Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Statement 1 : Everybody knows that this is sufficient. Statement 2 : It says that the difference between the lengths of sides of the rectangle is smaller than 3,so that means l-b < 3..Also it has a fact that the diagonal of the rectangle is 10 (since radius of circle is 5).Now,considering these values (l^2 + b^2 = 100 and l-b<3),we have only one possibility when the diagonal can be of 10 units i.e. when we have sides 8 and 6.Hence,this statement is also sufficient to answer.

I am new on this forum and would like to know if the GMAT Club Tests were providing 'official' answers explanations. Having 10-15 posts to answer a question provides some interesting back and forth and sometimes multiple angles to solve it but it can unfortunately be confusing as well. Adding an 'official' explanation to the correct answer - maybe as a second show/ hide section - would in my opinion provide added value. Greg _________________

1. The ratio of the lengths of sides of the rectangle is 3:4:- This gives area of rectangle equal to 48 hence sufficient 2. The difference between the lengths of sides of the rectangle is smaller than 3: If a,b are the two sides then a:b=3:4 or a=3k,b=4k where k is any constant. Difference =4k-3k=k<3 hence k=0,1,2 k cannot be equal to 0,1 as if k=1 then a=3,b=4 which is not possible as diameter of circle=10. if k=2 then a=6,b=8 and area=48 hence sufficient.

Statement 1 : Everybody knows that this is sufficient. Statement 2 : It says that the difference between the lengths of sides of the rectangle is smaller than 3,so that means l-b < 3..Also it has a fact that the diagonal of the rectangle is 10 (since radius of circle is 5).Now,considering these values (l^2 + b^2 = 100 and l-b<3),we have only one possibility when the diagonal can be of 10 units i.e. when we have sides 8 and 6.Hence,this statement is also sufficient to answer.

Let me know what you guys think....

Statement (2) is not sufficient, see algebraic solutions on previous page or consider the following examples:

If a=8 and b=6 (a-b=2<3 and a^2+b^2=100) then area=ab=48 and the answer to the question "is area>48" is NO;

If a=b=\sqrt{50} (a-b=0<3 and a^2+b^2=100) then area=ab=50 and the answer to the question "is area>48" is YES. Note that in this case inscribed figure is square, which is a special type of rectangle.

Two different answers not sufficient.

Answer: A.

I think that the problem with your solution is that you assumed with no ground for it that the lengths of the sides of the rectangle are integers.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel....Can u please explain the solution..( both options A and B)... i am quite confused about this problem of how is A sufficient and how is B insufficient _________________

Regards, Harsha

Note: Give me kudos if my approach is right , else help me understand where i am missing.. I want to bell the GMAT Cat

So, we can rephrase the question as 75 (Approx 25pi) > xy> 48?

1) SUFFICIENT Let's try multiples of the ratio of 3:4 (3,4) -- FALSE (6,8) -- FALSE (9,12) --FALSE We can see that at any multiple the value the statement doesn't hold true.

2) INSUFFICIENT Given: x-y<3, we can find two values 1) where x-y<3 and xy is greater than 75 e.g. 9,10 2) where x-y<3 and xy is in between 75 (Approx 25pi) > xy> 48 , e.g. 8,8

S2: b - a < 3 Squaring both the sides of the inequality, gives: a^2 + b^2 - 2ab < 9 => 100 - 2ab < 9 Solving the inequality gives: ab > 45.5 Therefore, ab > 48 may or may not be true.

I need help- why does the inequality sign flip? Why don't we add 2ab and subtract 9 to both sides of 100 - 2ab + 2an -9 < 9 + 2ab -9 = 91 < 2AB, then divide by positive 2 = 45.5 < AB?

S2: b - a < 3 Squaring both the sides of the inequality, gives: a^2 + b^2 - 2ab < 9 => 100 - 2ab < 9 Solving the inequality gives: ab > 45.5 Therefore, ab > 48 may or may not be true.

I need help- why does the inequality sign flip? Why don't we add 2ab and subtract 9 to both sides of 100 - 2ab + 2an -9 < 9 + 2ab -9 = 91 < 2AB, then divide by positive 2 = 45.5 < AB?

S2: b - a < 3 Squaring both the sides of the inequality, gives: a^2 + b^2 - 2ab < 9 => 100 - 2ab < 9 Solving the inequality gives: ab > 45.5 Therefore, ab > 48 may or may not be true.

I need help- why does the inequality sign flip? Why don't we add 2ab and subtract 9 to both sides of 100 - 2ab + 2an -9 < 9 + 2ab -9 = 91 < 2AB, then divide by positive 2 = 45.5 < AB?

