Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Aug 2014, 09:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Meteorologists say that if only they could design an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Meteorologists say that if only they could design an [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2003, 08:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (00:00) correct 33% (01:36) wrong based on 4 sessions
Meteorologists say that if only they could design an accurate mathematical model of the atmosphere with all its complexities, they could forecast the weather with real precision. But this is an idle boast, immune to any evaluation, for any inadequate weather forecast would obviously be blamed on imperfections in the model.

Which of the following, if true, could best be used as a basis for arguing against the author's position that the meteorologists' claim cannot be evaluated?

(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.
(B) Most significant gains in the accuracy of the relevant mathematical models are accompanied by clear gains in the precision of weather forecasts.
(C) Mathematical models of the meteorological aftermath of such catastrophic events as volcanic eruptions are beginning to be constructed.
(D) Modern weather forecasts for as much as a full day ahead are broadly correct about 80 percent of the time.
(E) Meteorologists readily concede that the accurate mathematical model they are talking about is not now in their power to construct.

The answer is B. However, I choose A because I think if certain data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts, then inadequate weather forcasts will be blamed on those data rather than flaws in the math model, thus weakening the author's argument. Am I wrong? Can someone explain anwser B? Thanks~
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 665 [0], given: 781

Re: CR question [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2003, 14:47
Joviest wrote:
Meteorologists say that if only they could design an accurate mathematical model of the atmosphere with all its complexities, they could forecast the weather with real precision. But this is an idle boast, immune to any evaluation, for any inadequate weather forecast would obviously be blamed on imperfections in the model.

Which of the following, if true, could best be used as a basis for arguing against the author's position that the meteorologists' claim cannot be evaluated?

(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.
(B) Most significant gains in the accuracy of the relevant mathematical models are accompanied by clear gains in the precision of weather forecasts.
(C) Mathematical models of the meteorological aftermath of such catastrophic events as volcanic eruptions are beginning to be constructed.
(D) Modern weather forecasts for as much as a full day ahead are broadly correct about 80 percent of the time.
(E) Meteorologists readily concede that the accurate mathematical model they are talking about is not now in their power to construct.

The answer is B. However, I choose A because I think if certain data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts, then inadequate weather forcasts will be blamed on those data rather than flaws in the math model, thus weakening the author's argument. Am I wrong? Can someone explain anwser B? Thanks~



Hi,

The author concludes that the metorologists claim cannot be evaluated.
We have to show that he may not be right.

A suggests that certain peices of data form the results of the model...
even if you say the data is the reason, it still does not provide anything to disprove the authors conclusion. The author claims that the model cannot be proved to be accurate.

B suggests that to improve forecasts, we need to build good and accurate mathematical models which will result in precise forecasts.

Clear Gains in the Accuracy of Mathematical Models = Gains in the precision of the weather forecasts

If this is true, then the authors argument about the evaluation of the
model is weakened...

hope this helps

thanks
praetorian
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2003
Posts: 73
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR question [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2003, 09:53
(A) Certain unusual configurations of data can serve as the basis for precise weather forecasts even though the exact causal mechanisms are not understood.
(B) Most significant gains in the accuracy of the relevant mathematical models are accompanied by clear gains in the precision of weather forecasts.
Really hard to choose between A and B.
My approach is pratical. B sounds to show a link between model and precision.... to take B.
In the test, I don't know if I can have enough time to form official arguement
:o
_________________

I have 2 month for gmat.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 259
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 106

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Meteorologists say that if only they could design an [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2012, 09:48
I'm not quite sure, but I think it is B.
_________________

Kudos if you like the post!

Failing to plan is planning to fail.

Re: Meteorologists say that if only they could design an   [#permalink] 13 Jul 2012, 09:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Designed to accommodate only 20 million tons of trash ZeeUsuf 4 14 Mar 2014, 02:40
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic Meteorologists say that if only they could design elegan 2 29 Oct 2012, 22:55
Meteorologists noboru 8 02 Sep 2009, 13:58
If only I could get this on the real thing ... pmenon 5 26 May 2008, 14:02
2 If only we could get away with this on the GMAT... jsnooky33 21 21 Feb 2007, 16:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Meteorologists say that if only they could design an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.