Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

I also interpreted the question stem the same way and chose D. Very surprised that GMATTIGER's position is the correct one. Any expert would like to comment on this issue?

As per request, I am giving my position on this question:

Actually, no. There is no ambiguity here. The OE is correct.

9^1 + (99)^2 + (999)^3 + ... + (10^n - 1)^n only implies that n is 1 or any other positive integer. It is implied that the first term of the series is 9^1. If there is a second term, it will be (99)^2 and so on... Whenever we have such a series, we always try to put n = 1 to figure out the sum in the simplest case. Then we put n = 2 to figure out the sum in that case. This gives us some idea of where we are going. It only shows you what the series looks like in the general case. _________________

OE: Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. (2 is prime and even, 3 is prime and odd).

Thoughts?

If the question stem doesnot say n>3 explicitly, you cannot assume that n>3 just because the first 3 terms are stated the way as above in the question. Then

1. n is even is suff as n is even only. 2. n is prime is not suff as n could be odd or even.

OE: Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. (2 is prime and even, 3 is prime and odd).

Thoughts?

If the question stem doesnot say n>3 explicitly, you cannot assume that n>3 just because the first 3 terms are stated the way as above in the question. Then

1. n is even is suff as n is even only. 2. n is prime is not suff as n could be odd or even.

That only A is suff.

Thanks. Have to be careful about these interpretations. Next test (m11 16), another question which had me baffled (similar interpretation thing):

Which of the following represents the range for all X which satisfy |1 - X| \lt 1 ?

* (-1, 1) * (-1, 2) * (0, 1) * (0, 2) * (1, 2)

I went the same way as the solution goes and reached 0<X<2. Now looking at the options, (0,2) looks as if including 0 and 2 which is not correct... but then there is no other option

Re: m10 #36 isn't ambiguous? [#permalink]
15 Nov 2009, 10:33

gmattokyo wrote:

Next test (m11 16), another question which had me baffled (similar interpretation thing):

Which of the following represents the range for all X which satisfy |1 - X| \lt 1 ?

* (-1, 1) * (-1, 2) * (0, 1) * (0, 2) * (1, 2)

I went the same way as the solution goes and reached 0<X<2. Now looking at the options, (0,2) looks as if including 0 and 2 which is not correct... but then there is no other option

Thats the value: 0< X < 2.

You are correct. The answer choices look strange however none other than (0, 2) are near to the possible range. If range means excluding, (0, 2) is fine but does range defined that way? Probably not. _________________

OE: Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. (2 is prime and even, 3 is prime and odd).

Thoughts?

I also interpreted the question stem the same way and chose D. Very surprised that GMATTIGER's position is the correct one. Any expert would like to comment on this issue?

Re: m10 #36 isn't ambiguous? [#permalink]
04 Oct 2011, 03:27

my pick is D.

S1: all 9 powers to even results 1 as the unit digit, and odd power with 9. So, unit digit of the sum is "0". Sufficient

S2: Only prime with even is 2. As the question already has powers more than 2, then "n" has to odd. So, the unit digit of sum has to be "9". Sufficient

But, both the answers contradict. Still i will go with D, before seeing others explanations.