Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 16:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1628
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 1056 [1] , given: 2

Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2010, 10:20
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

45% (03:24) correct 55% (02:21) wrong based on 69 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been pressuring us to give favorable mention to their products in our articles, but they should realize that for us to yield to their wishes would actually be against their interests. To remain an effective advertising vehicle, we must have loyal readership, and we would soon lost that readership if our readers suspect that our editorial integrity has been compromised by pandering to advertisers.
Advertising-sales director: You underestimate the sophistication of our readers. They recognize that the advertisements we carry are not articles, so their response to the advertisements has never depended on their opinion of the editorial integrity of the magazine as a whole.

Which one of the following is the most accurate assessment of the advertising-sales director’s argument as a response to the magazine editor’s argument?
(A) It succeeds because it shows that the editor’s argument depends on an unwarranted assumption about factors affecting an advertisement’s effectiveness.
(B) It success because it exposes as mistaken the editor’s estimation of the sophistication of the magazine’s readers.
(C) It succeeds because it undermines the editor’s claim about how the magazine’s editorial integrity would be affected by allowing advertisers to influence articles.
(D) It fails because the editor’s argument does not depend on any assumption about readers’ response to the advertisements they see in the magazine.
(E) It fails because it is based on a misunderstanding of the editor’s view about how readers respond to advertisements they see in the magazine.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

The magazine editor’s argument assumes which one of the following?
(A) A magazine editor should never be influenced in the performance of his or her professional duties by the wishes of the companies that regularly advertise in the magazine.
(B) The magazine cannot give any favorable mention in its articles to its regular advertisers without compromising its reputation for editorial integrity.
(C) Favorable mention of their products in the magazine’s articles is of less value to the advertisers than is the continued effectiveness of the magazine as an advertising vehicle.
(D) Giving favorable mention to a product in a magazine article is a more effective form of advertising than is an explicit advertisement for the product in the same magazine.
(E) Carrying paid advertisements can never pose any threat to the magazine’s reputation for editorial integrity nor to the loyalty of its readership.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Last edited by carcass on 15 Jan 2015, 02:53, edited 2 times in total.
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1473
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 13

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2010, 07:59
C and C for me...noboru pls post OA... thanks
Intern
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 24
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2010, 11:07
C and B for me..
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 21
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 3

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2010, 19:37
I went for A and C.

IMO, the first question is tougher than the second one:

In the 1st question, I think that both A and C are nice contenders, but I think that answer A is more accurate, since it describes better the situation (editor's argument is based in an unwarranted assumption). However, I may be wrong in this one.

I think that answer B in the 2nd question is wrong because the magazine editor would probably agree if the an article in the magazine contains well deserved praise for one of the products, even if this product is advertised in the magazine.
Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 111
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2010, 20:12
C and B for me too.. pls post the answers
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 297
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2010, 21:44
IMO D and B.
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1628
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 1056 [0], given: 2

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2010, 00:06
You are all wrong.

Any more takers before I post the OAs?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Posts: 167
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 64

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2010, 05:33
E for the first and B for the second
_________________

But there’s something in me that just keeps going on. I think it has something to do with tomorrow, that there is always one, and that everything can change when it comes.
http://aimingformba.blogspot.com

Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 21
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 3

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2010, 06:00
Second try: D and C

When I read it first time, I thought that director's argument failed, but I wasn't happy with answers D and E.

After rereading it, I think that D makes sense, since editor's opinion is based in readers' reactions to articles, and not to ads.

Posted from my mobile device
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1628
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 1056 [0], given: 2

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2010, 06:18
vbarrozo wrote:
Second try: D and C

When I read it first time, I thought that director's argument failed, but I wasn't happy with answers D and E.

After rereading it, I think that D makes sense, since editor's opinion is based in readers' reactions to articles, and not to ads.

Posted from my mobile device

Correct.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Posts: 446
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 157

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2010, 08:13
noboru wrote:
Big monster:

Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been pressuring us to give favorable mention to their products in our articles, but they should realize that for us to yield to their wishes would actually be against their interests. To remain an effective advertising vehicle, we must have loyal readership, and we would soon loose that readership if our readers suspect that our editorial integrity has been compromised by pandering to advertisers.
Advertising-sales director: You underestimate the sophistication of our readers. They recognize that the advertisements we carry are not articles, so their response to the advertisements has never depended on their opinion of the editorial integrity of the magazine as a whole.

What is being discussed
Director says that readers are intelligent than you assume and their decision to buy is not dependent on the editorial`s integrity.

D

Corrected to D, The editor does not assume anything, he just states a opinion that if (suppose) the readers detect that the integrity is compromised, then sales will fall.

if the editor said the sales will fall because readers would detect that the integrity is compromised, then it would be an assumption

Which one of the following is the most accurate assessment of the advertising-sales director’s argument as a response to the magazine editor’s argument?
(A) It succeeds because it shows that the editor’s argument depends on an unwarranted assumption about factors affecting an advertisement’s effectiveness.
(B) It success because it exposes as mistaken the editor’s estimation of the sophistication of the magazine’s readers.
(C) It succeeds because it undermines the editor’s claim about how the magazine’s editorial integrity would be affected by allowing advertisers to influence articles.
(D) It fails because the editor’s argument does not depend on any assumption about readers’ response to the advertisements they see in the magazine.
(E) It fails because it is based on a misunderstanding of the editor’s view about how readers respond to advertisements they see in the magazine.