Wow. I guess your tests really are hard.. after 2 of them I went full retard. I was staring at this for an hour. After a good night's sleep, it's REALLY obvious, and I'm embarrassed.

In regards to question about flipping the sign on the inequality, the below is how I look at it:

Taking from inequality: 100 - 2ab < 9 Subtract 100 from both sides of inequality: 100 - 2ab < 9 - 100 => -2ab < -91

Divide 2 from both sides of inequality: (-2ab) / 2 < (-91) / 2 => -ab < -45.5

Now, this is where the flipping of the inequality sign comes into play. The rule is that when you change the arithmetic sign from negative to positive in an inequality, you should flip the sign of the inequality.

=> ab > 45.5

Hope this answers your question. Cheers!! Happy GMATing!!!

S2: b - a < 3 Squaring both the sides of the inequality, gives: a^2 + b^2 - 2ab < 9 => 100 - 2ab < 9 Solving the inequality gives: ab > 45.5 Therefore, ab > 48 may or may not be true.

Result: S2 is NOT sufficient to answer the question.

My answer is A.

Vshrivastava,

Even though I got this question correct, but I do like the way you prove the second statement insufficient. Thanks so much. _________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

I often find myself doing unecessary calculations in DS. In my opinion working on this is the best way to get more comfortable with the time. On this question, for statement 1, wouldn't it suffice to notice that there is only one possible rectangle with sides of ratio 2:3 that can fit inside a circle of radius 5? What I mean is everyone in this thread calculated that the area of this rectangle is 48 but isn't this unecessary? We basicaly don't really care if it's 48, more than 48 or less than 48.. Am I making a mistake somewhere? thank you

I've always believed that the DS problems are a lot about developing intuition on the sufficiency test for the given statements. One who can develop such intuition can sure gain on time; but one might give away on accuracy. For example, I'd be careful while evaluating sufficiency in problems involving inequalities and would perform necessary calculations before making up my mind on sufficiency. Hope this helps!!

The Official Explanation for Statement B says that - The difference between the lengths of sides of the rectangle is smaller than 3. Given that b−a<3. Square both sides: b2−2ab+a2<9. Now, since diagonal=102=a2+b2 then 100−2ab<9, soab>45.5. So we have that area=ab>45.5, hence the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient

My doubt is -Can we Square the given Inequality(b−a<3), since rule says that until and unless you are sure about both terms being positive you cannot square the Inequality. How can we be sure that the LHS or RHS is positive. Please explain.

Statement 1 : Everybody knows that this is sufficient. Statement 2 : It says that the difference between the lengths of sides of the rectangle is smaller than 3,so that means l-b < 3..Also it has a fact that the diagonal of the rectangle is 10 (since radius of circle is 5).Now,considering these values (l^2 + b^2 = 100 and l-b<3),we have only one possibility when the diagonal can be of 10 units i.e. when we have sides 8 and 6.Hence,this statement is also sufficient to answer.

Let me know what you guys think....

Statement (2) is not sufficient, see algebraic solutions on previous page or consider the following examples:

If a=8 and b=6 (a-b=2<3 and a^2+b^2=100) then area=ab=48 and the answer to the question "is area>48" is NO;

If a=b=\sqrt{50} (a-b=0<3 and a^2+b^2=100) then area=ab=50 and the answer to the question "is area>48" is YES. Note that in this case inscribed figure is square, which is a special type of rectangle.

Two different answers not sufficient.

Answer: A.

I think that the problem with your solution is that you assumed with no ground for it that the lengths of the sides of the rectangle are integers.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel, I understand the solution given in your other explanation. Thanks for the help. My question is on this first explination. How do we get a=b=\sqrt{50}? Is it simply because a^2+b^2=100...I think I figured it out as I was typing this, but is that correct? I was originally trying to draw a connection to the radius and the sides of the square (25+25...) Anyway.

Another approach for Option B: Rectangle with largest area is square. So if square were to be fit in the circle, the area would be 50 ((5\sqrt{2})^2). With 8 and 6 as the sides (as 10 is the radius), the area would be 48. The difference in lengths here is less than 2. If the difference were to increase (suppose 2.5), the area would be below 48. So according to this option, it can be above or below 48.

Bunuel.. There was one question in gmat club tests, I dont remember which question it was! In which it was mentioned that rectangle is inscribed in circle.. bt OE was , its not neccessary rectangle wud cross through radius of circle or it can touch any point of circle..

Thats y i chose E for this question. because i thought rectangle inscribed in circle mean it can touch any point of circle. _________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !