Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
31 Jan 2010, 09:00

Bunuel wrote:

• All prime numbers except 2 and 5 end in 1, 3, 7 or 9, since numbers ending in 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8 are multiples of 2 and numbers ending in 0 or 5 are multiples of 5. Similarly, all prime numbers above 3 are of the form 6n-1 or 6n+1, because all other numbers are divisible by 2 or 3.

Awesome post, thank you so much! +1

What is the quickest way to figure out whether a number is prime? I usually check if it's odd or even, then sum its digits to figure out if it's divisible by 3, then look if it ends in 5 and if all else fails divide it by 7. Is this the recommended approach?

What might be a bit confusing is that while all prime numbers are of the form 6n-1 or 6n+1, not all numbers of that form are in fact prime. I think this is crucial. For instance, the number 49 is 6n+1, but is not prime.

Any insight on a quicker check (if one exists) would be much appreciated and thank you again for your efforts. They make a real difference!

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
31 Jan 2010, 09:19

Expert's post

ariel wrote:

What is the quickest way to figure out whether a number is prime?

Unfortunately, there is no such quick way to say that this number is prime. You can remember all numbers till 50 and then use rule:

Rule: To check whether a number is prime or not, we try to divide it by 2, 3, 5 and so on. You can stop at \sqrt{number} - it is enough. Why? Because if there is prime divisor greater than \sqrt{number}, there must be another prime divisor lesser than \sqrt{number}.

Example,

n = 21 -- > \sqrt{21}~ 4-5 So, we need to check out only 2,3 because for 7, for instance, we have already checked out 3.

n = 101 --> 2,3,5 is out (the last digit is not even or 5 and sum of digits is not divisible by 3). we need to check out only 7 _________________

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
31 Jan 2010, 10:06

Appreciate the very prompt response, walker. To your point re divisibility by 7: I'm having a hard time proving this algebraically, is it a fair statement to say that the only non-prime numbers of the form 6n-1 and 6n+1 are the ones that are divisible by 7?

If so, a quick way to check whether a big number is prime would be to: 1) check whether it's of the form 6n-1 or 6n+1 2) check whether it's divisible by 7

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
31 Jan 2010, 10:34

Expert's post

ariel wrote:

Appreciate the very prompt response, walker. To your point re divisibility by 7: I'm having a hard time proving this algebraically, is it a fair statement to say that the only non-prime numbers of the form 6n-1 and 6n+1 are the ones that are divisible by 7?

If so, a quick way to check whether a big number is prime would be to: 1) check whether it's of the form 6n-1 or 6n+1 2) check whether it's divisible by 7

Is this correct?

Not so. Divisibility by 7 does not check whether the number is prime or not.

Actually this issue is covered in the post. First you should know that all prime numbers except 2 and 5 end in 1, 3, 7 or 9. So if it ends in some other digit it's not prime.

Next, if the above didn't help (meaning that number ends in 1, 3, 7 or 9) there is a way to check whether the number is prime or not. Walker gave an example how to do this, but here it is again:

Verifying the primality of a given number n can be done by trial division, that is to say dividing n by all integer numbers smaller than\sqrt{n}, thereby checking whether n is a multiple of m<\sqrt{n}.

Examples: Verifying the primality of 161: \sqrt{161} is little less than 13. We should check 161 on divisibility by numbers from 2 to 13. From integers from 2 to 13, 161 is divisible by 7, hence 161 is not prime.

Verifying the primality of 149: \sqrt{149} is little more than 12. We should check 149 on divisibility by numbers from 2 to 12, inclusive. 149 is not divisible by any of the integers from 2 to 12, hence 149 is prime.

Verifying the primality of 73: \sqrt{73} is little less than 9. We should check 73 on divisibility by numbers from 2 to 9. 73 is not divisible by any of the integers from 2 to 9, hence 149 is prime.

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
05 Mar 2010, 13:06

Bunuel wrote:

The topic is done. At last!

I'll break it into several smaller ones in a day or two.

Any comments, advises and/or corrections are highly appreciated.

What Topic are we talking abt?? _________________

Cheers! JT........... If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!!

