Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Mary and Joe are to throw three dice each. The score is the sum of points on all three dice. If Mary scores 10 in her attempt what is the probability that Joe will outscore Mary in his?
To outscore Mary, Joe has to score in the range of 11-18. The probability to score 3 is the same as the probability to score 18 (1-1-1 combination against 6-6-6, if 1-1-1 is on the tops of the dice the 6-6-6 is on the bottoms). By the same logic, the probability to score \(x\) is the same as the probability to score \(21 - x\) . Therefore, the probability to score in the range 11-18 equals the probability to score in the range of 3-10. As 3-18 covers all possible outcomes the probability to score in the range 11-18 is \(\frac{1}{2}\) or \(\frac{32}{64}\) The correct answer is B.
i understand the logic above. however I was trying to do it differently and am no getting the same solution. where am i going wrong this my logic:
the minimum grouping of numbers that need to appear on the dice is 3,3,4. There one dice must be 3,4,5,6 another must be 3,4,5,6 and one must be 4,5,6.
so you get (4)(4)(3)/((6)(6)(6))
where am i going wrong. I think my logic flow is right but I am missing something. therefore there is _________________
Here is the long way of doing it for those who are too stupid to realize the simplicity of the problem (i.e. me)
Total combinations are 6x6x6 = 216.
Now, p(eleven or more) = 1- p(10 or less)
Count the number of ways in which you can get 10 or less
If you roll a 6 the first time, (xyz = roll x, roll y, roll z) then if you roll 6,1, there are 3 ways to roll 10 or less (611,612,613) (notice the sum of xyz <= 10)
so 61..3 ways 62..2 ways 63..1 way Total = 6
51..4 ways 52..3 53..2 54..1 Total 10
41..5 424 433 442 451 Total 15
316 325 334 343 352 361 Total 21
216 226 235 244 253 262 Total 26
116 126 136 145 154 163 Total 30
Total = 108/216 = 1/2 1-1/2 = 1/2
For rolling 2 1st and 1st, the pattern isnt as obviously so you have to manually count them.
Here is the long way of doing it for those who are too stupid to realize the simplicity of the problem (i.e. me)
Total combinations are 6x6x6 = 216.
Now, p(eleven or more) = 1- p(10 or less)
Count the number of ways in which you can get 10 or less
If you roll a 6 the first time, (xyz = roll x, roll y, roll z) then if you roll 6,1, there are 3 ways to roll 10 or less (611,612,613) (notice the sum of xyz <= 10)
so 61..3 ways 62..2 ways 63..1 way Total = 6
51..4 ways 52..3 53..2 54..1 Total 10
41..5 424 433 442 451 Total 15
316 325 334 343 352 361 Total 21
216 226 235 244 253 262 Total 26
116 126 136 145 154 163 Total 30
Total = 108/216 = 1/2 1-1/2 = 1/2
For rolling 2 1st and 1st, the pattern isnt as obviously so you have to manually count them.
I suck
Total combinations are 6x6x6 = 216., incorrect! when the dice are threw, the sum of the points S=1+2+3 is the same as S=3+2+1 So the total combinations are less than 216. Haven't figured out the rest yet. _________________
The probability to score X is the same as the probability to score 21-X.
If X=3 (which is 1+1+1 and which is min value in our case) than the prob 21-X=18 (which is 6+6+6 and which is max in our case). If X=4, 21-X=17 and so on. Finally, If X=18 (6+6+6 and max), 21-X=3 (1+1+1 and min) We cannot take any other number: if we take 22-X, then 22-3=19 (but we have only 6+6+6=18!) by the same logic, 20-X=2 when X=18.
This question was posted in PS forum as well. Here is my solution for it:
Expected value of a roll of one die is 1/6(1+2+3+4+5+6)=3.5. Expected value of three dice is 3*3.5=10.5.
Mary scored 10, so the probability to have more then 10 (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18), or more then average, is the same as to have less than average=1/2.
P=1/2.
Think this approach is the easiest one. _________________
i don't think there is a need to list all the combinations.
with 3 dices, the possible range of score is from 3 (3 dices of one) to 18 (3 dices of six). so there's a any number between 3 and 18 has a probability of:
1/(18-3+1) = 1/16
if a person has to roll 11 or over to win, the probability will be
This question was posted in PS forum as well. Here is my solution for it:
Expected value of a roll of one die is 1/6(1+2+3+4+5+6)=3.5. Expected value of three dice is 3*3.5=10.5.
Mary scored 10, so the probability to have more then 10 (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18), or more then average, is the same as to have less than average=1/2.
P=1/2.
Think this approach is the easiest one.
