m15 # 27 : Retired Discussions [Locked]
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 16:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# m15 # 27

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2009, 08:15
Set S is composed of consecutive multiples of 3. Set T is composed of consecutive multiples of 6. If each set contains more than one element, is the median of set S larger than the median of set T?

s1) The least element in either set is 6.
s2) Set T contains twice as many elements as set S.
(C) 2008 GMAT Club - m15#27

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but Statement (2) ALONE is not sufficient
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but Statement (1) ALONE is not sufficient
BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. If set contains many more elements than set , its median can be greater than that of set .

Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. We don't know how the sets are positioned against each other.

Statements (1) and (2) combined are sufficient. The answer is "no".

my question is...cant this still be proved ineffective?
it says consecutive multiples of 3 or 6, but you cannot just assume they start with small elements
to TEST C:
eg. S= (3,6,9,12,15,18) median = 10.5, T = (6,12,18) median = 12
median S < median T = therefore NO

BUT there is no restriction on where these consecutive multiples start:
what if S = (102,105,108, 111, 114, 117) median = 109.5 , T = (6, 12, 18) median = 12

so shouldnt the answer be E?

am i missing something here? thanks in advance..

Last edited by viperm5 on 08 Aug 2009, 15:18, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 169
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2009, 08:24
Please post the exact question i.e. mention the set names in the following statements:
"is the median of set larger than the median of set"
"Set contains twice as many elements as set "
Intern
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2009, 15:18
Aleehsgonji wrote:
Please post the exact question i.e. mention the set names in the following statements:
"is the median of set larger than the median of set"
"Set contains twice as many elements as set "

ooops sorry didnt realize i missed those. thanks!! fixed.
Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 169
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2009, 18:53
Each statement alone is insufficient.
Combining 1 and 2
From 2, number of elements in T is twice as the number of elements in S.
S = {6,9,12}
T = {6,12,18,24, 30,36}
Median of S = 9
Median of T = 21
1 and 2 are sufficient. Answer is C.
Though median of S is less than median of T, we are able to arrive at this answer using both the statements.
In data sufficiency, we should not look for Yes or No answer but we should for arriving at the solution.
Intern
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 11:19
Aleehsgonji wrote:
Each statement alone is insufficient.
Combining 1 and 2
From 2, number of elements in T is twice as the number of elements in S.
S = {6,9,12}
T = {6,12,18,24, 30,36}
Median of S = 9
Median of T = 21
1 and 2 are sufficient. Answer is C.
Though median of S is less than median of T, we are able to arrive at this answer using both the statements.
In data sufficiency, we should not look for Yes or No answer but we should for arriving at the solution.

ahh makes sense now.
thanks for clarification!!
Re: m15 # 27   [#permalink] 09 Aug 2009, 11:19
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
M15 Q 27 - DS 4 19 Jul 2009, 23:07
DS:m 15 #29 1 20 Jun 2009, 10:59
4 m15,#10 18 28 Nov 2008, 01:10
13 M15#18 22 19 Nov 2008, 18:24
6 M15 #3 26 22 Oct 2008, 12:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# m15 # 27

Moderator: Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.