Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. Machines B [#permalink]
25 Nov 2010, 07:25

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (03:14) correct
18% (02:14) wrong based on 348 sessions

Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. Machines B and C working together but independently can process the same number of envelopes in 2.5 hours. If Machines A and C working together but independently process 3000 envelopes in 1 hour, then how many hours would it take Machine B to process 12000 envelopes.

Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. MAchines B and C working together but independently can process the same number of envelopes in 2.5 hours. If Machines A and C working together but independently process 3000 envelopes in 1 hour, then how many hours would it take Machine B to process 12000 envelopes.

2 3 4 6 8 - Correct Answer

I got this far:

Machine C = 6 hours for 6000 envelopes

Then (1/T) = (1/b) +(1/c)

1/2.5 = (1/b) + (1/6) b= (30/7) for 6000 envelopes or (60/7) for 12000 envelopes.

Why isnt the answer coming up to exactly 8?

I think you did everything right.

Let the time needed for A, B and C working individually to process 6,000 envelopes be a, b and c respectively.

Now, as "A can process 6,000 envelopes in 3 hours" then a=3;

As "B and C working together but independently can process the same number (6,000) of envelopes in 2.5 hours" then \frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}=\frac{1}{2.5}=\frac{2}{5};

Also, as "A and C working together but independently process 3000 envelopes in 1 hour", then A and C working together but independently process 2*3,000=6,000 envelopes in 2*1=2 hours: \frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{c}=\frac{1}{2} --> as a=3 then c=6;

So, \frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{6}=\frac{2}{5} --> b=\frac{30}{7}, which means that B produces 6,000 envelopes in 30/7 hours, thus it produces 12,000 envelopes in 60/7 hours.

Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. MAchines B and C working together but independently can process the same number of envelopes in 2.5 hours. If Machines A and C working together but independently process 3000 envelopes in 1 hour, then how many hours would it take Machine B to process 12000 envelopes.

2 3 4 6 8 - Correct Answer

I got this far:

Machine C = 6 hours for 6000 envelopes

Then (1/T) = (1/b) +(1/c)

1/2.5 = (1/b) + (1/6) b= (30/7) for 6000 envelopes or (60/7) for 12000 envelopes.

Why isnt the answer coming up to exactly 8?

In work rate questions, generally different people have to complete the same amount of work. In this question, to make it a little tricky, they have given varying amount of work done by the machines. To make the question straight forward, first thing you can do is make the work the same for all: Machine A processes 12000 envelopes in - 6 hrs Machines B and C process 12000 in - 5 hrs Machines A and C process 12000 in - 4 hrs I chose to get them all to 12000 since my question has 12000 in it. Also, I easily get rid of all decimals. Now, I just find 1/6 + 1/c = 1/4 and get c = 12 and 1/b + 1/12 = 1/5 so b = 60/7 hrs _________________

forget abt the variables a,b,c,d.....in this simple problem

A - 6000 in 3 hrs ==> 2000 in 1 hr BC- 6000 - in 2.5 hrs == 2400 in 1 hr AC - 3000 in 1 hr

take AC -3000 in 1 hr , in which A's contribution is 2000 in 1 hr, hence C's contribution is 1000 in 1 hr take BC -2400 , in which C's contribution is 1000 in 1 hr, hence B's contribution is 1400 in 1 hr.

B - 1400 - 1 hr ==> 12000 in 12000/1400 hrs = 60/7

forget abt the variables a,b,c,d.....in this simple problem

A - 6000 in 3 hrs ==> 2000 in 1 hr BC- 6000 - in 2.5 hrs == 2400 in 1 hr AC - 3000 in 1 hr

take AC -3000 in 1 hr , in which A's contribution is 2000 in 1 hr, hence C's contribution is 1000 in 1 hr take BC -2400 , in which C's contribution is 1000 in 1 hr, hence B's contribution is 1400 in 1 hr.

B - 1400 - 1 hr ==> 12000 in 12000/1400 hrs = 60/7

Regards, Murali.

Adding to Murali's approach....

A = 2000 B+C = 2400 A+C = 3000 => C = 3000-1 = 3000-2000 = 1000

=> B = 2400 -C =2400-1000 =1400

hence B can process 1400 Envelopes in 1hour...how much time wud it take B to process 12000 Envelopes = 12000/1400 = 60/7

Machine A rate- 2000 envelopes Machine B+C rate- 2400 envelopes Since A + C = 3000 envelopes A's rate is 2000 envelopes as above, C has a rate of 1000 envelopes per hour. Which makes machine B's rate as 1400 envelopes per hour.

Thus, it will take 8 hours to manufacture 12000 envelopes.