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice| |For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
17 Mar 2010, 13:43

Hi Bunnel,

I m confused about the extent of level for number properties.. do we have to remmeber eculer's, fermat's,wilson's theorem on prime number. Actually I found their application to be quite useful but m not sure whther there are other ways to solve the questions as well. eg difficult remainder questions and questions on HCF like if HCF of 2 numbers is 13 and their sum is 2080, how many such pairs are possible? do we see such questions on gmat? _________________

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
17 Mar 2010, 14:07

Expert's post

gurpreetsingh wrote:

Hi Bunnel,

I m confused about the extent of level for number properties.. do we have to remmeber eculer's, fermat's,wilson's theorem on prime number. Actually I found their application to be quite useful but m not sure whther there are other ways to solve the questions as well. eg difficult remainder questions and questions on HCF like if HCF of 2 numbers is 13 and their sum is 2080, how many such pairs are possible? do we see such questions on gmat?

I don't think that these theorems are needed for GMAT. _________________

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
17 Mar 2010, 14:29

So is there any way we can solve the above HCF question? Also does the number theory stated here is sufficient to cover the concepts asked? _________________

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
07 Apr 2010, 01:12

5

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

fruit wrote:

Thanks! It was very very helpful! Kudos! But I have a question:

How many powers of 900 are in 50!

Make the prime factorization of the number: 900=2^2*3^2*5^2, then find the powers of these prime numbers in the n!.

Find the power of 2: \frac{50}{2}+\frac{50}{4}+\frac{50}{8}+\frac{50}{16}+\frac{50}{32}=25+12+6+3+1=47

= 2^{47}

Find the power of 3: \frac{50}{3}+\frac{50}{9}+\frac{50}{27}=16+5+1=22

=3^{22}

Find the power of 5: \frac{50}{5}+\frac{50}{25}=10+2=12

=5^{12}

We need all the prime {2,3,5} to be represented twice in 900, 5 can provide us with only 6 pairs, thus there is 900 in the power of 6 in 50!.

Why do we take just 5 from {2,3,5} and why do we need divide 12 by 2 to get the result?

Thanks in advance!

50!=900^xa=(2^2*3^2*5^2)^x*a, where x is the highest possible value of 900 and a is the product of other multiples of 50!.

50!=2^{47}*3^{22}*5^{12}*b=(2^2*3^2*5^2)^6*(2^{35}*3^{10})*b=900^{6}*(2^{35}*3^{10})*b, where b is the product of other multiples of 50!. So x=6.

Below is another example:

Suppose we have the number 18! and we are asked to to determine the power of 12 in this number. Which means to determine the highest value of x in 18!=12^x*a, where a is the product of other multiples of 18!.

12=2^2*3, so we should calculate how many 2-s and 3-s are in 18!.

Calculating 2-s: \frac{18}{2}+\frac{18}{2^2}+\frac{18}{2^3}+\frac{18}{2^4}=9+4+2+1=16. So the power of 2 (the highest power) in prime factorization of 18! is 16.

Calculating 3-s: \frac{18}{3}+\frac{18}{3^2}=6+2=8. So the power of 3 (the highest power) in prime factorization of 18! is 8.

Now as 12=2^2*3 we need twice as many 2-s as 3-s. 18!=2^{16}*3^8*a=(2^2)^8*3^8*a=(2^2*3)^8*a=12^8*a. So 18!=12^8*a --> x=8. _________________

Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
30 Apr 2010, 13:19

2

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel wrote:

NUMBER THEORY • For GMAT it's good to memorize following values: \sqrt{2}\approx{1.41} \sqrt{3}\approx{1.73} \sqrt{5}\approx{2.24} \sqrt{7}\approx{2.45} \sqrt{8}\approx{2.65} \sqrt{10}\approx{2.83}

Anyone else notice that these are wrong? They should be: • For GMAT it's good to memorize following values: \sqrt{2}\approx{1.41} \sqrt{3}\approx{1.73} \sqrt{5}\approx{2.24} \sqrt{6}\approx{2.45} \sqrt{7}\approx{2.65} \sqrt{8}\approx{2.83} \sqrt{10}\approx{3.16}

gmatclubot

Re: Math: Number Theory
[#permalink]
30 Apr 2010, 13:19

Great to know you are joining Kellogg. A lot was being talked about your last minute interview on Pagalguy (all good though). It was kinda surprise that you got the...