Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Together with the information from the stem S1 completely defines the series. Thus, S1 is sufficient to answer the question.

S2: A(1) - A(2) = 5 = A(1) - \frac{A(1)}{2} from where A(1) = 10 . S2 is also sufficient to answer the question.

2) Alternative Explanation from GMAT Club member laxieqv:

Statement 1: A(2)= 5 --> A(1) = 10 , A(3) = \frac{5}{3} , A(4)= \frac{5}{12} ( all are according to the provided formula) . Notice that the bigger n is, the smaller A(n) is. For n>=4, A(n) <= \frac{5}{12} < \frac{1}{2} ---> there are only A(1), A(2), A(3) which are bigger than 1/2 ---> this statement is sufficient.

Statement 2: A(1)- A(2)= 5 , together with A(2)= \frac{A(1)}{2} ---> A (1) =10 and A(2)= 5 ---> come back to statement 1 ---> also sufficient.

That's why it's D. The correct answer is D.

I don't understand in dealing with Statement 2 why A(2) is not set equal to 0. 1-1 is 0 so A(1) should be equal to 0 while A(2) is equal to A1/2.

You might be confused with the series markup. A(n) signifies a series member. Thus, A(1) is the first term of the series and so forth. We need to know at least one one term of this series to be able to find the rest. Do you think the question stem would look better like this:

Series A(n) is such that A_n = \frac{A_{n-1}}{n} . How many elements of the series are greater than \frac{1}{2}?

option is D in Ds, the questions have yes/no solution, we dont have to really find the exact answer just make sure whether we can get the answer or no. by solving both the statement individually we will e able to find the elements of the series. once the series elements are known the question can be easily answered. hence option D

Wouldn' this question make more sense if they give the range values for 'n' say 'n' is a natural no. that varies from 1 to infinity.

I found some inconsistencies while solving for lower values of 'n' such as 0 and 1/2 Eg: if A(1) = 10 then A(1) = A(0) / 1 and hence A(0) is also 10 . But solving for A(0) : A(0) = A(-1) / 0 which is not a valid number and hence A(0) cannot be 10 . You get what I am saying . If this a wrong way to deal with series questions or should the question be more precise.

Never-mind... I looked over silasaaa2's post in more detail. Small mistake in the post was confusing me but after going over the logic I caught it and it makes sense now. THANK YOU!!!

------------ Sorry I am still not understanding how S2 gives us 10 for A(1). When I do the math I get A(0)/1 and this is confusing me. Can someone walk through the steps with greater detail?

Of course knowing what we learned in S1 I see how it is "correct" and how S2 supports what we have already seen in S1, but how we get there independently is where my issue lies.

Thank you

Last edited by Reighngold on 02 Feb 2012, 05:48, edited 1 time in total.

not sure how you implement A(3) to get 5/3 and A(4) to get 5/12. can someone please walk me through it. thanks in advance

This threw me for a loop as well when I first saw it here is how I figured it out.

In both S1 and S2 we have already established that A(2) = 5

So when we substitute n with 3 we get: A(3)=A(3-1)/3 A(3)=A(2)/3

Since we know that A(2) = 5 we can substitute 5 and we get: A(3)=5/3

Following the same pattern you then get: A(4)=A(4-1)/4 A(4)=A(3)/4 A(4)=5/3/4 <-- again substituting the pre derived value for A(3) A(4)=5/3*1/4 A(4)=5/12

Can somebody will explain the theory behind this question? I didn't understand the question. What exactly it wants to ask??

Series A(n) is such that A(n) = \frac{A(n-1)}{n} . How many elements of the series are bigger than 1/2?

Probably te question should have been worded in a different manner:

The sequence A_1, A_2, ... is defined such that A_{n+1}=\frac{A_{n}}{n+1} for all n>1. How many terms of the sequence is greater than 1/2?(Note that it's the same exact formula just written in different manner)

Basically we have a sequence of numbers which is defined with some formula. For example: A_{2}=\frac{A_{1}}{1+1}, A_{3}=\frac{A_{2}}{2+1}, A_{4}=\frac{A_{3}}{3+1}, ... The question asks: how many numbers from the sequence is greater than 1/2. Notice that if we knew ANY term of the sequence we would be able to get all the other terms/numbers and thus answer the question.

(1) A_2=5. As discussed above this statement is sufficient as we can write down all the terms. For example: A_{2}=\frac{A_{1}}{1+1}=5 --> A_1=10. A_{3}=\frac{A_{2}}{2+1}=\frac{5}{3}, and so on.

(2) A_1-A_2=5 --> A_1-\frac{A_{1}}{1+1}=5 --> we can solve for A_1 and thus will have the same case of knowing one term. Sufficient.

Question statement 2 was real tricky. I knew that statement 1 is sufficient once I found out A1=10

but for statement 2, I decided that A(1) is = to 0 since the numerator is being multiplied by 0.

Thus I got 0-A(2)=5 therefore -A(2)=5 which got me A=-10. I thus picked A but after reading this thread and seeing how everyone got for statement 2, A=10, I just thought it was tricky the way the other people solved it.

Where did I go wrong in my thought process for statement 2?

Question statement 2 was real tricky. I knew that statement 1 is sufficient once I found out A1=10

but for statement 2, I decided that A(1) is = to 0 since the numerator is being multiplied by 0.

Thus I got 0-A(2)=5 therefore -A(2)=5 which got me A=-10. I thus picked A but after reading this thread and seeing how everyone got for statement 2, A=10, I just thought it was tricky the way the other people solved it.

Where did I go wrong in my thought process for statement 2?

I think you multiplied by n-1 when you got 0 for A1, but n-1 is a subscript not a multiple. Refer to my post above for proper version of this question with a solution.

Question statement 2 was real tricky. I knew that statement 1 is sufficient once I found out A1=10

but for statement 2, I decided that A(1) is = to 0 since the numerator is being multiplied by 0.

Thus I got 0-A(2)=5 therefore -A(2)=5 which got me A=-10. I thus picked A but after reading this thread and seeing how everyone got for statement 2, A=10, I just thought it was tricky the way the other people solved it.

Where did I go wrong in my thought process for statement 2?

I think you multiplied by n-1 when you got 0 for A1, but n-1 is a subscript not a multiple. Refer to my post above for proper version of this question with a solution.

Hope it helps.

Ahhh I see now. Thanks. It does sorta look like a multiple with (n-1) being multiplied by A. I now see that it is a subscript. Thanks - Chris W.

Thanks Bunuel, I understood that particular reply, but fundamentaly i did not get how has the reply reworded A (n+1)=An/n+1, from the real equation given in the question

Thanks Bunuel, I understood that particular reply, but fundamentaly i did not get how has the reply reworded A (n+1)=An/n+1, from the real equation given in the question

First of all, if you look at the formula given in the initial post and the one given in mine, you'll notice that they're basically the same: just replaced n with n+1. Next, I didn't reworded the question, I changed it so that it would be more GMAT type.