Re: Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. Machines B [#permalink]
30 May 2013, 09:50

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

shash wrote:

Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. Machines B and C working together but independently can process the same number of envelopes in 2.5 hours. If Machines A and C working together but independently process 3000 envelopes in 1 hour, then how many hours would it take Machine B to process 12000 envelopes.

A. 2 B. 3 C. 4 D. 6 E. 8

Machine A takes 3 hours for 6000 envelopes. Thus, Machine A would take exactly 6 hours for 12000 envelopes. Also, we know that machines B and C, working together, can produce the same no of envelopes in 2.5 hours. Thus, ifr_B andr_C are the rates respectively , we know that(r_B+r_C)*\frac{5}{2} = 6000 --> (r_B+r_C) = 2400. Thus, even if we assume that r_B = 2000 (which is the same rate as that of Machine A), Machine B would again need 6 hours. However, asr_C= 1000, we know for sure thatr_B <2000. Thus, the only option more than 6 hours is E(Assuming that the correct OA is provided with the question). _________________

Machine A rate- 2000 envelopes Machine B+C rate- 2400 envelopes Since A + C = 3000 envelopes A's rate is 2000 envelopes as above, C has a rate of 1000 envelopes per hour. Which makes machine B's rate as 1400 envelopes per hour.

Thus, it will take 8 hours to manufacture 12000 envelopes.

Answer:-E

I did this but shouldn't the work take 9 hours instead? In 8 hours machine B would have made 1400 * 8 = 11200 envelopes. In order to make 12000 it would require a fraction of an hour to create 200 more envelopes. Am I mistaken?

Machine A rate- 2000 envelopes Machine B+C rate- 2400 envelopes Since A + C = 3000 envelopes A's rate is 2000 envelopes as above, C has a rate of 1000 envelopes per hour. Which makes machine B's rate as 1400 envelopes per hour.

Thus, it will take 8 hours to manufacture 12000 envelopes.

Answer:-E

I did this but shouldn't the work take 9 hours instead? In 8 hours machine B would have made 1400 * 8 = 11200 envelopes. In order to make 12000 it would require a fraction of an hour to create 200 more envelopes. Am I mistaken?

As mentioned above, the OA is incorrect. In fact, the options are incorrect since none of them is 60/7 hrs (which is the answer). _________________

Machine A rate- 2000 envelopes Machine B+C rate- 2400 envelopes Since A + C = 3000 envelopes A's rate is 2000 envelopes as above, C has a rate of 1000 envelopes per hour. Which makes machine B's rate as 1400 envelopes per hour.

Thus, it will take 8 hours to manufacture 12000 envelopes.

Answer:-E

I did this but shouldn't the work take 9 hours instead? In 8 hours machine B would have made 1400 * 8 = 11200 envelopes. In order to make 12000 it would require a fraction of an hour to create 200 more envelopes. Am I mistaken?

Re: Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. Machines B [#permalink]
09 Jun 2013, 19:52

Expert's post

samheeta wrote:

How much time should one take in solving these kind of questions which involves though simple yet a lot of calculations?

This can be easily done in under 2 mins. If you look at the explanation provided above:

To make the question straight forward, first thing you can do is make the work the same for all: Machine A processes 12000 envelopes in - 6 hrs Machines B and C process 12000 in - 5 hrs Machines A and C process 12000 in - 4 hrs I chose to get them all to 12000 since my question has 12000 in it. Also, I easily get rid of all decimals.

Almost no calculations till here

Now, I just find 1/6 + 1/c = 1/4 and get c = 12 and 1/b + 1/12 = 1/5 so b = 60/7 hrs

You should be comfortable with manipulating fractions. 1/c = 1/4 - 1/6 = 2/24 = 1/12 So c = 12 (Finding c should take just a few seconds) _________________

Re: Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. Machines B [#permalink]
09 Jun 2013, 20:56

1

This post received KUDOS

shash wrote:

Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. Machines B and C working together but independently can process the same number of envelopes in 2.5 hours. If Machines A and C working together but independently process 3000 envelopes in 1 hour, then how many hours would it take Machine B to process 12000 envelopes.

A. 2 B. 3 C. 4 D. 6 E. 60/7

You can either take the amount of work done as the same as Karishma has done or take the work done by each in the same time. I will do the latter

1. Work done in 1 hr by A is 2000 envelopes 2. Work done in 1 hr by A and C is 3000 envelopes 3. So work done in 1 hr by C is 1000 envelopes 4. Work done in 1 hr by B and C is 2400 envelopes 5. So work done in 1 hr by B is 1400 envelopes 6. So to process 12000 envelopes B will take 12000/1400 hrs = 60/7 hrs

Re: Machine A can process 6000 envelopes in 3 hours. Machines B [#permalink]
17 Jun 2014, 08:27

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...