Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Ok, first I do not think 1 is a prime number, you could check it out in materials but as far as I know it is not a prime number.

Back to the question

1. Multiple of a prime number : so it could be divided by itself, 1 and the prime number that make it => it is not a prime number

2. Product of 2 integer: 1 is also an integer, so if the number = 1 * an integer, it could be prime ( 1* 2 or 1*3) or could not an integer( 1*6) => stmt 2 not suff

1) x is a multiple of a prime number 2)x is a product of two integers

1 is not suff - x is multiple of prime number so x could be 3,6,9.... Now when x=3 x is prime else not. 2 is not suff - x could be product of any integers i.e. 2 and 3.

1+2 is also not suff - if x=3, x is product of two integers 1 and 3 but when x = 6, x is product of two integers 2 and 3. So still we do not know the exact value of x. Hence E is correct. _________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

I don't see how B is suff - as X could be a product of 2 and 3 = 6 which is not a prime.

Not suff

Thats 3 integers. if x is a multiple of 2 integers, then x must be a prime.

Suppose: x = 2. it is a multiple of 1 and 2 i.e 2 integers. x = 3. it is a multiple of 1 and 3 i.e. 2 integers. x = 4. it is a multiple of 1, 2 and 4 i.e. 3 integers. x = 5. it is a multiple of 1 and 5 i.e. 2integers. x = 6. it is a multiple of 1, 2, 3 and 6 i.e. 4 integers.

x = 10. it is not a multiple of 2 and 5 rather its a multiple of 1, 2, 5, and 10.

Now I realize x could be -2. If so, x is a multi of either -2 and 1 or -1 and 2. If x = -2, x is not a prime.

So I think it should be C. From 1 and 2, x is a product of a prime and it is a product of 2 integers. In that case, x is a prime as it is multiple of a prime and 1.. _________________

Statement (1) says that x is a multiple of a prime number. Well, that immediately tells us that x is not a prime number because we can factor the a multiple. So now choices B, C, and E are eliminated.

Statement (2) says that x is a product of two integers. Well, we could look at the case of 2 * 3 = 6 but more importantly there is the case of 1 * any prime number. With the case of the 1 * prime number, choice D is eliminated.

Statement (1) says that x is a multiple of a prime number. Well, that immediately tells us that x is not a prime number because we can factor the a multiple. So now choices B, C, and E are eliminated.

Statement (2) says that x is a product of two integers. Well, we could look at the case of 2 * 3 = 6 but more importantly there is the case of 1 * any prime number. With the case of the 1 * prime number, choice D is eliminated.

Answer is A.

As far as I know, the general rule is that a number is a multiple of itself.

so 7*1 = 7 which is the first multiple of 7.

If one were to keep this rule in mind, then statement (1) would prove insufficient.

Thus, IMO, the correct answer is E. _________________

Click below to check out some great tips and tricks to help you deal with problems on Remainders! http://gmatclub.com/forum/compilation-of-tips-and-tricks-to-deal-with-remainders-86714.html#p651942

Word Problems Made Easy! 1) Translating the English to Math : http://gmatclub.com/forum/word-problems-made-easy-87346.html 2) 'Work' Problems Made Easy : http://gmatclub.com/forum/work-word-problems-made-easy-87357.html 3) 'Distance/Speed/Time' Word Problems Made Easy : http://gmatclub.com/forum/distance-speed-time-word-problems-made-easy-87481.html

(1) Insufficient 2 * 3 = 6 – not a prime 1 * 3 = 3 – a prime (2) Insufficient 2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime 1*3 = 3 – a prime (1) and (2) 2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime 1*3 = 3 – a prime Thus, insufficient E

1) x is a multiple of a prime number 2)x is a product of two integers

The question is unclear particularly statement 1. I am assuming x could be a multiple of itself or something else.

1: x could be that prime number or a multiple of a prime number.

If x is a multiple of only itself and 1, it is a prime. If x is a multiple of integers other than 1 and itself, x is not a prime..

not suff...

2: x is a prime if x is a product of 2 integers i.e x and 1. suff.

B.

I don't agree on the the answer

Statement 2. Why don't we consider product of 2 integers as ANY Integer? ( the statement doesn't specify whether the integers are prime or not prime, for example: X can be a product of 1*2 ( then yes prime) but X can be a product of 2*3 ( thus not prime)

and statement 1 is enough as if X is multiple of prime numbers ( 2, 3, 5, ...) thus X is not prime because it will include 1* PRIME1*PRIME2 and thus has more than 2 factors!!!!

