Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
30 Apr 2010, 13:30
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
AloneAndInsufficient wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
NUMBER THEORY • For GMAT it's good to memorize following values: \(\sqrt{2}\approx{1.41}\) \(\sqrt{3}\approx{1.73}\) \(\sqrt{5}\approx{2.24}\) \(\sqrt{7}\approx{2.45}\) \(\sqrt{8}\approx{2.65}\) \(\sqrt{10}\approx{2.83}\)
Anyone else notice that these are wrong? They should be: • For GMAT it's good to memorize following values: \(\sqrt{2}\approx{1.41}\) \(\sqrt{3}\approx{1.73}\) \(\sqrt{5}\approx{2.24}\) \(\sqrt{6}\approx{2.45}\) \(\sqrt{7}\approx{2.65}\) \(\sqrt{8}\approx{2.83}\) \(\sqrt{10}\approx{3.16}\)
Thanks. Edited. +1 for spotting this. _________________
Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
10 May 2010, 01:41
2
This post received KUDOS
Example: A company received $2 million in royalties on the first $10 million in sales and then $8 million in royalties on the next $100 million in sales. By what percent did the ratio of royalties to sales decrease from the first $10 million in sales to the next $100 million in sales?
Solution: Percent decrease can be calculated by the formula above: \(Percent=\frac{Change}{Original}*100=\frac{\frac{2}{10}-\frac{10}{100}}{\frac{2}{10}}*100=50%\), so the royalties decreased by 50%.
I could not get this , i think there is some error... Plzz explain..
as the same Q in Percent Part of Math book is giving an answer of 60 %..
Last edited by sag on 10 Jun 2010, 20:15, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
10 May 2010, 15:51
Expert's post
sag wrote:
Example: A company received $2 million in royalties on the first $10 million in sales and then $8 million in royalties on the next $100 million in sales. By what percent did the ratio of royalties to sales decrease from the first $10 million in sales to the next $100 million in sales?
Solution: Percent decrease can be calculated by the formula above: Percent=\frac{Change}{Original}*100=\frac{\frac{2}{10}-\frac{10}{100}}{\frac{2}{10}}*100=50%, so the royalties decreased by 50%.
I could not get this , i think there is some error... Plzz explain..
as the same Q in Percent Part of Math book is giving an answer of 60 %..
There was a typo. I edited it in Percent section and forgot to edit it here. Now it's OK. Thanks. +1 for spotting this. _________________
Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
12 May 2010, 12:53
sag wrote:
Example: A company received $2 million in royalties on the first $10 million in sales and then $8 million in royalties on the next $100 million in sales. By what percent did the ratio of royalties to sales decrease from the first $10 million in sales to the next $100 million in sales?
Solution: Percent decrease can be calculated by the formula above: Percent=\frac{Change}{Original}*100=\frac{\frac{2}{10}-\frac{10}{100}}{\frac{2}{10}}*100=50%, so the royalties decreased by 50%.
I could not get this , i think there is some error... Plzz explain..
as the same Q in Percent Part of Math book is giving an answer of 60 %..
2 million royalties on 10 million in sales is equivalent to 20 million royalties on 100 million sales (multiply both number by 10). Going down from 20 million royalties to 8 million royalties is a decrease of 60%.
Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
10 Jun 2010, 14:00
Expert's post
bely202 wrote:
If a is a factor of bc, and gcd(a,b)=1, then a is a factor of c.
Can anyone please explain this rule??? I'm not sure what it means by gcd(a,b)=1.
Thanks a bunch and great summary !!!!!
\(gcd(a,b)=1\) means that greatest common divisor of \(a\) and \(b\) is 1, or in other words they are co-prime, the don't share any common factor but 1. So if we are told that \(a\) is a factor of \(bc\) and \(a\) and \(b\) don't share any common factors, then it must be true that \(a\) is a factor of only \(c\).
So if \(a=3\), \(b=5\) (\(a\) and \(b\) don't share any common factors but 1, \(gcd(a,b)=1\)), \(c=6\) \(bc=30\) --> \(a=3\) is a factor of \(c=6\). _________________
Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
21 Jul 2010, 17:38
Thank you so much for compiling this! I have a few questions on the reasoning behind the rules... Sorry for the very long post.