I used a variation of this. The lowest sum is 3 (1+1+1), the highest is 18 (6+6+6). The mean of these is 10.5, meaning about half the digits sum should be above, half should be below. Roughly half should be greater than 10 then, so I just used elimination to see what what was close to half. This isn't a "clean" way to do it, but if you have two mins I think it's best to just guess and move on. _________________
If you liked my post, please consider thanking me with Kudos! I really appreciate it!
The easier approach for me is the following: Because they dice 3 times, and count the sum of it, there are 16 possible results (from 3 to 18). Mary scored 10. The question asks the probability to score HIGHER than Mary. From 3 to 10 there are 8 possible results, and from 11 to 18 there are another 8 possible results. It doesn't matter how many combination are there for every score. We can easily calculate anyways that there are a total of 216 (6x6x6) but that is irrelevant. We only need to know that scoring 3 and scoring 18 have the same number of combination, scoring 4 and 17 have the same number of combination again, etc. So, to score more than 10, there are 8 possible results, which means 50% of the possible results (and combination), or 1/2, or 4/8, or 10/20, or 30/60, or 6/12, or 32/64, or whatever you want that is equivalent to 1/2 (or whatever answer choice you find that is equivalent).
In these kind of questions, one has to remember that we are choosing distinct nos. i.e. 8 distinct totals out of 16 total probabilities. Hence it would be a complete waste of time to manually list down each possibility. The questions clearly asks to "calculate" the required outcome, not to "arrange" the required outcomes.
I solved it in < 30 secs. This is how I thought in my head.
Joe could win if 11-18, and loose if 3-10.
In other words, find number of ways x+y+z=A, such that A ={11, ... , 18}, and x,y,z={1, ... , 6}
Min(x+y+z)=1+1+1=3. Max(x+y+z)=6+6+6=18.
P(3)=P(18), where P=Probability or number of ways, please think whatever you like. I like to think in terms of probability. P(4)=P(17): why? one of the dices can take 2 values, while others constant. This is the key to understand the problem.
Extrapolate: This is the key to generalize the problem. P(5)=P(16) . . . P(10)=P(11)
=> P(3)+P(4)+....+P(10) = P(18)+P(17)+....+P(11) => P(3, 4, ... , 10) = P(18, 17, ... , 11) This is the key. After this think however you want to think. One of the ways:
i don't think there is a need to list all the combinations.
with 3 dices, the possible range of score is from 3 (3 dices of one) to 18 (3 dices of six). so there's a any number between 3 and 18 has a probability of:
1/(18-3+1) = 1/16
if a person has to roll 11 or over to win, the probability will be
Alternatively: all available scores is 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 the score can't be 1 or 2 because u have 3 dices
if mary rolled 10, to be higher than her, u can roll 11 and up 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
bold occurrences / all occurrences = 8/16
Oops. You got the answer by fluke You made BIG mistake in your assumption (even you 2nd solution is INCORRECT! 8/16 is NOTHING!).... Be careful my friend. These are the careless mistakes that cost you bigtime.
P(3) is NOT equal to P(5). WHY?
Number of ways 3 can occur = {1,1,1} = 1 Probability of 3 occurring = 1/(6*6*6) = 1/216
Number of ways 4 can occur = {1,1,2}*3C1 = 3 Probability of 5 occurring = 3/(6*6*6) = 1/72
Number of ways 5 can occur = {1,1,3}*3C1 + {1,2,2}*3C2 = 6 Probability of 5 occurring = 6/(6*6*6) = 1/36
.....
The symmetry is across the 2 ends of the SUM and not across the entire set.
Please see my solution above to inculcate the right thought process!
The probability to score between 3 and 10 is the same to score between 11 and 18, which is 1/2 <=> 32/64.
The tramp is to loose your time with long operations...
Agreed, and that's what I also wrote too :p. But, I think it more important to understand the theory behind the solution - why P(3 ... 10) = P(18 ... 11). This is an easy question, but what if you were asked > 11 instead of > 10?
Answer = P(18, .... , 11) - P(11) = 1/2 - P(11) = 1/2 - P(see my next post)
Last edited by abhicoolmax on 26 Aug 2011, 14:27, edited 1 time in total.
the probability of score between 3 and 11 is 9/16, the probability of score between 12 and 18 is 7/16. Correct?
Edit: I like your way, but to me this is faster, once you see the tramp
Sorry, that's WRONG
P(12 ... 18) = P(11 ... 18) - P (11) = 1/2 - [P(1,5,5)*3C1*2C2 + P(2,4,5)*3C1*2C1*1C1 + P(2,3,6)*3C1*2C1*1C1 + ................ ) = Definitely NOT equal to 7/16 :D
Please see my original 2 posts on why? Make sure you understand! You guys are making WRONG ASSUMPTION. Symmetry is across the 2 ends of the SUM, and NOT across the entire set.