Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2013, 07:29

3

This post received KUDOS

18

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:26) correct
42% (01:28) wrong based on 743 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x widgets every 4 minutes. Machine N, working alone at its constant rate, produces y widgets every 5 minutes. If machines M and N working simultaneously at their respective constant rates for 20 minutes, does machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time ?

1) x > 0.8y 2) y = x + 1

My question :

1st statement tells that x/y < 4/5 => this means x's rate is more than y hence its sufficient to answer that machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time

2nd statement says that y = x + 1 so if x = 2 widgets then y = 3 widgets this means that in 20 minutes x will produce 10 widgets and in same time y will produce 12 widgets so we get a definite answer hence its sufficient

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x widgets every 4 minutes. Machine N, working alone at its constant rate, produces y widgets every 5 minutes. If machines M and N working simultaneously at their respective constant rates for 20 minutes, does machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time ?

The rate of M = x/4 widgets per minute. The rate of N = y/5 widgets per minute.

The question basically asks whether x/4 > y/5 (if per minute M produces more widgets than N, then M obviously produces more widgets than N, in 20, 30, ... or in any time period. So, we can compare the rates per 1 minute).

(1) x > 0.8y --> x > 4/5*y --> x/4 > y/5. Sufficient.

(2) y = x + 1. The question becomes: is x/4 > (x+1)/5, or is x>4. We don't know that. Not sufficient.

Re: Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Mar 2014, 00:40

Bunuel wrote:

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x widgets every 4 minutes. Machine N, working alone at its constant rate, produces y widgets every 5 minutes. If machines M and N working simultaneously at their respective constant rates for 20 minutes, does machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time ?

The rate of M = x/4 widgets per minute. The rate of N = y/5 widgets per minute.

The question basically asks whether x/4 > y/5 (if per minute M produces more widgets than N, then M obviously produces more widgets than N, in 20, 30, ... or in any time period. So, we can compare the rates per 1 minute).

(1) x > 0.8y --> x > 4/5*y --> x/4 > y/5. Sufficient.

(2) y = x + 1. The question becomes: is x/4 > (x+1)/5, or is x>4. We don't know that. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel,

I am not able to understand statement B. Can you please elaborate...
_________________

"Where are my Kudos" ............ Good Question = kudos

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x widgets every 4 minutes. Machine N, working alone at its constant rate, produces y widgets every 5 minutes. If machines M and N working simultaneously at their respective constant rates for 20 minutes, does machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time ?

The rate of M = x/4 widgets per minute. The rate of N = y/5 widgets per minute.

The question basically asks whether x/4 > y/5 (if per minute M produces more widgets than N, then M obviously produces more widgets than N, in 20, 30, ... or in any time period. So, we can compare the rates per 1 minute).

(1) x > 0.8y --> x > 4/5*y --> x/4 > y/5. Sufficient.

(2) y = x + 1. The question becomes: is x/4 > (x+1)/5, or is x>4. We don't know that. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel,

I am not able to understand statement B. Can you please elaborate...

The question asks: is x/4 > y/5 ?

(2) says: y = x + 1. Substitute y = x + 1 into the question: is x/4 > (x+1)/5? --> is x > 4? Since we cannot answer this question, then this statement is not sufficient.

Re: Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Mar 2015, 11:17

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

The way that you choose to organize your notes can often impact how much work you have to do to answer a given GMAT question (as well as the difficulty of the work). As such, part of your practice should really involve proper note-taking and working on the most 'efficient' ways for you to take notes, 'set up' your work, etc.

Here, we're told about the rates of 2 machines: Machine M can produce X widgets in 4 minutes Machine N can produce Y widgets in 5 minutes

We're then told that each machine works for 20 minutes. We're asked if Machine M produces more widgets than Machine N during that time.

During those 20 minutes, Machine M will produce 5X widgets and Machine N will produce 4Y widgets. In real simple terms, the question asks "is 5X > 4Y?" This is a YES/NO question. A mix of TESTing VALUES and Algebra will help to answer this question.

Fact 1: X > 0.8Y

We can multiply both sides of this inequality by 10....

10X > 8Y

Then divide both sides by 2...

5X > 4Y

Notice how the question asked "is 5X > 4Y?".... Fact 1 tells us that 5X IS greater than 4Y. Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

Fact 2: Y = X + 1

IF.... X = 1 Y = 2 5(1) is NOT > 4(2) and the answer to the question is NO.

IF... X = 10 Y = 11 5(10) IS > 4(11) and the answer to the question is YES. Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Re: Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 May 2015, 09:39

1

This post received KUDOS

IMHO, this is a fairly easy question but the language will deceive you and you will mark the wrong answer unless you muscle the algebra. I solved by intuition and got it wrong.

So basically the question is, "Is the work done by Machine M is greater than the work done by N" (in 20 min)

M will do more work if its rate is more than N so is x/4 > y/5? x > 4/5(y) or is x > 0.8(y) ? - this is the Question

Statement 1 is a direct answer

Statement 2 becomes: x/4 > y/5? x/4 > (x+1)/5? x/4 > (x+1)/4+1? - this is a general property of ratios. the inequality is true if x<4. Since we don't know the value of x, state2 is insufficient.

You bring up a number of important points in your post that are worth emphasizing:

1) Many DS questions ARE actually pretty easy, so you shouldn't take any chances when it comes to solving them - do the necessary work and get those points!

2) A Test Taker's "instinct" when dealing with DS question can often be incorrect, so you have to do enough work to PROVE that your instinct is correct.

3) Taking the time to "rewrite" the question can often lead to shortcuts later on in the work.

Re: Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 May 2015, 11:08

EMPOWERgmatRichC wrote:

Hi AjChakravarthy,

You bring up a number of important points in your post that are worth emphasizing:

1) Many DS questions ARE actually pretty easy, so you shouldn't take any chances when it comes to solving them - do the necessary work and get those points!

2) A Test Taker's "instinct" when dealing with DS question can often be incorrect, so you have to do enough work to PROVE that your instinct is correct.

3) Taking the time to "rewrite" the question can often lead to shortcuts later on in the work.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, - very powerful.

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x widgets every 4 minutes. Machine N, working alone at its constant rate, produces y widgets every 5 minutes. If machines M and N working simultaneously at their respective constant rates for 20 minutes, does machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time ?

1) x > 0.8y 2) y = x + 1

My question :

1st statement tells that x/y < 4/5 => this means x's rate is more than y hence its sufficient to answer that machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time

2nd statement says that y = x + 1 so if x = 2 widgets then y = 3 widgets this means that in 20 minutes x will produce 10 widgets and in same time y will produce 12 widgets so we get a definite answer hence its sufficient

Thats why I chose D but the OA is A

Can someone please explain ?

Instead of picking numbers on this question, one might try to sit back and work out the logic of statement 2. It is quite simple once you get down to it.

You want to know whether x/4 > y/5. (x and y are good positive integers so no complications.) So if x is greater than y, certainly x/4 will be greater than y/5 because x is divided by a smaller number. If x is smaller than y, then it depends on how much smaller. If x is only slightly smaller than y, then it is possible that x/4 > y/5.

2nd statement says that y = x + 1 So x is 1 smaller than y. Now the problem is that you don't know the values of x and y so you don't know whether this 1 is huge in comparison to x and y or little. Therefore, you cannot say whether x/4 will be smaller or y/5.
_________________

Re: Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Aug 2015, 21:03

Bunuel wrote:

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x widgets every 4 minutes. Machine N, working alone at its constant rate, produces y widgets every 5 minutes. If machines M and N working simultaneously at their respective constant rates for 20 minutes, does machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time ?

The rate of M = x/4 widgets per minute. The rate of N = y/5 widgets per minute.

The question basically asks whether x/4 > y/5 (if per minute M produces more widgets than N, then M obviously produces more widgets than N, in 20, 30, ... or in any time period. So, we can compare the rates per 1 minute).

(1) x > 0.8y --> x > 4/5*y --> x/4 > y/5. Sufficient.

(2) y = x + 1. The question becomes: is x/4 > (x+1)/5, or is x>4. We don't know that. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Banuel: Is the following reasoning correct/possible to identify statement (2) as sufficient? Reasoning as follows:

Because we know x > 4, it must be at least 5 assuming you can't have a fraction of a widget (i.e. you can't produce 4.5 widgets every 4 minutes). Given that y = x + 1 which yields 6 in this case, then 5/4 > 6/5 is in fact true. Furthermore, this inequality stays true as the value of x increases. Thus, the statement could be sufficient?

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x widgets every 4 minutes. Machine N, working alone at its constant rate, produces y widgets every 5 minutes. If machines M and N working simultaneously at their respective constant rates for 20 minutes, does machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time ?

The rate of M = x/4 widgets per minute. The rate of N = y/5 widgets per minute.

The question basically asks whether x/4 > y/5 (if per minute M produces more widgets than N, then M obviously produces more widgets than N, in 20, 30, ... or in any time period. So, we can compare the rates per 1 minute).

(1) x > 0.8y --> x > 4/5*y --> x/4 > y/5. Sufficient.

(2) y = x + 1. The question becomes: is x/4 > (x+1)/5, or is x>4. We don't know that. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Banuel: Is the following reasoning correct/possible to identify statement (2) as sufficient? Reasoning as follows:

Because we know x > 4, it must be at least 5 assuming you can't have a fraction of a widget (i.e. you can't produce 4.5 widgets every 4 minutes). Given that y = x + 1 which yields 6 in this case, then 5/4 > 6/5 is in fact true. Furthermore, this inequality stays true as the value of x increases. Thus, the statement could be sufficient?

No, that's not correct. We can say, for example, that machine M produces 0.5 widgets every 4 minutes, this would mean that to produce 1 widget it needs 8 minutes.
_________________

Re: Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Sep 2015, 11:44

tigrr49 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x widgets every 4 minutes. Machine N, working alone at its constant rate, produces y widgets every 5 minutes. If machines M and N working simultaneously at their respective constant rates for 20 minutes, does machine M produce more widgets than machine N in that time ?

The rate of M = x/4 widgets per minute. The rate of N = y/5 widgets per minute.

The question basically asks whether x/4 > y/5 (if per minute M produces more widgets than N, then M obviously produces more widgets than N, in 20, 30, ... or in any time period. So, we can compare the rates per 1 minute).

(1) x > 0.8y --> x > 4/5*y --> x/4 > y/5. Sufficient.

(2) y = x + 1. The question becomes: is x/4 > (x+1)/5, or is x>4. We don't know that. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Banuel: Is the following reasoning correct/possible to identify statement (2) as sufficient? Reasoning as follows:

Because we know x > 4, it must be at least 5 assuming you can't have a fraction of a widget (i.e. you can't produce 4.5 widgets every 4 minutes). Given that y = x + 1 which yields 6 in this case, then 5/4 > 6/5 is in fact true. Furthermore, this inequality stays true as the value of x increases. Thus, the statement could be sufficient?

That's circular reasoning. The question we are trying to answer is if \(\frac{x}{4}>\frac{y}{5}\) and so it cannot be combined with a true statement. I would like to add that, if \(x=2\) and \(y=3\), then machine M produces 10 widgets and machine N produces 12 widgets, and therefore, machine M can produce less widgets per 20 minutes than machine N does.

Re: Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2016, 08:36

Hi Bunuel,

So basically we are comparing x/4 to 0.8y/4(keeping base same as 4). In second choice, y=x+1. so hence we are now trying to check if x>0.8(x+1) or 0.8x+0.8 I assumed that that 0.8y has to be an integer. Is this assumption correct. I took this assumption and arrived at that x>=0.8x+0.8 for any value where 0.8x+0.8 is an integer. Hence 2 is insufficient. Please tell me if this approach is Ok

Re: Machine M, working alone at its constant rate, produces x wi [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jan 2017, 14:49

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...