Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 18:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 193
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 78

Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2012, 14:31
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:28) correct 41% (01:50) wrong based on 164 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost 26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to 30 million to build. If it had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding, Roseville would have saved at least 4 million by now.

Councillor B: Your own financial reports inform us that 26 million in 1982 is equivalent to 37 million in 1992. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an under-used courthose for a decade, we can only view the delay as a financial boom for Roseville.

A point at issue between Mayor A and Councillor B is whether

A. Roseville will build a courthourse in 1992
B. 37 million in 1992 dollars is equivalent to 26 million in 1992
C. Mayor A is responsible for the city's financial reports
D. Roseville actually needed a new courthouse between 1982 and 1992
E. Roseville would have expended 4 million dollars to maintain a courthouse from 1982 to 1992

Veritas has borrowed this from another Test prep company. Why is D correct? If I say that not having a car in college years was a financial boon for me, does it mean that I didn't need the car? May be I needed the car but somehow, later on by chance, not having a car turned out to be a good thing.

Secondly, Councillor B doesn't say that the court house is not needed.
Not sure.

Experts - any thoughts?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 454
Location: United States (MA)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 166 [1] , given: 46

Re: Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2012, 14:48
1
KUDOS
A. Roseville will build a courthourse in 1992 >> Wrong

B. 37 million in 1992 dollars is equivalent to 26 million in 1992 >> Both agree to this. Wrong

C. Mayor A is responsible for the city's financial reports >> Never said anything about who is responsible. Wrong

D. Roseville actually needed a new courthouse between 1982 and 1992 >> Correct.

Mayor A: supports his argument with 'how the building would relieve the overcrowding'
Mayor B: supports his argument with 'by not having to maintain an under-used courthose for a decade'

Looks like both are arguing about whether the courthouse was actually needed.

E. Roseville would have expended 4 million dollars to maintain a courthouse from 1982 to 1992 >> The town would have spent some money to maintain the building. But how much? We dont know. Wrong.
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 193
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 78

Re: Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2012, 14:57
I think that there is a bit of a difference in saying "D. Mayor B: supports his argument with 'by not having to maintain an under-used courthose for a decade'" and "not needing a courthouse". In fact Mayor B's statemetn is that "Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an under-used courthose for a decade" - we cannot get rid of the main clause. The guy is talking about money not spent on financial maintenance.

If I say that I didn't have to maintain my car. Does it mean that I didn't need it? I don't think so. I am just talking about the maintenance of a car.
Manager
Status: faciendo quod indiget fieri
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 88
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 4

Re: Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2012, 15:16
voodoochild wrote:
Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost 26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to 30 million to build. If it had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding, Roseville would have saved at least 4 million by now.

Councillor B: Your own financial reports inform us that 26 million in 1982 is equivalent to 37 million in 1992. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an under-used courthose for a decade, we can only view the delay as a financial boom for Roseville.

A point at issue between Mayor A and Councillor B is whether

A. Roseville will build a courthourse in 1992
B. 37 million in 1992 dollars is equivalent to 26 million in 1992
C. Mayor A is responsible for the city's financial reports
D. Roseville actually needed a new courthouse between 1982 and 1992
E. Roseville would have expended 4 million dollars to maintain a courthouse from 1982 to 1992

Veritas has borrowed this from another Test prep company. Why is D correct? If I say that not having a car in college years was a financial boon for me, does it mean that I didn't need the car? May be I needed the car but somehow, later on by chance, not having a car turned out to be a good thing.

Secondly, Councillor B doesn't say that the court house is not needed.
Not sure.

Experts - any thoughts?

I agree with the OA here and correct answer should be D because the issue here is not time of value of money but whether we needed the courthouse for a decade or not!

Time value of money is not being debated in the argument, thus we can eliminate rest of the answers.

Quote:
I think that there is a bit of a difference in saying "D. Mayor B: supports his argument with 'by not having to maintain an under-used courthose for a decade'" and "not needing a courthouse". In fact Mayor B's statemetn is that "Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an under-used courthose for a decade" - we cannot get rid of the main clause. The guy is talking about money not spent on financial maintenance.

If I say that I didn't have to maintain my car. Does it mean that I didn't need it? I don't think so. I am just talking about the maintenance of a car.

Here the discussion is NOT money BUT utilization.

If lets say you bought a BMW(i love beamers) in college in 1982 for 100 dollars(i wish ) and didnt actually use but kept on paying maintenance for 4 years. it totally cost you 160 at the end of 4 years.

Now if you didnt buy a car at that time but bought one, when you actually needed i.e after college for 120 .. which is a better deal?

I dont think you will argue that i should have bought it in 1982 and i would have saved 20 bucks, instead you would argue that did i need a car at that time plus what about the maintenance cost i will end up paying.

Hope this helps
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10526
Followers: 917

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2014, 10:38
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Current Student
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 939
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 134

Kudos [?]: 838 [0], given: 546

Re: Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2014, 23:50
voodoochild wrote:
Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs would have cost 26 million. Now in 1992 the same building is costing the city close to 30 million to build. If it had been built in 1982 when I first showed how the building would relieve the overcrowding, Roseville would have saved at least 4 million by now.

Councillor B: Your own financial reports inform us that 26 million in 1982 is equivalent to 37 million in 1992. Adding that difference to the money Roseville has saved by not having to maintain an under-used court house for a decade, we can only view the delay as a financial boom for Roseville.

A point at issue between Mayor A and Councillor B is whether

A. Roseville will build a courthourse in 1992
B. 37 million in 1992 dollars is equivalent to 26 million in 1992
C. Mayor A is responsible for the city's financial reports
D. Roseville actually needed a new courthouse between 1982 and 1992
E. Roseville would have expended 4 million dollars to maintain a courthouse from 1982 to 1992

Veritas has borrowed this from another Test prep company. Why is D correct? If I say that not having a car in college years was a financial boon for me, does it mean that I didn't need the car? May be I needed the car but somehow, later on by chance, not having a car turned out to be a good thing.

Secondly, Councillor B doesn't say that the court house is not needed.
Not sure.

Experts - any thoughts?

Some of the key points to consider:
Councillor B: Your own financial reports inform us that 26 million in 1982 is equivalent to 37 million in 1992. Adding that difference to the money Rosevillehas saved by not having to maintain an under-used court house for a decade , we can only view the delay as a financial boom for Roseville.

Apart from the Financial saving for not building, they also saved money for not maintaining the building.

Letting the options A to C rest in peace, only options that are in contention is D and E.

Now E) Roseville would have expended 4 million dollars to maintain a courthouse from 1982 to 1992
As per the "Mayor A", 4 million \$ is saved if they had built in 1982 and not for maintaining it and "Councillor B" says that figure is wrong.

And Option D) Roseville actually needed a new courthouse between 1982 and 1992 is left out and that is evident by statement made by "Councillor B" as "an under-used court house". hence Option D)
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Prodigy for Tepper - CMU : http://bit.ly/cmuloan-kd

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10526
Followers: 917

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2016, 12:05
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Mayor A: In 1982 the courthouse that Roseville still needs   [#permalink] 27 Jul 2016, 12:05
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
14 Mayor of Plainsville 6 16 Jul 2015, 19:42
9 Mayor of Alberville: Factories in Alberville ... 4 03 Oct 2013, 06:13
Mayor Delmonte 10 25 May 2010, 01:58
Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and 1995 the 10 24 Jul 2008, 11:00
Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and 1995 the 5 25 Feb 2008, 15:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by