Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:03 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:03

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [12]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [5]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [5]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Mar 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 98
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Bunuel,

How come you included 2 in the set A? Should the set A start with 5 instead of 2?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [1]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
tstempni wrote:
Bunuel,

How come you included 2 in the set A? Should the set A start with 5 instead of 2?


0 is a multiple of every integer. Hence 0 + 2 = {a multiple of 3} + 2 = 2 = prime.

ZERO:

1. 0 is an integer.

2. 0 is an even integer. An even number is an integer that is "evenly divisible" by 2, i.e., divisible by 2 without a remainder and as zero is evenly divisible by 2 then it must be even.

3. 0 is neither positive nor negative integer (the only one of this kind).

4. 0 is divisible by EVERY integer.

Check more here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/tips-and-hint ... l#p1371030
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Mar 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 98
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Thanks!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2013
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Is there any easy way to tell if a fraction is a terminating decimal?
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 325
Own Kudos [?]: 195 [0]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE:Operations (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Sep 2016
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
I want to ask a question

if a subset includes more than one copy of a member of the original set. Then is it still considered a subset? for example A= 1,2,3 and if B =1.2,2. Would B be a subset of A?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
baithak wrote:
I want to ask a question

if a subset includes more than one copy of a member of the original set. Then is it still considered a subset? for example A= 1,2,3 and if B =1.2,2. Would B be a subset of A?


There are no two 2's in A, so no. A subset of a set can include only the elements of the initial sets.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 26 Nov 2012
Posts: 473
Own Kudos [?]: 493 [0]
Given Kudos: 46
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Hi Bunuel,

Set A consists of all distinct prime numbers which are 2 more than a multiple of 3. Can you please explain this bit clearly.

I can see the set as ( 2,5,11, etc) , here 3 and 7 are missing, but 7 is not a multiple of 3. Explain this point too.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
msk0657 wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

Set A consists of all distinct prime numbers which are 2 more than a multiple of 3. Can you please explain this bit clearly.

I can see the set as ( 2,5,11, etc) , here 3 and 7 are missing, but 7 is not a multiple of 3. Explain this point too.


Set A consists of all distinct prime numbers which are 2 more than a multiple of 3, so primes which are 2 more than a multiple of 3, so {a multiple of 3} + 2 = prime: {2, 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 41, ...}

How does 3 or 7 satisfy {a multiple of 3} + 2 = prime?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2017
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Hi Bunuel,

I'm super confused as to how statement 2 works...the examples given in statement 2: (4,8) and (2,5) seem to be subsets of set A, yet (4,8) is said to be NO, and (2,5) is said to be YES. Can you please help me on this point? thanks.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [1]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
ttaiwo wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

I'm super confused as to how statement 2 works...the examples given in statement 2: (4,8) and (2,5) seem to be subsets of set A, yet (4,8) is said to be NO, and (2,5) is said to be YES. Can you please help me on this point? thanks.


Set A = {2, 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 41, ...} (distinct prime numbers which are 2 more than a multiple of 3).

The question asks whether set B is a subset of set A.

If from (2) set B is {4, 8}, then the answer is NO: {4, 8} is NOT a subset of {2, 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 41, ...}
If from (2) set B is {2, 5}, then the answer is YES: {2, 5} IS a subset of {2, 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 41, ...}


Hope it's clear.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Posts: 586
Own Kudos [?]: 418 [0]
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
chetan2u ScottTargetTestPrep AjiteshArun VeritasKarishma

Multiple of a number in my opinion does not take into account 0.

In general, if someone asks me , write down the multiples of 3.

I will write 3,6,9,12,15.......so on.

Do you think we should really take 0*3=0 as a case here??
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14822
Own Kudos [?]: 64916 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
warrior1991 wrote:
chetan2u ScottTargetTestPrep AjiteshArun VeritasKarishma

Multiple of a number in my opinion does not take into account 0.

In general, if someone asks me , write down the multiples of 3.

I will write 3,6,9,12,15.......so on.

Do you think we should really take 0*3=0 as a case here??


Multiples can be negative, 0 or positive. Factors are positive only.
0 is a multiple of all numbers. So 0 is a multiple of 3 too.
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18761
Own Kudos [?]: 22052 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
warrior1991 wrote:
chetan2u ScottTargetTestPrep AjiteshArun VeritasKarishma

Multiple of a number in my opinion does not take into account 0.

In general, if someone asks me , write down the multiples of 3.

I will write 3,6,9,12,15.......so on.

Do you think we should really take 0*3=0 as a case here??

Response:

As a matter of fact, 0 is a multiple of every integer, including itself.

An integer n is a multiple of an integer m if we can express n as n = m*k where k is an integer. So, in order to determine whether 0 is a multiple of 3, we should ask the following question: “Can we find an integer k such that 0 = 3*k?”. The answer is yes; if we let k = 0, we see that the equality holds. That’s why 0 is a multiple of 3 (and any other integer).
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2020
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 278
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V31
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Thank team for the good question. But I am of the opinion the answer is C - since Set (1,10) is not a subset to Set A . Hence, from statement 1 + 2 , only one set remains i.e (2,5)

Sets from Statement 1 - (1,10),(2,5)
Sets from Statement 2 - (2,5) (Multiples of 10)... infinite
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
RRJ12 wrote:
Thank team for the good question. But I am of the opinion the answer is C - since Set (1,10) is not a subset to Set A . Hence, from statement 1 + 2 , only one set remains i.e (2,5)

Sets from Statement 1 - (1,10),(2,5)
Sets from Statement 2 - (2,5) (Multiples of 10)... infinite


The question asks: is set B a subset of set A? If set B = {1, 10}, then the answer to the question is NO but if set B = {2, 5}, then the answer to the question is YES.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618966 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
I have edited the question and the solution by adding more details to enhance its clarity. I hope it is now easier to understand.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: M30-06 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92914 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne