|
Author |
Message |
|
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 889
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
89
[0], given: 7
|
Question Stats:
50% (01:29) correct
50% (00:23) wrong based on 134 sessions
If x is an integer, is x a prime number? 1. x is a multiple of a prime number 2. x is a product of two integers Source: GMAT Club Tests - hardest GMAT questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2528
Followers: 41
Kudos [?]:
364
[0], given: 19
|
botirvoy wrote: If x is an integer, is x a prime number?
1) x is a multiple of a prime number
2)x is a product of two integers The question is unclear particularly statement 1. I am assuming x could be a multiple of itself or something else. 1: x could be that prime number or a multiple of a prime number. If x is a multiple of only itself and 1, it is a prime. If x is a multiple of integers other than 1 and itself, x is not a prime.. not suff... 2: x is a prime if x is a product of 2 integers i.e x and 1. suff. B.
_________________
Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Ok, first I do not think 1 is a prime number, you could check it out in materials but as far as I know it is not a prime number.
Back to the question
1. Multiple of a prime number : so it could be divided by itself, 1 and the prime number that make it => it is not a prime number
2. Product of 2 integer: 1 is also an integer, so if the number = 1 * an integer, it could be prime ( 1* 2 or 1*3) or could not an integer( 1*6) => stmt 2 not suff
My answer A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 656
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
106
[3] , given: 6
|
3
This post received
KUDOS
If x is an integer, is x a prime number? 1) x is a multiple of a prime number 2)x is a product of two integers 1 is not suff - x is multiple of prime number so x could be 3,6,9.... Now when x=3 x is prime else not. 2 is not suff - x could be product of any integers i.e. 2 and 3. 1+2 is also not suff - if x=3, x is product of two integers 1 and 3 but when x = 6, x is product of two integers 2 and 3. So still we do not know the exact value of x. Hence E is correct.
_________________
If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2528
Followers: 41
Kudos [?]:
364
[0], given: 19
|
tzvister wrote: I don't see how B is suff - as X could be a product of 2 and 3 = 6 which is not a prime.
Not suff Thats 3 integers. if x is a multiple of 2 integers, then x must be a prime. Suppose: x = 2. it is a multiple of 1 and 2 i.e 2 integers. x = 3. it is a multiple of 1 and 3 i.e. 2 integers. x = 4. it is a multiple of 1, 2 and 4 i.e. 3 integers. x = 5. it is a multiple of 1 and 5 i.e. 2integers. x = 6. it is a multiple of 1, 2, 3 and 6 i.e. 4 integers. x = 10. it is not a multiple of 2 and 5 rather its a multiple of 1, 2, 5, and 10. Now I realize x could be -2. If so, x is a multi of either -2 and 1 or -1 and 2. If x = -2, x is not a prime. So I think it should be C. From 1 and 2, x is a product of a prime and it is a product of 2 integers. In that case, x is a prime as it is multiple of a prime and 1..
_________________
Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
GT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 1
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Can we revisit this one?
Statement (1) says that x is a multiple of a prime number. Well, that immediately tells us that x is not a prime number because we can factor the a multiple. So now choices B, C, and E are eliminated.
Statement (2) says that x is a product of two integers. Well, we could look at the case of 2 * 3 = 6 but more importantly there is the case of 1 * any prime number. With the case of the 1 * prime number, choice D is eliminated.
Answer is A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 212
Followers: 49
Kudos [?]:
419
[0], given: 18
|
Paris92978 wrote: Can we revisit this one?
Statement (1) says that x is a multiple of a prime number. Well, that immediately tells us that x is not a prime number because we can factor the a multiple. So now choices B, C, and E are eliminated.
Statement (2) says that x is a product of two integers. Well, we could look at the case of 2 * 3 = 6 but more importantly there is the case of 1 * any prime number. With the case of the 1 * prime number, choice D is eliminated.
Answer is A. As far as I know, the general rule is that a number is a multiple of itself. so 7*1 = 7 which is the first multiple of 7. If one were to keep this rule in mind, then statement (1) would prove insufficient. Thus, IMO, the correct answer is E.
_________________
Click below to check out some great tips and tricks to help you deal with problems on Remainders!
compilation-of-tips-and-tricks-to-deal-with-remainders-86714.html#p651942
Word Problems Made Easy!
