Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Jun 2013, 09:44
Customize  |  Hide

Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 14
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 9

Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2012, 05:12
00:00

Question Stats:

81% (02:14) correct 18% (00:53) wrong based on 33 sessions
Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety standards are actually impairing car safety in Country X. These critics note that car manufacturers only have to meet the minimum requirements of the government in order to be viewed as safe by the consuming public. If no standards were set, manufacturers would need to compete on safety in order to have any customers at all.

Which of the following is an assumption made by the critics in the argument above?

A. Large cars, such as trucks and sport utility vehicles, are inherently safer than small cars.
B. A significant proportion of car customers own more than one car.
C. The minimum safety requirements decreed by the government of Country X are considered intolerably unsafe.
D. Other factors in a customer's car purchase decision, such as price and comfort features, are more important than safety concerns.
E. In the absence of safety standards, potential car customers will be able to tell which cars are the most safe.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Fighting hard
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Posts: 79
GMAT Date: 10-01-2012
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 84

Re: car safety standards [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2012, 05:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
A- There is no reference to any other vehicle other than cars in the Stimulus.
B- Car Safety is the point of contention and not ownership
C- Too big a stretch to assume this. This assumption does not support the premise.
D- Negation of this assumption does not disrupt the premise.
E- Perfect as an assumption. Negation of this assumption makes the entire Stimulus baseless.

_________________

I will rather do nothing than be busy doing nothing - Zen saying

MBA Section Director
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 1273
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 238

Kudos [?]: 862 [0], given: 517

Re: car safety standards [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 04:21
sajini wrote:
Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety standards are actually impairing car safety in Country X. These critics note that car manufacturers only have to meet the minimum requirements of the government in order to be viewed as safe by the consuming public. If no standards were set, manufacturers would need to compete on safety in order to have any customers at all.

Which of the following is an assumption made by the critics in the argument above?

A. Large cars, such as trucks and sport utility vehicles, are inherently safer than small cars.
B. A significant proportion of car customers own more than one car.
C. The minimum safety requirements decreed by the government of Country X are considered intolerably unsafe.
D. Other factors in a customer's car purchase decision, such as price and comfort features, are more important than safety concerns.
E. In the absence of safety standards, potential car customers will be able to tell which cars are the most safe.


Conclusion of the argument: If there were NO govt set standards, car manufacturers would provide safety as a quantifiable feature to attract consumers. In other words as safety goes up consumer purchase of cars goes up.

Only E states the assumption that is, the consumer themselves MUST know how to select between 2 cars with comparable (or not) safety. If they fail to differentiate then the consumers will not buy cars with respect to the safety incorporated in them.
_________________

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 512
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 88 [1] , given: 262

Re: car safety standards [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 04:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
+1 E

I got stuck between C and E. After using negation I found E as a better answer, anyhow the word "intolerable" in the option C is too extreme.
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

Re: car safety standards   [#permalink] 18 Sep 2012, 04:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great anandnk 6 03 Jan 2004, 18:06
New posts The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal chihao 8 17 Jan 2004, 11:29
New posts The excessive number of safety regulation that the federal batliwala 9 01 Apr 2004, 07:10
New posts Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great WinWinMBA 7 06 Jun 2005, 12:34
New posts Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great vineetgupta 5 23 Mar 2007, 10:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.