuse yourself by saying that 7 = 1*7 is a possibility in above case.

Option A is sufficient

Case 2: X is a product of two integers
-> Here there can be two type of number:
(i) Prime numbers. Eg. 7 = 1* 7
(ii) Non-prime numbers : 14 = 7 * 2

Not sufficient

Hence, the answer is (a)

The correct answer s E, not A.

If x is an integer, then is x a prime number?

(1) x is a multiple of a prime number --> if x=2 then the answer is Yes, but if x=4 then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) x is a product of two integers --> the same here: if x=1*2=2 then the asnwer is Yes, but if x=1*4=4 then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) The same xample: if x=2 then the asnwer is Yes, but if x=4 then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

Bunuel I guess you didn't read the "Please note..." line i mentioned just after the case 1 in my explanation.. In order to emphasize my point that "One" is not a prime number I provide you the following links..

http://primes.utm.edu/notes/faq/one.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number

You will find the common definition of Prime Number as -> "Any number greater than 1 but divisible only by itself and 1 is called a prime number..
_________________

-- Because beauty Lies in the Eyes.. So donate those eyes

KUDOS if like the post ...

Intern
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2014, 13:08
Statement 1 is clearly trying to get us to think about multiples of a number. Let us remember that a multiple of a number, in this case a prime number, is the product of itself and any integer. Therefore, we can try to prove that this statement is not sufficient by using the following examples:

1x2 = 2 is a prime number.
2x2 = 4 is not a prime number.

Therefore, statement 1 is not sufficient since two examples that satisfy the condition presented by the statement provide two different answers.

Statement 2 is just another way to present statement 1. We could argue that statement 1 is a particular or specific case of statement 2. Therefore statement is even less specific and more general. Therefore, we could use any two integers or even use the same examples we used in the previous statement. Consequently, statement 2 is not sufficient.

Since both statements roughly present the same information, I would say that neither statement nor the combination of them will be sufficient.

E
Manager
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 141
Location: India
saurav: suman
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 147

### Show Tags

04 May 2014, 12:31
we can solve this question very easily.
consider few prime numbers 2, 3, ....
statement 1 says x is a multiple of prime numbers= so if we take 2 as no then its multiple are 2,4,6 ,8....
is 3 then 3,6,9,12....
So this this statement doesn't give a concrete ans.
Statement 2 says x is a product of two integers
as we know product of two integers are never prime except the number and 1.
so this statement doesn't give a concrete explanation.
Now on combining statement 1 and statement 2 we do not get any concrete answer so E is the correct ans.
_________________

You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come.

Give Kudos if you like my post

Re: M01#26   [#permalink] 04 May 2014, 12:31

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 34 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# M01#26

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderator: Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.