1) Translating the English to Math : word-problems-made-easy-87346.html
2) 'Work' Problems Made Easy : work-word-problems-made-easy-87357.html
3) 'Distance/Speed/Time' Word Problems Made Easy : distance-speed-time-word-problems-made-easy-87481.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 110
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
(1) Insufficient
2 * 3 = 6 – not a prime
1 * 3 = 3 – a prime
(2) Insufficient
2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime
1*3 = 3 – a prime
(1) and (2)
2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime
1*3 = 3 – a prime
Thus, insufficient E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 16
Location: UK
Schools: HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL ONLY
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
GMAT TIGER wrote: botirvoy wrote: If x is an integer, is x a prime number?
1) x is a multiple of a prime number
2)x is a product of two integers The question is unclear particularly statement 1. I am assuming x could be a multiple of itself or something else. 1: x could be that prime number or a multiple of a prime number. If x is a multiple of only itself and 1, it is a prime. If x is a multiple of integers other than 1 and itself, x is not a prime.. not suff... 2: x is a prime if x is a product of 2 integers i.e x and 1. suff. B. I don't agree on the the answer Statement 2. Why don't we consider product of 2 integers as ANY Integer? ( the statement doesn't specify whether the integers are prime or not prime, for example: X can be a product of 1*2 ( then yes prime) but X can be a product of 2*3 ( thus not prime) and statement 1 is enough as if X is multiple of prime numbers ( 2, 3, 5, ...) thus X is not prime because it will include 1* PRIME1*PRIME2 and thus has more than 2 factors!!!! Thus A is the answer!
_________________
TimurGMAT CRASHER
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 16
Location: UK
Schools: HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL ONLY
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Prometoh wrote: (1) Insufficient
2 * 3 = 6 – not a prime
1 * 3 = 3 – a prime
(2) Insufficient
2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime
1*3 = 3 – a prime
(1) and (2)
2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime
1*3 = 3 – a prime
Thus, insufficient E I have a question?!!! the statement 1 says- x is a multiple of prime numbers!!!! 1- is not a prime number , it is a FACTOR of prime number. the smalles prime number is 2 thus the combination of 1*3 will not hold true! Please discuss!
_________________
TimurGMAT CRASHER
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 16
Location: UK
Schools: HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL ONLY
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
TIMURgmat wrote: Prometoh wrote: (1) Insufficient
2 * 3 = 6 – not a prime
1 * 3 = 3 – a prime
(2) Insufficient
2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime
1*3 = 3 – a prime
(1) and (2)
2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime
1*3 = 3 – a prime
Thus, insufficient E I have a question?!!! the statement 1 says- x is a multiple of prime numbers!!!! 1- is not a prime number , it is a FACTOR of prime number. the smalles prime number is 2 thus the combination of 1*3 will not hold true! Please discuss! Consider the below question from the same test where it;s clearly stated that 1- is not a prime number! Is the product of x and y a prime number? 1. x^2 = 1 2. y is positive and prime; x is positive but not prime
_________________
TimurGMAT CRASHER
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 150
Concentration: Strategy, Other
GMAT 1: Q V
GMAT 2: Q V
WE: Business Development (Consulting)
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 53
|
TIMURgmat wrote: Prometoh wrote: (1) Insufficient
2 * 3 = 6 – not a prime
1 * 3 = 3 – a prime
(2) Insufficient
2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime
1*3 = 3 – a prime
(1) and (2)
2*3*3 = 18 – not a prime
1*3 = 3 – a prime
Thus, insufficient E I have a question?!!! the statement 1 says- x is a multiple of prime numbers!!!!1- is not a prime number , it is a FACTOR of prime number. the smalles prime number is 2 thus the combination of 1*3 will not hold true! Please discuss! Statement 1 says that "x is a multiple of a prime number." This is different from what you have quoted "x is a multiple of prime numbers" Statement #1: x is a multiple of a prime number.Consider Prime number 3. First multiple of 3 = 3 Second multiple of 3 = 6 Third multiple of 3 = 9,etc.... The statement says that: x is a multiple of a prime number. But now we don't know which multiple they are talking about! First? Second? Third? If it is the first multiple, then x is a prime number. If it a the 2nd,3rd, etc, multiple, then no, x is not a prime number. Hence Statement 1 is insufficient. I hope this makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Location: Tampa ,FL
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 2
|
I think so It E
each the statements alone is not suff.
