Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jul 2016, 17:40
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 0

Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2005, 21:23
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (02:05) correct 37% (01:10) wrong based on 775 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.


a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety

e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by fameatop on 22 Sep 2013, 19:27, edited 1 time in total.
OA added & Tagged
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 725
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Aug 2005, 05:06
B it is,

Lowering is used for crime rates and fears both...

Rest all have problems. They use along with, as well as and other unncessary wordier words...
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2005, 05:02
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Yes you guys are right. OA is B.

When i posted this question I had a question regarding the use of 'and'. But i looked up a similar question in OG and found that 'along with' is wrong because it seems as if 'along with fears about public safety' is a seperate effect. But infact the 'a lowering of crime rates' is what also causes a 'lowering of fears about public safety' so it should be co-ordinated with 'and'

So from this is it safe to say: We use 'and' in a series such as the one we have here, when we want to emphasize an effect (lowering of fears about public safety ) because of another related cause (a lowering of crime rates) ?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 16

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2013, 12:29
And choice 'e' is the passive voice. Incorrect. Must be 'b'.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 152
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT Date: 08-01-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 29

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2014, 23:46
Guys,

I am not clear why " a" is wrong?
_________________

"Where are my Kudos" ............ Good Question = kudos

"Start enjoying all phases" & all Sections

__________________________________________________________________
http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-of-articles-on-critical-reasoning-159959.html

http://gmatclub.com/forum/percentages-700-800-level-questions-130588.html

http://gmatclub.com/forum/700-to-800-level-quant-question-with-detail-soluition-143321.html

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 534

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2014, 03:59
I am still not clear about "and" in b and "along with" in c....can anyone explain..pls..........
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 182
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 260 [0], given: 56

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jan 2014, 05:17
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety
'rates of crime' is wrong usage. for ex. tax rates of Europe, marginal rates of substitution. Also, 'lowering rates...' is not parallel with', 'a surge...' and 'a lessening of ..'

the entities in parallel are noun phrases == noun + prepositional phrase type.

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety
Parallelism(stated in option a) maintained.

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety
Parallelism is ruined because crime rates and fears are parallel (within the parallel structure). But this option states that 'lowering of crime rates' and 'fears about public safety' are parallel. This is wrong parallelism.

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety
e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with.
D & E not parallel for reasons mentioned in A
_________________

Read my posts...
What are modifiers ??

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8842
Followers: 777

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Sep 2015, 13:44
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2015
Posts: 198
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 150

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2015, 21:31
Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.

Parallelism is the key here.

I read a book, the apple was eaten by me and my friends were watching the show. This statement uses three different verb forms and hence violates parallelism, which requires that all verbs be in form (of course not at a cost of logic). In the question, the underlined part should be parallel to the boldfaced part.

a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety not parallel

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety Parallel: a lowering of, a surge in, a lessening of

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety Parallel, but loses the meaning. 'Along with' is changing the mean of what is decreasing'

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety Not parallel

e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with. Not parallel
_________________

Fais de ta vie un rêve et d'un rêve une réalité

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 390
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 90

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2016, 12:49
karthikmeda wrote:
Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the number of police personnel "walking the beat" should lead to lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety, a surge in public confidence in the police, and a lessening of the economic burden of street crime.


a) lowering rates of crime, as well as lowering fears about public safety
lowering fears is wrong.

b) a lowering of crime rates and of fears about public safety
a lowering of X AND Y : of crime rates and of fears - parallelism.

c) a lowering of crime rates, along with fears about public safety
Meaning is changed- a lowering of crime rates, along with fears (too awkward).

d) crime rates being lowered, along with fears about public safety
lead to X is fine. but lead to being X is incorrect. hence- being lowered is incorrect.

e) crime rates and fears about public safety being lowered, with.
Same as D.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
helpful post means press '+1' for Kudos!
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Re: Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the   [#permalink] 01 Apr 2016, 12:49
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
11 So substantial has been the increase in demand for princex303 10 19 Jul 2012, 22:49
Experts publish their posts in the topic According to criminologists, the cause of riots among many martie11 3 24 Nov 2010, 13:55
According to criminologists, the cause of riots among many raghavakumar85 6 17 Jul 2010, 13:24
1 Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many stevegt 14 17 Jul 2007, 18:35
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many ffgmat 16 21 Aug 2006, 02:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Many criminologists argue that a substantial increase in the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.