Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

solving for new equation -x-5<4 => x>-9 x+5<4 => x< -1

This means x lies between -9 and -1 or -9<x<-1 hence it doesn't satisfy the equation 1<x<9

C) |x-1|<9

Negative: (x-1)<0 => x>1 This should be x<1 Positive: (x-1)>0 => x>1

solving for new equation -x+1<9 => x>-8 x-1<9 => x<8 This should be x<10

it means x lies between -8 and 8 or -8<x<8 x between -8 & 10 it doesn't satisfy the equation 1<x<9

D)|-5+x|<4

Negative: (-5+x)<0 => x>5 This should be x<5 Positive: (-5+x) >0 => x>5

solving for new equation -5+x<4 => 5-x<4 => x>1 This is the case x<5, your final solution is correct, x>1 -5+x<4 => x<9 This means x>1 but less than 9 or 1<x<9 Hence it proved the relation.

Re: Math: Absolute value (Modulus) [#permalink]
29 Nov 2010, 21:04

Let’s consider following examples,

Example #1I am not understanding this example and really struggling with modulus? Can someone please elaborate and explain in further detail? From this post I can't see how I would use this on every modulus problem? Q.:|x+3| - |4-x| = |8+x|. How many solutions does the equation have? Solution: There are 3 key points here: -8, -3, 4. So we have 4 conditions:

a) x < -8. -(x+3) - (4-x) how did we get -(x+3) here?= -(8+x) --> x = -1. We reject the solution because our condition is not satisfied (-1 is not less than -8)

b) -8 \leq x < -3. -(x+3) - (4-x) = (8+x) --> x = -15. We reject the solution because our condition is not satisfied (-15 is not within (-8,-3) interval.)

c) -3 \leq x < 4. (x+3) - (4-x) = (8+x) --> x = 9. We reject the solution because our condition is not satisfied (-15 is not within (-3,4) interval.)

d) x \geq 4. (x+3) + (4-x) = (8+x) --> x = -1. We reject the solution because our condition is not satisfied (-1 is not more than 4)

I am totally lost with this post and also with other modulus problems I looked up in Gmat club thank you very much for your help in advance!!!!!

Re: Math: Absolute value (Modulus) [#permalink]
30 Nov 2010, 06:09

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

a) x < -8. -(x+3) - (4-x) = -(8+x) --> x = -1. We reject the solution because our condition is not satisfied (-1 is not less than -8)

if x < -8, (x + 3) is always negative. So, modulus is non-negative and we need to change a sign: |x+3| = - (x+3) for x<-8 For example, if x = -10, |-10+3| = |-7| = 7 -(-10+3) = -(-7) = 7

In other words, |x| = x if x is positive and |x|=-x if x is negative. _________________

Re: Math: Absolute value (Modulus) [#permalink]
01 Dec 2010, 10:49

walker wrote:

a) x < -8. -(x+3) - (4-x) = -(8+x) --> x = -1. We reject the solution because our condition is not satisfied (-1 is not less than -8)

if x < -8, (x + 3) is always negative. So, modulus is non-negative and we need to change a sign: |x+3| = - (x+3) for x<-8 For example, if x = -10, |-10+3| = |-7| = 7 -(-10+3) = -(-7) = 7

In other words, |x| = x if x is positive and |x|=-x if x is negative.

Thanks for the explanation Walker. So would this then be correct:

Example #1 Q.: |x+3| - |4-x| = |8+x|. How many solutions does the equation have? Solution: There are 3 key points here: -8, -3, 4. So we have 4 conditions:

a) x < -8. -(x+3) - (4-x) = -(8+x) --> x = -1. |x+3|is always - because x<-8 but l4-xl will always be positive because 4-x= a +, l8+xl will also be negative as well given x<-8

b) -8 \leq x < -3. -(x+3) - (4-x) = (8+x) --> x = -15. on this one lx+3l again can only be negative and l4-xl will be still always be negative but given the range l8+xl may only be postiive hence l8+xl has to be positive or non-negative (o)?

c) -3 \leq x < 4. (x+3) - (4-x) = (8+x) --> x = 9. so on this term first one is positive second term continues to be positive and 3rd term is positive.

d) x \geq 4. (x+3) + (4-x) = (8+x) --> x = -1. on this one first term obviously positive second term is negative therefore the sign changes from - to + so from -(4-x) to +(4-x) since this will always be negative for given x range? And a negative times a negative gets us to a positive?