becoz 1 ) x is multiple of prime no .So if x is multiple of prime no 3.So the value of x is going to be 3,6,9,12,15 etc
Where 3 is a prime number and rests are not .So 1 is insuff
2) is absolutely insuff .Becoz two int can be any int.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 591
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 14
Kudos [?]:
142
[0], given: 20
|
I think the best response to the question is option E. (1) x is a multiple of a prime no: 2 = 2x1; 6=2x3...Insuff (2) x is a product of two intgs: Again, 2=2x1; also 6 = 2x3 (two integers) so, Insufficient Considering (1) and (2): 2 = 2x1 is a multiple of a prime no & product of 2 integers...YES, x is prime -2 = -1 x 2: multiple of a prime(2) & product of 2 integers (2 & -1)...NO, x is not prime 6 = 2x3 is equally a multiple of a prime no and product of 2 integers..NO, x is not prime Therefore, (1) and (2) combined is out. Option E seems the best.
_________________
KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Schools: UCLA, USC
WE 1: 3 Yr at leading SAAS company
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
If is an integer, is a prime number?
1. is a multiple of a prime number
2. is a product of two integers
St 1:
x is multiple of prime number (can be 7*1, or 2*3 or 5*6)
so not suff.
St 2:
x is product of two integers(7*1, or 2*3 or 2*5)
not suff.
in either case its not concluding to single value with or without combining both statements & thus its E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 54
Location: New York, NY
Schools: Columbia, Johnson, Tuck, Stern
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 2
|
1. x is a multiple of a prime number.
I don't understand why this answer can't be A.
This means that x is a multiple of a prime. The primes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11. So any multiples of these numbers are NOT prime. Therefore we know X is definately NOT PRIME.
How can a number be considered a multiple of itself ?
i.e. 3 is a multiple of 3, 5 is a multple of 5 etc...
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club team member
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 12093
Followers: 1875
Kudos [?]:
10094
[1] , given: 958
|
1
This post received
KUDOS
Wayxi wrote: 1. x is a multiple of a prime number.
I don't understand why this answer can't be A.
This means that x is a multiple of a prime. The primes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11. So any multiples of these numbers are NOT prime. Therefore we know X is definately NOT PRIME.
How can a number be considered a multiple of itself ?
i.e. 3 is a multiple of 3, 5 is a multple of 5 etc... On the GMAT when we are told that a is divisible by b (or which is the same: "a is multiple of b", or "b is a factor of a"), we can say that:1. a is an integer; 2. b is an integer; 3. \frac{a}{b}=integer. So " a is multiple of b" means that \frac{a}{b}=integer --> the least positive multiple of an integer b is b itself as \frac{b}{b}=integer: 3 is a multiple of 3, 5 is a multiple of 5, ... (it's the same as the greatest factor of a positive integer is this integer itself.) Hope it's clear.
_________________
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!
RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory; 7. Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets; 9. PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!! ,11 Mixed Questions NEW!!!, 12 Fresh Meat NEW!!!
DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!, 11 New DS set. NEW!!!
What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: ready to boMBArd
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 493
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 11
Kudos [?]:
34
[0], given: 68
|
Answer is E. Catch here is to know that every prime number is a multiple of a prime number, that is the same number. 3 is a prime number and it is a multiple of 3 as 3*1=3. Very good trap question.
_________________
My GMAT debrief: from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: ready to boMBArd
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 493
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 11
Kudos [?]:
34
[0], given: 68
|
Wayxi wrote: 1. x is a multiple of a prime number.
I don't understand why this answer can't be A.
This means that x is a multiple of a prime. The primes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11. So any multiples of these numbers are NOT prime. Therefore we know X is definately NOT PRIME.
How can a number be considered a multiple of itself ?
i.e. 3 is a multiple of 3, 5 is a multple of 5 etc... As per definition of a "multiple", any number that allows any other number divide it completely (ie leaving zero as a remainder) is a multiple of that other number. 3, when divided by 3, leaves a remainder of 0, hence 3 is a multiple of 3. This applies to all numbers. Additional info: 0 is also a multiple of all numbers as 0 when divided by any other number yields a remainder of 0. This is an important number property frequently tested on the GMAT.
_________________
My GMAT debrief: from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1719
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 26
Kudos [?]:
229
[0], given: 35
|
The answer is E : (1) 2 is a multiple of itself ( a prime #) (2) 2 is a multiple of 1 and 2
_________________
Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
close