C The editor assumes that favouring advertisements would decrease the value of the magazine and hence advertisers would be affected.

The magazine editor’s argument assumes which one of the following?
(A) A magazine editor should never be influenced in the performance of his or her professional duties by the wishes of the companies that regularly advertise in the magazine.
(B) The magazine cannot give any favorable mention in its articles to its regular advertisers without compromising its reputation for editorial integrity.
(C) Favorable mention of their products in the magazine’s articles is of less value to the advertisers than is the continued effectiveness of the magazine as an advertising vehicle.
(D) Giving favorable mention to a product in a magazine article is a more effective form of advertising than is an explicit advertisement for the product in the same magazine.
(E) Carrying paid advertisements can never pose any threat to the magazine’s reputation for editorial integrity nor to the loyalty of its readership.

_________________

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 117
GPA: 4
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 33

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2010, 04:19
Can someone please explain why "C" fails for the first question?.
_________________

-If you like my post, consider giving KUDOS

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 194
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2010, 21:21
Oh .. I went for E and B ........what bug has bitten me ........

1)D ...is correct ....but
2)Why C ? why not B .....
Manager
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 52
Schools: LBS, Harvard, Booth, Stanford, ISB, NTU
WE 1: S/W Engineer
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 15

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2010, 19:29
I could zero in on D for 1st one, but was confused with C or D for the 2nd.
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 573 [0], given: 6

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2010, 06:56
Can someone explain how C can be the assumption for the second question.

"Favorable mention of their products in the magazine’s articles is of less value to the advertisers than is the continued effectiveness of the magazine as an advertising vehicle."

Editor says that advertisers are pressuring him to incorporate favorable mention of their products then howcome the assumption is that "Favorable mention of their products in the magazine’s articles is of less value to the advertisers" as in option (C).
Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 471
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 24

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2010, 07:39
IMO D & C have to read it more than once to get a clearer picture. Nice question
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Intern
Joined: 21 Mar 2011
Posts: 22
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 13

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2015, 12:48
Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been pressuring us to give favorable mention to their products in our articles, but they should realize that for us to yield to their wishes would actually be against their interests. To remain an effective advertising vehicle, we must have loyal readership, and we would soon lost that readership if our readers suspect that our editorial integrity has been compromised by pandering to advertisers.

Advertising-sales director: You underestimate the sophistication of our readers. They recognize that the advertisements we carry are not articles, so their response to the advertisements has never depended on their opinion of the editorial integrity of the magazine as a whole.

The magazine editor’s argument assumes which one of the following?
(A) A magazine editor should never be influenced in the performance of his or her professional duties by the wishes of the companies that regularly advertise in the magazine.
(B) The magazine cannot give any favorable mention in its articles to its regular advertisers without compromising its reputation for editorial integrity.
(C) Favorable mention of their products in the magazine’s articles is of less value to the advertisers than is the continued effectiveness of the magazine as an advertising vehicle.
(D) Giving favorable mention to a product in a magazine article is a more effective form of advertising than is an explicit advertisement for the product in the same magazine.
(E) Carrying paid advertisements can never pose any threat to the magazine’s reputation for editorial integrity nor to the loyalty of its readership.

The anwer is C and I cant figure out the reason. Also negation of B will be "The magazine can give any favorable mention in its articles to its regular advertisers without compromising its reputation for editorial integrity" or "The magazine can give any favorable mention in its articles to its regular advertisers with compromising its reputation for editorial integrity." ?

I feel option would have made more sense if it was "Favorable mention of their products in the magazine’s articles is of less value to the magazine than is the continued effectiveness of the magazine as an advertising vehicle" or "Favorable mention of their products in the magazine’s articles is of less value than is the continued effectiveness of the magazine as an advertising vehicle" . Please assist.
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6516 [0], given: 1008

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2015, 14:17
Merged similar topic

Please use the search button before to post a question and follow the forum rules for postin on the board

Regards
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 315
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 113

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2015, 21:16
I go with C for first Question and D for the second.

carcass wrote:
Merged similar topic

Please use the search button before to post a question and follow the forum rules for postin on the board

Regards

_________________

Kudos to you, for helping me with some KUDOS.

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 783

Kudos [?]: 6516 [0], given: 1008

Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2015, 02:50

Source: Answer key from LSAT Preptest 17, Section 2, Question nos: 22 & 23

Not a good source to practice for our exam.

Regards
_________________
Re: Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been   [#permalink] 15 Jan 2015, 02:50
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Representative : " Our prison system have been criticized for having 2 13 Sep 2014, 10:27
14 Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal 1 27 Feb 2013, 07:21
37 Editor: Articles in Gardening Magazine often spur sales of 21 03 Aug 2011, 14:34
1 Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal 13 25 Oct 2008, 16:23
Q41: Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a 3 05 Jun 2007, 09:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by