Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 22:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Mass Media...Government

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 141
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Mass Media...Government [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2005, 14:11
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the declining importance of the two major political parties. It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms. It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best.



Which of the following is an assumption made in the argument above?

(A) The amount of money raised and spent by a political party is one valid criterion for judging the influence of the party.

(B) A significant increase in the number of third-party candidates would be evidence of a decline in the importance of the two major parties.

(C) The two-party system has contributed significantly to the stability of the American political structure.

(D) The mass media tend to favor an independent or third-party candidate over a candidate from one of the two major parties.

(E) The mass media are relatively unimportant in deciding the outcome of most elections.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 674
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2005, 18:10
E....
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 377
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2005, 09:26
Picked B over D.

D - although MM may tend to support , the sums spent by the parties may negate their bias, hence not assumed in the stem.

HMTG.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 47
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2005, 11:07
I'll pick B.

Will try to explain if right.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2005, 15:42
I refute B

I would pick B if it would have said about third part candidates winning the elections. An increase in the no of canidates shows and proves nothing to the argument.

I pick E

If mass media were really important, then 3rd party candidates should have won the elections, which did not happen
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 47
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2005, 15:54
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the declining importance of the two major political parties. It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms. It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best.

(B) A significant increase in the number of third-party candidates would be evidence of a decline in the importance of the two major parties.

Since no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election, I think the article assumes that an increase in third-party candidates would lead a to a decline, is that the assumption?

If the 2 major parties raised and spent more money than ever before, doesn't that mean that the 2 parties think that the mass media is important? Can this refute E?

E sounds more like a conclusion rather than an assumption.

What is the OA?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 47
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2005, 15:57
riteshgupta1 wrote:
I refute B

I would pick B if it would have said about third part candidates winning the elections. An increase in the no of canidates shows and proves nothing to the argument.

I pick E

If mass media were really important, then 3rd party candidates should have won the elections, which did not happen


Come to think of it, you might be right. I can't assume that the increase in candidates lead to them being elected.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 141
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2005, 13:31
Sorry Guys...NO SINGLE RIGHT ANSWER.

Do you want me to post the OA??
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2005, 15:06
After reading the argument again and again and again, I think except A all are junk.

A says that p(money) is necessary to win the election, althought not sufficient.

If P is necessary, then elections can be won. No matter what?

So A seems to be it.

D could be inferred from the argument. But if you negate D, nothing happens. Negating all

B) A significant increase in the number of third-party candidates would NOT be evidence of a decline in the importance of the two major parties.
- unless they win
C)The two-party system has not contributed significantly to the stability of the American political structure. out of scope
D)The mass media does not tend to favor an independent or third-party candidate over a candidate from one of the two major parties. (may be or may not be).
E) The mass media are relatively important in deciding the outcome of most elections. (so, who cares.)

A) The amount of money raised and spent by a political party is not one valid criterion for judging the influence of the party.
Then how & Why are they winning...
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3405
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2005, 17:47
How come all of you missed A?

A says that money is= political power and that shows that the 2 parties are still very strong...

A it is..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 47
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2005, 08:33
fresinha12 wrote:
How come all of you missed A?

A says that money is= political power and that shows that the 2 parties are still very strong...

A it is..


Doh, you're right. A it is.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 141
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2005, 09:42
A is the correct answer
  [#permalink] 18 Jul 2005, 09:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Convert mass to volume melguy 2 22 Oct 2011, 21:44
Sharks have a higher ratio of cartilage mass to body mass ham1231 5 20 Jul 2007, 22:52
The public is aware of the possibility of biases in the mass shahnandan 7 31 Jan 2006, 01:22
Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not nakib77 4 01 Nov 2005, 03:47
The public is aware of the possibility of biases in the mass WinWinMBA 7 16 May 2005, 07:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Mass Media...Government

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.