I just want to make sure I am thinking about this correctly. Thanks walker!

Re: Math: Absolute value (Modulus) [#permalink]
01 Dec 2010, 11:19

Sorry walker one more question on the below as I review this Thinking of inequality with modulus as a segment at the number line.

For example, Problem: 1<x<9. What inequality represents this condition? Image A. |x|<3 B. |x+5|<4 C. |x-1|<9 D. |-5+x|<4 E. |3+x|<5 Solution: 10sec. Traditional 3-steps method is too time-consume technique. First of all we find length (9-1)=8 and center (1+8/2=5) of the segment represented by 1<x<9. Now, let’s look at our options. Only B and D has 8/2=4 on the right side and D had left site 0 at x=5. Therefore, answer is D.

Why would be looking for 4 on the right side? shouldn't this be 5 as the midpoint? And why do we want the left side to be 0 at x=5? Id like to understand this a little better

II. Converting inequalities with modulus into range expression. In many cases, especially in DS problems, it helps avoid silly mistakes.

For example, |x|<5 is equal to x e (-5,5). |x+3|>3 is equal to x e (-inf,-6)&(0,+inf)

How did you convert lx+3l>3 into (-inf,-6) and (0,+inf)

Sorry these maybe simple questions but I just want to grasp the concept firmly

Re: Math: Absolute value (Modulus) [#permalink]
01 Dec 2010, 13:21

4

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

A couple of figures to see what modulus means.

It is quite convenient to remember the definition of modulus. |x| is the distance of x from 0 on the number line. So if |x| = 1, we are looking for points which are at a distance 1 away from 0. If |x| < 1, we are looking for points which are at a distance less than 1 away from 0. If |x| > 1, we are looking for points which are at a distance more than 1 away from 0.

Attachment:

Ques1.jpg [ 14.57 KiB | Viewed 12232 times ]

If |x - 5| < 4, now we are looking for points at a distance less than 4 away from 5.

Re: Math: Absolute value (Modulus) [#permalink]
01 Dec 2010, 18:35

Great thanks for the explanation on that Karishma - very very very helpful.

Can you also help me with how we converted lx+3l>3 into (-inf,-6) and (0,+inf)?

Is this because x+3>=0 (non-negative) and negative x+3<0 (negative). So we get to x+3=3 so x=0 which fits condition 1 above and this will go to infinity

and then

-(x+3)=3 so you get -x=6 or x=-6 which fits condition two above so x<-6 so therefore it goes to negative infinity?

Re: Math: Absolute value (Modulus) [#permalink]
01 Dec 2010, 19:28

3

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

gettinit wrote:

Great thanks for the explanation on that Karishma - very very very helpful.

Can you also help me with how we converted lx+3l>3 into (-inf,-6) and (0,+inf)?

Is this because x+3>=0 (non-negative) and negative x+3<0 (negative). So we get to x+3=3 so x=0 which fits condition 1 above and this will go to infinity

and then

-(x+3)=3 so you get -x=6 or x=-6 which fits condition two above so x<-6 so therefore it goes to negative infinity?

I think I am close. appreciate the help.

Yes, lx+3l>3 gives us two cases

Case 1: x + 3 >= 0 or x > = -3 Then (x + 3) > 3 or we can say x > 0

Case 2: x + 3 < 0 or x < -3 Then -(x + 3) > 3 or we can say x < -6

So either x > 0 which translates to (0, inf) or x < -6 which translates to (-inf, -6)

OR consider that lx+3l>3 means distance of x from -3 is more than 3. If you go to 3 steps to right from -3, you reach 0. Anything after than is ok. If you go 3 steps to left from -3, you reach -6. Anything to its left is ok.

Sloan – Admitted!!! Wharton – Waitlist Booth – Waitlist No Kellogg. Wasn’t enthused about Kellogg anyways. Their campus needs renovation... won’t be renovated in the next 2...

For my Cambridge essay I have to write down by short and long term career objectives as a part of the personal statement. Easy enough I said, done it...