(1) Insufficient 2 * 3 = 6 – not a prime 1 * 3 = 3 – a prime (2) Insufficient 2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime 1*3 = 3 – a prime (1) and (2) 2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime 1*3 = 3 – a prime Thus, insufficient E

I have a question?!!! the statement 1 says- x is a multiple of prime numbers!!!! 1- is not a prime number , it is a FACTOR of prime number. the smalles prime number is 2 thus the combination of 1*3 will not hold true!

(1) Insufficient 2 * 3 = 6 – not a prime 1 * 3 = 3 – a prime (2) Insufficient 2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime 1*3 = 3 – a prime (1) and (2) 2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime 1*3 = 3 – a prime Thus, insufficient E

I have a question?!!! the statement 1 says- x is a multiple of prime numbers!!!! 1- is not a prime number , it is a FACTOR of prime number. the smalles prime number is 2 thus the combination of 1*3 will not hold true!

Please discuss!

Consider the below question from the same test where it;s clearly stated that 1- is not a prime number!

Is the product of x and y a prime number?

1. x^2 = 1 2. y is positive and prime; x is positive but not prime _________________

(1) Insufficient 2 * 3 = 6 – not a prime 1 * 3 = 3 – a prime (2) Insufficient 2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime 1*3 = 3 – a prime (1) and (2) 2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime 1*3 = 3 – a prime Thus, insufficient E

I have a question?!!! the statement 1 says- x is a multiple of prime numbers!!!! 1- is not a prime number , it is a FACTOR of prime number. the smalles prime number is 2 thus the combination of 1*3 will not hold true!

Please discuss!

Statement 1 says that "x is a multiple of a prime number." This is different from what you have quoted "x is a multiple of prime numbers"

Statement #1: x is a multiple of a prime number.

Consider Prime number 3. First multiple of 3 = 3 Second multiple of 3 = 6 Third multiple of 3 = 9,etc....

The statement says that: x is a multiple of a prime number. But now we don't know which multiple they are talking about! First? Second? Third?

If it is the first multiple, then x is a prime number. If it a the 2nd,3rd, etc, multiple, then no, x is not a prime number.

I think the best response to the question is option E. (1) x is a multiple of a prime no: 2 = 2x1; 6=2x3...Insuff (2) x is a product of two intgs: Again, 2=2x1; also 6 = 2x3 (two integers) so, Insufficient Considering (1) and (2): 2 = 2x1 is a multiple of a prime no & product of 2 integers...YES, x is prime -2 = -1 x 2: multiple of a prime(2) & product of 2 integers (2 & -1)...NO, x is not prime 6 = 2x3 is equally a multiple of a prime no and product of 2 integers..NO, x is not prime Therefore, (1) and (2) combined is out.

Option E seems the best. _________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

This means that x is a multiple of a prime. The primes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11. So any multiples of these numbers are NOT prime. Therefore we know X is definately NOT PRIME.

How can a number be considered a multiple of itself ? i.e. 3 is a multiple of 3, 5 is a multple of 5 etc...

This means that x is a multiple of a prime. The primes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11. So any multiples of these numbers are NOT prime. Therefore we know X is definately NOT PRIME.

How can a number be considered a multiple of itself ? i.e. 3 is a multiple of 3, 5 is a multple of 5 etc...

On the GMAT when we are told that \(a\) is divisible by \(b\) (or which is the same: "\(a\) is multiple of \(b\)", or "\(b\) is a factor of \(a\)"), we can say that: 1. \(a\) is an integer; 2. \(b\) is an integer; 3. \(\frac{a}{b}=integer\).

So "\(a\) is multiple of \(b\)" means that \(\frac{a}{b}=integer\) --> the least positive multiple of an integer \(b\) is \(b\) itself as \(\frac{b}{b}=integer\): 3 is a multiple of 3, 5 is a multiple of 5, ... (it's the same as the greatest factor of a positive integer is this integer itself.)

Catch here is to know that every prime number is a multiple of a prime number, that is the same number. 3 is a prime number and it is a multiple of 3 as 3*1=3.

Very good trap question. _________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

This means that x is a multiple of a prime. The primes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11. So any multiples of these numbers are NOT prime. Therefore we know X is definately NOT PRIME.

How can a number be considered a multiple of itself ? i.e. 3 is a multiple of 3, 5 is a multple of 5 etc...

As per definition of a "multiple", any number that allows any other number divide it completely (ie leaving zero as a remainder) is a multiple of that other number. 3, when divided by 3, leaves a remainder of 0, hence 3 is a multiple of 3. This applies to all numbers.

Additional info: 0 is also a multiple of all numbers as 0 when divided by any other number yields a remainder of 0. This is an important number property frequently tested on the GMAT. _________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html