TGC wrote:
Right: Antonio DROVE to the store, and Cristina BOUGHT some ice cream.
In the sentence above, which has
two main clauses linked by and, we are not emphasizing
the order of events (although drove probably happened before bought). Clauses linked by
and or but do not require the Past Perfect as a
general rule.Using this construction, you can even make a tricky sentence in which the first clause
expresses an early action in Simple Past. Then, a second clause expresses a later action in
Past Perfect to indicate continued effect (by a still later past time).
Right: The band U2
WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene
in the early 1980's,
but less than ten years later, U2
HAD fully ECLIPSEDits early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
To
MGMAT staff,
Don't you think giving above two examples in SC guide is a paradox.
In the first example the guide says that clauses linked by AND/BUT DO NOT REQUIRE PAST PERFECT as a GENERAL RULE. However, in the second example some ambiguous concept is explained , contradicting the First Example.
Plz enlighten as to what the second example signifies and is trying to explain
Rgds,
TGC!
Let me start by emphasizing the principle that you need to remember about Past Perfect - The Past Perfect is used on the GMAT to show a time relationship between two events in the past with the earlier event having the past perfect tense. If you remember that, you will be good on the vast majority of SC problems involving the past perfect verb tense.
The U2 example is very complex and runs counter to the principle above. More importantly, you really wouldn't see a problem that utilizes this rule very often, if at all. Here is the sentence again:
Right: The band U2
WAS just one of many new groups on the rock music scene
in the early 1980's,
but less than ten years later, U2
HAD fully ECLIPSEDits early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
In this particular construction, the Past Perfect is not used to show the earlier of two past events. The earlier event is actually that U2 was on the rock scene in the early 80s. The past perfect clause is a later event and it shows that U2 had eclipsed other rivals
and the 'eclipsing' was still in effect. In essence, in this particular sentence, the past perfect is acting like the present perfect (present perfect is used to show that an action started in the past and the action or its effect is still ongoing).
Again, remember the earlier principle and don't get too caught up in largely irrelevant examples like this one.
KW