Why is:
Perfect Square • The sum of distinct factors of a perfect square is ALWAYS ODD. • A perfect square ALWAYS has an ODD number of Odd-factors, and EVEN number of Even-factors. • Perfect square always has even number of powers of prime factors.
Consecutive Integers • The product of n consecutive integers is always divisible by n!. Given n=4 consecutive integers: \{3,4,5,6\}. The product of 3*4*5*6 is 360, which is divisible by 4!=24.
Evenly Spaced • If the first term is a_1 and the common difference of successive members is d, then the n_{th} term of the sequence is given by: a_ n=a_1+d(n-1)
Terminating Decimal Why must the denominator be 2^n5^m?
Exponents Why are: a^n-b^n is ALWAYS divisible by a-b. a^n + b^n is divisible by a+b if n is odd, and not divisible by a+b if n is even.
Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
11 Aug 2010, 16:12
2
This post received KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
fruit wrote:
Thanks! It was very very helpful! Kudos! But I have a question:
How many powers of 900 are in 50!
Make the prime factorization of the number: \(900=2^2*3^2*5^2\), then find the powers of these prime numbers in the n!.
Find the power of 2: \(\frac{50}{2}+\frac{50}{4}+\frac{50}{8}+\frac{50}{16}+\frac{50}{32}=25+12+6+3+1=47\)
= \(2^{47}\)
Find the power of 3: \(\frac{50}{3}+\frac{50}{9}+\frac{50}{27}=16+5+1=22\)
=\(3^{22}\)
Find the power of 5: \(\frac{50}{5}+\frac{50}{25}=10+2=12\)
=\(5^{12}\)
We need all the prime {2,3,5} to be represented twice in 900, 5 can provide us with only 6 pairs, thus there is 900 in the power of 6 in 50!.
Why do we take just 5 from {2,3,5} and why do we need divide 12 by 2 to get the result?
Thanks in advance!
\(50!=900^xa=(2^2*3^2*5^2)^x*a\), where \(x\) is the highest possible value of 900 and \(a\) is the product of other multiples of \(50!\).
\(50!=2^{47}*3^{22}*5^{12}*b=(2^2*3^2*5^2)^6*(2^{35}*3^{10})*b=900^{6}*(2^{35}*3^{10})*b\), where \(b\) is the product of other multiples of \(50!\). So \(x=6\).
Below is another example:
Suppose we have the number \(18!\) and we are asked to to determine the power of \(12\) in this number. Which means to determine the highest value of \(x\) in \(18!=12^x*a\), where \(a\) is the product of other multiples of \(18!\).
\(12=2^2*3\), so we should calculate how many 2-s and 3-s are in \(18!\).
Calculating 2-s: \(\frac{18}{2}+\frac{18}{2^2}+\frac{18}{2^3}+\frac{18}{2^4}=9+4+2+1=16\). So the power of \(2\) (the highest power) in prime factorization of \(18!\) is \(16\).
Calculating 3-s: \(\frac{18}{3}+\frac{18}{3^2}=6+2=8\). So the power of \(3\) (the highest power) in prime factorization of \(18!\) is \(8\).
Now as \(12=2^2*3\) we need twice as many 2-s as 3-s. \(18!=2^{16}*3^8*a=(2^2)^8*3^8*a=(2^2*3)^8*a=12^8*a\). So \(18!=12^8*a\) --> \(x=8\).
Does this relationship breakdown at some point? I thought this was great and was just experimenting and looked at 21! (calculated in excel) and it ends with 5 zeros. Using the methodology you described above it should have 4 zeros. Am I missing something or did I make a mistake somewhere?
Re: Math: Number Theory [#permalink]
11 Aug 2010, 17:07
2
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
utfan2424 wrote:
Does this relationship breakdown at some point? I thought this was great and was just experimenting and looked at 21! (calculated in excel) and it ends with 5 zeros. Using the methodology you described above it should have 4 zeros. Am I missing something or did I make a mistake somewhere?
You made everything right 21! ends with 21/5=4 zeros. It's excel: it makes rounding with such a huge numbers thus giving incorrect result. _________________
The “3 golden nuggets” of MBA admission process With ten years of experience helping prospective students with MBA admissions and career progression, I will be writing this blog through...
You know what’s worse than getting a ding at one of your dreams schools . Yes its getting that horrid wait-listed email . This limbo is frustrating as hell . Somewhere...